Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

'terror expert' at Cato puts together what I and others have blogged for years

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-21-07 12:11 PM
Original message
'terror expert' at Cato puts together what I and others have blogged for years
Edited on Sat Jul-21-07 12:18 PM by yurbud
Here's the expert's story:

http://www.upi.com/Security_Terrorism/Briefing/2007/07/20/expert_alqaida_cant_conquer_iraq/3090/


Here's what I posted on my blog a couple of days ago:

THE INSURGENCY IS NOT AL QAEDA


http://www.boston.com/news/world/middleeast/articles/2005/07/17/study_cites_seeds_of_terror_in_iraq/">Israelis and Saudis separately studied our interrogations of foreign fighters captured in Iraq and found that most had no prior connection to al Qaeda and were motivated by our invasion, not religious fundamentalism.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/04/09/AR2006040900890_pf.html">The military admits they inflated al Qaeda and Zarqawi's role in the insurgency for propaganda purposes in both Iraq and the US.

http://www.worldpublicopinion.org/pipa/articles/brmiddleeastnafricara/248.php?nid=&id=&pnt=248&lb=brme">The Iraqis don't like al Qaeda. The Bushies use this to make the leap to say that they don't like all the insurgency. The reality is Iraqis recognize al Qaeda is responsible for attacks on civilians and are trying to inflame sectarian violence, and sectarian violence is one of our excuses for staying.

http://professorsmartass.blogspot.com/2007/07/facts-missing-from-iraq-debate-updated.html


I made the same observation this guy did back during the 'killing Zarqawi' stunt:
http://professorsmartass.blogspot.com/2006/06/3-things-about-killing-zarqawi.html

If this 'expert' is joining the reality based community, god bless him. But the media should come up with a new term for someone with a lot of degrees who says something laymen who follow the news figured out a couple of years ago, and that conscientious experts and reporters said before the war even started. Maybe they should call them experts on the DC consensus or corporate 'house experts' like they used to call the slaves who waited on the master instead of picking cotton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-21-07 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yep--the Iraqis don't want AQ either. If you're a recently destabilized
country made up of tribal factions, all of whom are seeking power and advantage, why would you want violent foreign fighters to gain the upper hand? They have no stake in that country, it is not their homeland. Even 94% of Sunnis, according the the UPI article, don't have a favorable view of AQ, and AQ is largely Sunni-affiliated, from what I understand. I will have to check out UPI more often--they seem to have some excellent and insightful articles in there. Noticed that there was one about my Senator (Hagel) in the sidebar about a Cato speech he made--another good read. Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrPrax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-21-07 12:47 PM
Response to Original message
2. Kicked
Recommend -- great links.

From his Greg Palast link:

"...O.I.L. How droll of them, how cute. Then, Karl Rove made the giggling boys in the White House change it to “OIF” — Operation Iraqi Freedom. But the 101st Airborne wasn’t sent to Basra to get its hands on Iraq’s OIF.

“It’s about oil,” Robert Ebel told me. Who is Ebel? Formerly the CIA’s top oil analyst, he was sent by the Pentagon, about a month before the invasion, to a secret confab in London with Saddam’s former oil minister to finalize the plans for “liberating” Iraq’s oil industry. In London, Bush’s emissary Ebel also instructed Ibrahim Bahr al-Ulum, the man the Pentagon would choose as post-OIF oil minister for Iraq, on the correct method of disposing Iraq’s crude.

And what did the USA want Iraq to do with Iraq’s oil? The answer will surprise many of you: and it is uglier, more twisted, devilish and devious than anything imagined by the most conspiracy-addicted blogger. The answer can be found in a 323-page plan for Iraq’s oil secretly drafted by the State Department. Our team got a hold of a copy; how, doesn’t matter. The key thing is what’s inside this thick Bush diktat: a directive to Iraqis to maintain a state oil company that will “enhance its relationship with OPEC.”

Enhance its relationship with OPEC??? How strange: the government of the United States ordering Iraq to support the very OPEC oil cartel which is strangling our nation with outrageously high prices for crude..."

Greg Palast

Link found via: Professor SmartAss

Don't like CATO, but even these days ideologically bent folks like that have no problem seeing the light, which makes it all the more peculiar that 'moderates' never seem to see through it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soothsayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-21-07 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
3. I'm pretty sure al qaeda was--and is--- a CIA invention. now maybe they actually
RECRUIT woulld-be terrorists to get them in sting operations, or maybe they created it and it sort of took on a rudimentary life of its own, but I mostly don't believe it's real.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-21-07 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Certainly not the monster threat they present to us.
And they sure as hell got most of their training from us.

But I continue to believe it's racist to insist that the brown guys can't plot and plan well enough to cause us misery and grief. It's racist to deny their capacity for independent thought and action.

But were the zealots duped into being tools of this administration's usurpation of power? I suspect they were. The Bush administration had all the necessary information to stop them. Didn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-21-07 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. I have to disagree--I think it's a real threat.
A monster that we helped create with our own past policies and actions in Afghanistan and the ME, and overused as propaganda to keep our war efforts going, but real nonetheless. I hate to go down the road of giving people the impression that Democrats don't take the AQ/terror threat seriously. Believe me, if Pakistan ends up destabilized, and AQ or an equally militant Islamic terror faction manages to take control of its nukes, we're going to believe they exist. Scary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-21-07 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. if you read some history on false flag terror and even our terrorist problems, it's easy to divert
channel, or catch these groups.

Even the ITALIANS, when the Red Brigade was about to kidnap someone that wasn't politically useful to them swooped in, arrested the leadership, then used their provocateurs in the group to redirect their efforts toward kidnapping and killing the prime minister, which they did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-21-07 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. I don't know if our inability to contain AQ is out of incompetence
or if it was deliberate--the paranoid part of me thinks it was deliberate to leave the "head on the snake", because taking out Osama too soon would not have been useful to Chimpy's Middle East efforts. Now that the American public has grown impatient, suddenly there's a renewed interest in AQ and in getting Bin Laden. But it's also entirely conceivable to me that the hatred of us by radical Muslims is real and dangerous, despite any manipulations by ChimpCo of the terror threat and of the "war on terror" itself. I simply disagree with the comment that AQ is wholly a CIA invention, and thus not a genuine threat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-21-07 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. before the first WTC bombing in '93, FBI had an informant in bombers group...
he started recording his handlers when they wanted him to give the bombers real explosives (he thought it might be better to give them fake stuff himself).


Likewise, two of the 9/11 bombers lives with an FBI informant.

Some were on a terror watch list, but got expedited visas from Saudi Arabia.

and Sen. Bob Graham said the joint congressional inquiry into 9/11 found that two of the hijackers were backed by the Saudi government.

We were on those guys like white on rice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-21-07 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. But are they still in any way under our control or manipulation, or are they
the Frankenstein that broke out of the lab? I'm not too surprised by the FBI/Saudi connections to the terrorists, I kind of suspected that--what I want to know is, just how much of AQ's activities and power are influenced directly by us, and how much of it is their genuine stated goal to wipe us out? Combo of both, perhaps?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-21-07 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #14
22. see this documentary on what we did in Europe with terror groups until 1991:


http://professorsmartass.blogspot.com/2007/07/bbc-video-on-false-flag-terror-intel.html

You should always ask yourself whose interests are served by the action in question.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-21-07 04:43 PM
Response to Reply #14
25. Who is this "They" you speak of?
Westerners INSIST on believing THEIR structures are the "norm." Arab culture does NOT follow your "top down" rules. You cannot grasp the dynamics until you confront this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-21-07 11:50 PM
Response to Reply #25
34. Al Qaeda. There were previous comments (above) linking AQ to the US Government.
Edited on Sat Jul-21-07 11:51 PM by wienerdoggie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-21-07 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #3
17. The CIA paid OBL millions to help him build the resistance to the Russian invasion of Afghanistan
While he was at it he kept getting requests by people who wanted to help.

He entered those names into a table on his PC.
That is how the database "AL Quaida" was born.

It was conceived bought and paid for by the CIA.
Why do you think we will never see OBL in a court of law?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiFascist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-21-07 05:53 PM
Response to Reply #17
26. Ah ha, this makes sense! ...
I always considered OBL to be a double-agent, not so much with the CIA but possibly with Saudi intelligence. His purpose may be to recruit the worst enemies of the ruling royalty, only to have them blow themselves up or captured if they get too close to the House of Saud. There are long lists of al Qaeda operatives captured in SA. The purpose of 9-11 may have been to get the US involved in attacking these enemies of the ruling elite all across the Middle East.

Bush Senior created the Shadow Government by splitting off parts of the CIA and privatizing them as a way of working around Congress in order to setup SA intelligence and its air force. Talk about "Islamo-fascism"...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kimmerspixelated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-21-07 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #3
19. Wasn't Bin Laden a CIA operative?
If truly so, most sheeple would be aghast, would they not,regarding the fact that basically OBL is/was on the payroll of the the BUSHITS!OBL...connect the dots...(US)=9/11 attack!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-21-07 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
6. Bingo - this is a phony republicon oil & power CRUSADE
And it is making America hordes of enemies around the world, and a hell of a lot unsafer.

But the chickenhawk republicons are reaping Massive War Profits, and could give a shit less about Iraq, or America, or our sons and daughters in uniform suffering and dying for republicon greed.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-21-07 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
7. Trailing-edge theorists?
Drag riders in the sky?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-21-07 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #7
21. Both good and descriptive possibilities. . . n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-21-07 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
8. How about "the prodigal experts?"
This seems to have a spiritual feel about it and many of the people duped by the deceptions, may be able to relate to it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-21-07 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
9. CORRECTION: this guy has been right on Iraq all along
I went to CATO page to check his track record, and by the time I looked it up, the editing period on this post had expired.

I didn't mean to piss on our side, I just picked the wrong scapegoat for the "late to reality" party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CGowen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-21-07 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
13. Just after 911 "Ansar al-Islam" pops up in Iraq-Kurdistan, some even suggest flown into the region
Edited on Sat Jul-21-07 01:50 PM by CGowen
...........

Since September 2001, Ansar al-Islam has grown in size, incorporating Al Qaeda fighters who fled Afghanistan in the wake of the US bombings. (Christian Science Monitor, 15 March 2002) Revealed by Seymour Hersh, "an unknown number" of Taliban and Al Qaeda fighters "were flown to safety" in a US sponsored airlift organised by Pakistan's Military and Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI). These Mujahideen fighters were apparently evacuated to Kashmir, where they joined Al Qaeda and ISI supported Islamic terrorist groups. While there is no firm evidence, one suspects that some of the Mujahideen fighters may also have fled from Afghanistan to other countries (eg. Northern Iraq), with the tacit approval of the Pentagon.

Northern Iraq -which falls in "the no fly zone"-- is virtually a US protectorate. US military and intelligence observers stationed in the Kurdish region have turned a blind eye to the influx of Al Qaeda fighters from Afghanistan, as well as to the various acts of terrorism committed in the Kurdish region. According to one report «Al Qaida affiliates coordinating the movement of people, money and supplies for Ansar al-Islam have been operating freely in the capital." (Midland Independent, 6 February 2003). In all likelihood, Ansar al-Islam, which is also integrated by Afghan-Arabs, is supported through the same covert US intelligence channels as other Al Qaeda related organisations in Central Asia and the Middle East.

.........

http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/CHO302B.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aint_no_life_nowhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-21-07 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
15. Yet if you listened to the Republicans at this past week's all-night session
in the Senate, including people like McCain and Hatch, everything, I mean everything was Al Qaeda. I don't think I even heard the Republicans mention the insurgents in Iraq once. It was as though the Iraqis continued to want to shower our troops with flowers and candies, but Al Qaeda is preventing it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-21-07 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. The word "insurgent" fails to scare the American people. Kinda
reminds us of our OWN "insurgency" in 1776--natives who want the occupiers out. Not enough of a loaded, enemy-conjuring word.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-21-07 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #15
23. to them, everyone to the left of Ann Coulter is al Qaeda
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-21-07 03:38 PM
Response to Original message
18. I made the same observation the week we strolled into Baghdad
that the latest sport among young Iraqi men would soon be blowing up our soldiers. It was so damn obvious, only a compromised Bullshit Media System determined to fill the void with total blather could have missed it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-21-07 04:23 PM
Response to Original message
20. I like "house experts".. Kind of like pets.
They reside in the Beltway, attend cocktail parties (I mean what the hell are those these days?). Some belong to highly placed network executives and they are regularly lent to the administration for feeding and petting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-21-07 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
24. What about Yesperts?
:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-21-07 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #24
27. reminds me of Yes Men except the "Yesperts" aren't being funny on purpose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-21-07 10:32 PM
Response to Reply #27
30. Nothing they do is funny, agree. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-21-07 11:47 PM
Response to Reply #30
32. best example is Amy Goodman talking about MSM coverage of WTO protesters
They have a correspondent on the street saying there's a bunch of crazy kids and he can't figure out why they are protesting, but instead of asking one of them what they are upset about, the newscast goes back to the studio to talk to the usual 'experts' who also claim they don't know what the kids want--when they could have just as cheaply, if not more so, talked to the protesters themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-21-07 11:56 PM
Response to Reply #32
36. I think every morning they get maps detailing where the can o worms
are that they have to avoid or lose their jobs.

And then, there's the al Jazeera reporter, Sami al Hajj being held at Gitmo for no reason at all.

It's not a war on terror, it's an info war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-22-07 02:16 AM
Response to Reply #36
37. there's a reason he's there, the same reason they bombed al Jazeera in Iraq, Afghanistan, & Bush
wanted to bomb them in Qatar--intimidation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-22-07 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #37
38. CPAN aired this amazingly self-congratulatory AP segment
last night. The panel did have some actual old time journalists on it -- with great stories from Viet Nam, the Civil Rights movement, the first steroids bust and so on.

But the punchline for the segment was, The AP is still doing excellent work!

I feel so much better now!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
althecat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-21-07 09:38 PM
Response to Reply #24
29. Thats a great term.. and I shall definitely use it...
.. the IEA for example has been full of yesperts for decades.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-21-07 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. It's yours. Go forth and kick yespert @ss, Al. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
althecat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-21-07 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
28. Recovered Reality Syndrome
We should really have a forum for people suffering from that too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-21-07 11:48 PM
Response to Reply #28
33. 'My name is Tom Friedman, and I've just returned to reality...'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
althecat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-21-07 11:56 PM
Response to Reply #33
35. ... & pigs will fly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC