Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Need any further proof that "abstinance only" programs are a total waste of our tax dollars?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
PA Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-22-07 07:03 AM
Original message
Need any further proof that "abstinance only" programs are a total waste of our tax dollars?
The long decline in sexual activity among U.S. teenagers, hailed as one of the nation's most important social and public health successes, appears to have stalled.

After decreasing steadily and significantly for more than a decade, the percentage of teenagers having intercourse began to plateau in 2001 and has failed to budge since then, despite the intensified focus in recent years on encouraging sexual abstinence, according to new analyses of data from a large federal survey.

The halt in the downward trend coincided with an increase in federal spending on programs focused exclusively on encouraging sexual abstinence until marriage, several experts noted. Congress is currently debating funding for such efforts, which receive about $175 million a year in federal money and have come under fire from some quarters for being ineffective.

The leveling off in teen sexual activity is worrying experts and advocates across the ideological spectrum. The fall of such activity has been one of the key forces behind a historic drop in teen pregnancy rates and has bolstered efforts to protect teenagers from sexually transmitted diseases such as AIDS.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/07/21/AR2007072101275.html?hpid=topnews
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
RC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-22-07 07:40 AM
Response to Original message
1. Birth control availability had nothing to do with the drop of
teen pregnancies? And now with the programs being underfunded and destroyed, the lack of available birth control for teens is not a factor?

Abstinence only cannot work because the people pushing it do not understand what human beings really are. We are animals with instincts and pushing false information will do little to nothing to override millions of years of honed species survival conduct.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PA Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-22-07 08:36 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Hush now with all that crazy talk about "animal instincts".
Next thing you know, you'll be trying to tell us that man is descended from apes. And then we'll have to send you off to the Creation Museum for a re-indoctrination course. :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-22-07 09:00 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. We are not descended from the apes.
We come from the same root stock. It branched and they went one way and we another.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
clixtox Donating Member (941 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-22-07 08:02 AM
Response to Original message
2. Nope...
The evidence all indicates results are not even an issue. It is all about political posturing and appealing to all of the religious fanatics who supposedly vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PA Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-22-07 08:39 AM
Response to Original message
4. Another upsetting tidbit of info. The House approved a $28 million increase for abstinence only
programs. From the article:

The House last week approved a $28 million increase in spending on abstinence programs -- Democratic leaders said it was intended to win Republican support for the annual health and education funding bill -- but the Senate is considering a $28 million cut, largely because of concerns about the programs' efficacy.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/07/21/AR2007072101275.html?hpid=topnews
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMMNG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-22-07 08:52 AM
Response to Original message
5. Time for the taxpayer funded chastity belts
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 10:06 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC