Disturbed
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-22-07 04:32 PM
Original message |
Who would be a more effective Speaker of the House? |
rusty charly
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-22-07 04:33 PM
Response to Original message |
MonkeyFunk
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-22-07 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
4. While there's no actual requirement |
|
that the speaker of the House be a member of the House, the House has never chosen a non-member as their speaker, and very likely would not choose a Senator for that role.
|
jgraz
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-22-07 04:33 PM
Response to Original message |
|
I'd vote for Waxman or Conyers, but that might distract them from their investigations.
|
stirlingsliver
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-22-07 04:35 PM
Response to Original message |
|
I think John Conyers would be a better Speaker of the House.
He is trying to get impeachment proceedings started.
|
Disturbed
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-22-07 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
5. FYI Feinglold is a Senator. |
|
I think he should replace Reid, who is a wuss.
Speaker of the House- Rep. Conyers
|
stirlingsliver
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-22-07 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
|
p.s. -- I think you may have replied to the wrong post.
|
OzarkDem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-22-07 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
|
He has a good temperament, lots of experience and courage.
|
napi21
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-22-07 04:38 PM
Response to Original message |
6. Dick Durbin. He speaks very well in interviews, and seems to |
|
have the cooperation of all the other Dems at least!
|
MonkeyFunk
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-22-07 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
|
it's exceedingly unlikely the House would choose a Senator as their Speaker. Traditionally, it's always been a member of the House.
|
napi21
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-22-07 05:02 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
19. You're right of course. Sorry! I've been trying to think of someone who |
|
has impressed me in front of the cameras! That part is as important as what adjenda is set in the House. To be a good speaker and be able to deal well with the media is a BIG ADVANTAGE!
|
reichstag911
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-22-07 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
12. Durbin's a senator. nt |
davidwparker
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-22-07 04:39 PM
Response to Original message |
8. Kucinich. Anyone from the Black Caucus. |
MonkeyFunk
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-22-07 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
11. What would make them more effective? |
davidwparker
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-22-07 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
16. They act. They speak truth to power. They call it as they see it. I've |
|
not heard Kucinich back down or the Black Caucus either.
|
Telly Savalas
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-22-07 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #16 |
26. Given power's poor track record for listening, speaking truth to it is overrated |
|
as a tactic for influencing policy decisions.
The best trait a Speaker could have is the ability to get the Blue Dogs and DLC to get their shit together and support a progressive agenda -- that is actually getting quality bills and resolutions passed. It's unclear if Pelosi is the best person for this job, but it's unlikely Kucinich would be doing any better.
|
John Q. Citizen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-22-07 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
17. The ability to speak the truth. It would resonate with the American people. |
MonkeyFunk
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-22-07 05:02 PM
Response to Reply #17 |
|
Edited on Sun Jul-22-07 05:03 PM by MonkeyFunk
wouldn't Kucinich have done much better last he ran for President? Or be doing better this time?
|
JacquesMolay
(413 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-22-07 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
24. I love Dennis, but he'd be polarizing.. |
|
... like it or not, you have to have a centrist in that position who doesn't make a target of himself. Look at what happened to Newt Gingrich on the other side of the spectrum.
|
TahitiNut
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-22-07 04:40 PM
Response to Original message |
9. I rather like Barney Frank, myself. |
|
Edited on Sun Jul-22-07 04:41 PM by TahitiNut
:shrug: Tenacious, articulate, and focused ... I like that.
|
Disturbed
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-22-07 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
15. "What would make them more effective?" |
|
For starters, Conyers would not have "taken Impeachment off the table". He is no wuss. He is talkin' Inherent Contempt which would be immediate, not a long drawn out Court battle which would render normal Contempt moot. Conyers doesn't go around holding hands with Busholini. Just a few things off the top of my mind. I will think of more as the day progresses.
|
MonkeyFunk
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-22-07 05:13 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
|
are more emotionally satisfying, is it really "effective"?
Conyers has no more power to get 18 Republican senators to vote for removal than Pelosi does. He has no more power to get Republicans to override a veto than Pelosi does.
|
Individualist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-22-07 04:44 PM
Response to Original message |
13. Anyone who refuses to let DLC determine policy/actions |
|
Edited on Sun Jul-22-07 04:45 PM by notsodumbhillbilly
|
cyclezealot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-22-07 04:56 PM
Response to Original message |
18. I'd like to see David Bonior come back. |
Disturbed
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-22-07 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #18 |
22. Conyers would have more power to get Impeachment |
|
Proceedings started on Cheney, which Pelosi has never ever spoken about. Sometimes I suspect that the Regime has something over Pelosi that renders her compliant to the Fascists. I also beleive that Conyers would not have caved into Busholini on the Funding Bill.
|
sniffa
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-22-07 05:27 PM
Response to Original message |
|
i'd say russ feingoLd, but he's a senator.
|
Hubert Flottz
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-22-07 05:30 PM
Response to Original message |
|
She has been on the right track since the day Bush came to DC!
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 12:28 AM
Response to Original message |