Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Remember: Rumsfeld threatened to fire anyone mentioning the need for "Phase 4" planning

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
journalist3072 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-21-07 11:29 AM
Original message
Remember: Rumsfeld threatened to fire anyone mentioning the need for "Phase 4" planning
Edited on Sat Jul-21-07 11:34 AM by journalist3072
In light of the Pentagon's purely political response to Sen. Clinton's inquiry on the Pentagon's plans to withdraw troops from Iraq, I think there are a few things worth keeping in mind here:

1. Brigadier General Mark Scheid said Rumsfeld threatened to fire anyone who mentioned the need for "Phase 4" (post-invasion) planning. From the Washington Monthly:

"HE WOULD FIRE THE NEXT PERSON THAT SAID THAT"....Today, via Orin Kerr, comes a remarkable interview with Brigadier General Mark Scheid, chief of the Logistics War Plans Division after 9/11, and one of the people with primary responsibility for war planning. Shortly after the invasion of Afghanistan, he says, Donald Rumsfeld told his team to start planning for war in Iraq, but not to bother planning for a long stay:

"The secretary of defense continued to push on us ... that everything we write in our plan has to be the idea that we are going to go in, we're going to take out the regime, and then we're going to leave," Scheid said. "We won't stay."

Scheid said the planners continued to try "to write what was called Phase 4," or the piece of the plan that included post-invasion operations like occupation.

Even if the troops didn't stay, "at least we have to plan for it," Scheid said.

"I remember the secretary of defense saying that he would fire the next person that said that," Scheid said. "We would not do planning for Phase 4 operations, which would require all those additional troops that people talk about today.

"He said we will not do that because the American public will not back us if they think we are going over there for a long war."


Source: http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2006_09/009469.php


2. There was an article in the Knight-Ridder newspaper which concluded that post-war planning was non-existent. From the Knight-Ridder article:

Planning for After the War in Iraq Non-Existent
by Warren P. Strobel and John Walcott

WASHINGTON - In March 2003, days before the start of the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq, American war planners and intelligence officials met at Shaw Air Force Base in South Carolina to review the Bush administration's plans to oust Saddam Hussein and implant democracy in Iraq.

Near the end of his presentation, an Army lieutenant colonel who was giving a briefing showed a slide describing the Pentagon's plans for rebuilding Iraq after the war, known in the planners' parlance as Phase 4-C. He was uncomfortable with his material - and for good reason.

The slide said: "To Be Provided."



Source: http://www.commondreams.org/headlines04/1016-06.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sakabatou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-21-07 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
1. Incompetant to the highest level
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
journalist3072 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-21-07 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. And criminal, IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC