Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

2 important Iraq issues virtually not covered

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
SHRED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-21-07 08:44 AM
Original message
2 important Iraq issues virtually not covered
The fight over the oil:
Bush wants it privatized for his oil buddies and Iraq wants what is theirs.
http://www.fpif.org/fpiftxt/4399

Saudis are killing our troops:
http://www.alternet.org/story/57391

---

Both are not covered, or barely covered, by USA mainstream television.

Why is this?
Does the military/industrial/complex own that much of our media?

---
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sellitman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-21-07 09:10 AM
Response to Original message
1. Thats a rhetorical question
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SHRED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-21-07 09:21 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. I know
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-21-07 09:14 AM
Response to Original message
2. that is where the bottle neck is
if we the people knew about these two issues what to do would be obvious to all including our elected officials, its not so it ain't
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fwiff Donating Member (184 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-21-07 09:33 AM
Response to Original message
4. I’ve been asking the same questions
My thinking is speculation and still-in-progress

The oil law is non-controversial in the US and both parties seem united in this.

My understanding of the PNAC agenda is more about control and power of the oil supply both in the ME and in rapidly developing nations as a leverage tool. The profit motive is strong, but not primary.

I think it’s because if the US doesn’t get and maintain this oil law, ALL the influence on Iraq oil supply (and the world) will vanish, poof. Foreign policy people do NOT want this to happen. Bushco has f’d up influence channels throughout the world. US influence will be severely diminished.


2. The media is lazy, and they want neat, easily presentable controversy. Though there’s (relatively) only a small number of foreign fighters (in comparison to the ‘patriots fighting the invaders’), the only information they’re given and therefore, spout, is that they’re all from the ‘enemy’, Iran.
It’s too messy to present Bush buddy Bandar (uber-ally) as undermining the war.

That’s my take, anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-21-07 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
5. the elephant in the room
what is more disturbing to me are the Democrats pushing this "benchmark" for Big Oil as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SHRED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-21-07 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. the more this oil robbery drags out....
...and the more the Democratic Representatives do not talk about it...the more I realize just how corrupted our government has become under these people's guidance...of both Parties.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-21-07 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. I cam to realize it
after the 2004 election. Then when Nancy put Impeachment off the table I knew it had become far worse than I ever dreaded it would be.

:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SHRED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-21-07 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. how is it within her power...
...to take a Constitutional right "off the table"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-21-07 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. it is not
but a lot of folks here defend that horrible decision. :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SHRED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-21-07 07:49 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. that is sickening
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blackhatjack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-21-07 08:38 PM
Response to Original message
11. Both are key issues you have correctly identified as 'not to be reported" by MSM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 07:43 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC