Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Our Media Is Missing The Story Of The Century

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-23-07 09:01 AM
Original message
Our Media Is Missing The Story Of The Century
http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/07/23/our-media-is-missing-the-story-of-the-century

Our Media Is Missing the Story of the Century

By: Scarecrow
This morning, the White House is supposed to respond to the latest subpoenas from the House Judiciary Committee directing the White House to provide documents relating to Congress’ investigation into the mismanagement of the Department of Justice and White House interference in the political purging of US Attorneys. No doubt the White House’s Nixon-era impeachment attorney, Fred Fielding will eventually get around to telling the HJC that it will defy its subpoenas, just as the White House has already defied subpoenas for other documents and for the appearance and testimony of Harriet Miers and other White House officials. Yet there was virtually no mention of this on Sunday’s talking head shows.

More ominously, on Friday the WH told Congress it will order the Justice Department to disregard Congress if it tries to hold recalcitrant Administration officials in contempt, even though Congress has every right under the Constitution to expect the Department of Justice to enforce Congressional subpoenas. We need to be very clear about what this latest WH defiance means: the White House believes the Justice Department does not have an obligation to uphold the law on behalf of the Congress of the United States; instead, DoJ exists solely as a legal arm to shield the President and his staff from all efforts to hold them accountable under the law. Or course, the Attorney General, a man without honor or sense of legal decency, will do nothing to overturn the WH capture of America’s Justice Department.

As the New York Times lead editorial recognized Sunday, the Bush White House is now in complete and open defiance of all lawful Congressional efforts to hold the executive accountable for misconduct and possible crimes committed by members of the White House staff. Just as Bush claimed he had an inherent right to disregard Congressional statutes (e.g., FISA, the Geneva Conventions, signing statements) and the First, Fourth, and Fifth Amendments, or to cover up WH complicity in crimes (via commuting Scooter Libby’s prison term), the President is now claiming he can ignore any Congressional oversight of White House misconduct.

- snip -

The traditional media can’t seem to get their heads around how dangerously unAmerican this is and how serious a threat it poses to our constitutional framework...

- snip -

Too many in the media seem either in denial or blissfully ignorant that we are headed for an unavoidable showdown to determine whether the constitutional principle of checks and balances will survive. That’s the principle that stands between democratic government that respects the limits of government power so as to safeguard individual liberties against government encroachment, and a very different concept of government that recognizes no limits on the executive’s ability to slide into potential tyranny. In this showdown America will decide whether the rule of law applies to the executive or whether we move inexorably towards an unaccountable executive — in essence, a monarchy in which there is no meaningful check on the President’s power and no meaningful oversight of his actions while he remains in office. And if that doesn’t interest you as political news people, you’re in the wrong profession.

MORE

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-23-07 09:04 AM
Response to Original message
1. K&R Sadly, it appears our media is no more than a propaganda branch of the executive office.
Edited on Mon Jul-23-07 09:51 AM by spanone
there's a big difference between 'missing' and ignoring.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-23-07 09:08 AM
Response to Original message
2. It is the story of our country's demise. Kicked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-23-07 09:08 AM
Response to Original message
3. It now makes me wonder if Impeachment was started, if it would get any coverage at all.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
americanstranger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-23-07 09:56 AM
Response to Reply #3
18. Oh, it would get coverage...
...but they'd probably come up with a graphics package that headlined it as 'Assault On Democracy' or some such.

The media is complicit in Bush's illegality, since they all want the same thing - control, consumerism, and a bunch of happy, oblivious sheep for a populace.

- as
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-23-07 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #18
28. Danger from Within! Enemies Domestic (oops, I mean Homeland)! TREASON!
See, I can write headlines for the Right too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-23-07 09:09 AM
Response to Original message
4. It is a mystery why the media is not focused on this one matter
This makes missing blond haired teenagers look like the tripe it is. This is an evolving story that they could sink their teeth into and the first one to do it right is going to knock the ratings numbers right out of the ballpark. Then, and only then, they will all get on board.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-23-07 09:11 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. It is no more a mystery than
it was election night 2000 and the way the media handled calling Florida for Gore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bananarepublican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-23-07 09:32 PM
Response to Reply #7
39. 'The media' is Joseph Geobbel's Ministry of Propaganda reincarnate! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
datasuspect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-23-07 09:10 AM
Response to Original message
5. did you read harry potter?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-23-07 09:13 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. That's another thing... the business plan for the MSM
calls for the news to be entertaining. High crimes and misdemeanors are not entertainment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Le Taz Hot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-23-07 09:11 AM
Response to Original message
6. They're not missing it.
It just that it doesn't involve a blow job. Or Paris Hilton. Or missing white women. Or diapered astronauts. Or . . There ARE priorities, you know. :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-23-07 09:12 AM
Response to Original message
8. WHO at the WH said that on Friday? I think part of the reason the
MSM is not reporting this story right now is because it doesn't seem to be something Shrub actually stated, but perhapse a trial balloon to see who strong the reaction might be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zensea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-23-07 09:20 AM
Response to Original message
10. The New York Times is traditional media, so premise is false
Edited on Mon Jul-23-07 09:22 AM by Zensea

"The traditional media can’t seem to get their heads around how dangerously unAmerican this is and how serious a threat it poses to our constitutional framework..."


Yet


As the New York Times lead editorial recognized Sunday, the Bush White House is now in complete and open defiance of all lawful Congressional efforts to hold the executive accountable for misconduct and possible crimes committed by members of the White House staff. Just as Bush claimed he had an inherent right to disregard Congressional statutes (e.g., FISA, the Geneva Conventions, signing statements) and the First, Fourth, and Fifth Amendments, or to cover up WH complicity in crimes (via commuting Scooter Libby’s prison term), the President is now claiming he can ignore any Congressional oversight of White House misconduct.

Those two statements contradict each other.
If the New York Times in its lead editorial calls attention to this and recognizes it then the traditional media (or at least some of it) has got their heads around it.

I'm a bit surprised that Scarecrow at Firedoglake is making this mistake given the generally high level of discourse there.
I think it must be that people are letting their emotions get away with them in relation to the Bush administration and not thinking as rationally as they might usually.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-23-07 09:42 AM
Response to Reply #10
13. I would argue that Scarecrow is aware of that and the point would be that one editorial in what is
seen as a liberally-biased outlet (whether it is or not), when many don't even bother to read the editorial page, stills overall constitutes ignorance on the part of the mainstream media. To be extra-nitpicky, it is hyperbolic to call ANY story the story of the century, but that doesn't necessarily mean you shouldn't do it, using it as a literary device.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zensea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-23-07 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #13
16. Yes, a matter of degree
That is an argument that has some merit.

Just the same, I don't think the Times is the only place I've seen this discussed in the mainstream media.
One example I can think of immediately is Olbermann on Countdown who is part of the mainstream media.
Doesn't get much more mainstream than NBC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
creeksneakers2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-23-07 08:48 PM
Response to Reply #16
36. The kook page of the Wall Street Journal came out for Bush
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zensea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-23-07 10:17 PM
Response to Reply #36
40. LOL
Edited on Mon Jul-23-07 10:18 PM by Zensea
"Without secrecy, the government can't function. No one thinks conversations between federal judges and their clerks, or members of Congress and their staff, ought to be aired publicly without good reason. The same goes for presidents--even if their poll ratings are low."

Beautiful, just beautiful!
Who wrote that tripe?
Ah, yes John "torture" Yoo
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article11488.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
libertypirate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-23-07 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #10
17. Ah yes a bit of Sunday news segregation...

On Sunday you think the 30% he has left are reading the paper or their bible?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-23-07 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #10
38. NYT editorials don't matter.
Traditional media perhaps, but irrelevant traditional media. Only TV coverage--MASSIVE tv coverage--counts. If it ain't on the tube it ain't in the public awareness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beam Me Up Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-23-07 09:28 AM
Response to Original message
11. They aren't missing anything. Give me a break.
They aren't stupid. At this point, the media are not merely accessories after the fact, they have become PRINCIPALS in the crimes of conspiracy to commit and keep covered up acts of treason, mass murder, war crimes and crimes against humanity.

THEY KNOW DAMN WELL WHAT THEY ARE DOING and what they are doing is not merely protecting the Bush regime; they are in the process of dismantling and overturning the last vestiges of our Republic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nunyabiz Donating Member (504 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-23-07 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. You beat me to it
I was just about to say what you just did almost verbatim.

They aren't "missing" anything, they are 100% complicit in the crimes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mandate My Ass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-23-07 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #11
15. Thank you. There is *nothing* accidental about this omission
I forget who posted it but the media's biggest task right now is to purposely ignore all the crimes the Bush administration commits EVERY SINGLE DAY.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tatiana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-23-07 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #11
24. Absolutely. I wish I could recommend this reply.
The media knows EXACTLY what they are doing. Anyone who reads the Daily Howler or Media Matters knows that the "mainstream" media are complicit in Bush's hijacking of American democracy. The Daily Howler has a fascinating description of how the media manipulates, distracts, and misdirects the populace from important issues through the use of "trivia" (that is, inconsequential topics that have no relevance in political discourse - Edwards' haircut, Al Gore and Chilean bass, Hillary's makeover, etc.).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-23-07 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #11
25. The "Media" was complicit long before the Justice Dept. nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
senseandsensibility Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-23-07 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #11
26. Amen
I would hope that we all know that by now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raksha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-23-07 11:29 PM
Response to Reply #11
42. You are right. Sad but true...they are principals in the destruction
of our democracy, and ignoring the crimes of the Bush regime IS THEIR JOB!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-23-07 09:31 AM
Response to Original message
12. One thing it definitely shows
is...this country is full of idiots. People who went thru school without learning one fact. People who did not retain any thing they did learn. Back in the time when I was schooled in this country, we were taught about the Revoluntary War. We were taught about the constitution. We were taught about Americans who put our country first before profit and ass kissing the politic butt.

Maybe there is a break down in schooling. There is too much American Idol and not enough UNITED STATES.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim Sagle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-23-07 09:57 AM
Response to Original message
19. They're not missing it, they're killing it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim Sagle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-23-07 09:57 AM
Response to Original message
20. They're not missing it, they're killing it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trashcanistanista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-23-07 10:07 AM
Response to Original message
21. Already heard on my local indie radio station
about an hour ago - Bush orders Justice to not enforce comtempt charge. Not all media are silent on this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlGore-08.com Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-23-07 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
22. Yup, and I think Team Smirk is planning to take this all the way to the Supreme Court
When the Alito Court rules that the Constitution really says that we should have a King, and that the legislative branch should sit down and shut the f*ck up... will the media notice?

Will there be any outcry from the American people if the media doesn't notice?

Will Congress even try to do anything in response if there's no outcry from the American people?

Sick, sad times we're all living in...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-23-07 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
23. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Exultant Democracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-23-07 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
27. Haha, democracy...
ummmmm :yoiks:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donkeyotay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-23-07 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
29. Add it to their long list of missed stories
They missed all the fabrications told to get the war on: yellowcake, aluminum tubes, biochemical labs, centrifuges...I forget them all. They missed telling the public the truth about the UN resolutions. All of these stories could have been told, but weren't. They character assassinated Gore and propped up the current occupant. The dismissed global warming and told people who had lost their jobs to China to stop whining. Despite the sop thrown to us, sorry Keith, the media is complicit. They know who they work for, and it ain't us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-23-07 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. Blitzer said it to Michael Moore the other day: "This is a business..."
Don't forget the character assasination of John Kerry in 2004. Harped on it and harped on it. It was pathetic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-23-07 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
31. Kicked and recommended
Thanks for the thread Hissyspit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-23-07 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. Thanks for the k&r. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-23-07 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
33. They're IGNORING IT. They know damn well what happened today. PRAVDA works for the Gov.
not us.:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mnpaul Donating Member (754 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-23-07 06:07 PM
Response to Original message
34. The lead story on the top three today was....
the floods in London.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
abq e streeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-23-07 07:58 PM
Response to Original message
35. Missing, or intentionally ignoring?
As I mentioned in an earlier post, if we could just tie this story to one about a missing perky young white woman, we could get 24/7 coverage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-23-07 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
37. It's not denial, it's not ignorance. It's deliberate malfeasance.
If the story isn't reported, it will go away. Really, it will, just like all those other stories they didn't cover. They want it to go away. Their bosses want it to go away. They won't cover it, nobody will know it happened, and it won't have happened.

I believe this is why the Dems won't impeach. They know that if they try it, they will all be painted as traitors and lunatics. They don't want to expose themselves to the bath of vitriol that they will be immersed in if they dare to impeach.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cobalt-60 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-23-07 11:16 PM
Response to Original message
41. The BBC World Service has become my source for US news
They traditionally provide information to people under fascist occupation.
American journalism is dead.
As I'm pushing 50, they have insufficient time to regain my respect.
The Corporate Dick Cheeses that hope to attract my attention to the the Republicon propaganda they call "news" can kiss my ample caucasian ass. It's already too late for them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
farmboxer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-23-07 11:56 PM
Response to Original message
43. MSM did not ever cover the coups!
FSTV and LINK TV are the only things on TV to watch. 9410 and 9415 Dish Net, don't think DirecTV has it, perhaps LINK? I went to Dish Net to get FSTV. Only think on MSM is Keith Olbermann, I watch it every day!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-24-07 01:14 AM
Response to Reply #43
44. I've got that, too DishNetwork and I also watch Olbermann every night. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 11:47 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC