Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Breaking: Miers, Bush Chief of Staff to face contempt charges

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-23-07 10:36 AM
Original message
Breaking: Miers, Bush Chief of Staff to face contempt charges
Edited on Mon Jul-23-07 10:39 AM by kpete
Breaking: Miers, Bush Chief of Staff to face contempt charges
Michael Roston
Published: Monday July 23, 2007



Former White House Counsel Harriet Miers and Joshua Bolten, the current Chief of Staff to President George W. Bush, will likely be charged with contempt by the House Judiciary Committee on Wednesday this week.

"This investigation, including the reluctant but necessary decision to move forward with contempt, has been a very deliberative process, taking care at each step to respect the Executive Branch’s legitimate prerogatives,” said Rep. John Conyers (D-MI), chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, in a statement. "I've allowed the White House and Ms. Miers every opportunity to cooperate with this investigation, either voluntarily or under subpoena. It is still my hope that they will reconsider this hard-line position, and cooperate with our investigation so that we can get to the bottom of this matter."

Through an attorney, Miers had had earlier stated that she does not fear contempt charges. She refused to comply with a subpoena and appear before the House Committee on July 12 as part of the investigation into the firing of 9 US Attorneys. Bolten also has failed to turn over documents sought by House Democrats. The Bush chief of staff was ordered to comply with the subpoena by 10 AM this morning.

http://rawstory.com/news/2007/Breaking_Miers_Bush_Chief_of_Staff_0723.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-23-07 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
1. K & R
Arrest these people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Diane R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-23-07 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
2. She doesn't fear contempt charges because her boyfriend (gw) will rescue her.
Just like with Libby, the fix is already in. I hope Conyers goes for Inherent Contempt....then let's see how brave Harriet really is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spotbird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-23-07 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
3. Yawn.
My grandkids will be out of college when the Robert's court rules that defiance of a Democratic subpoena is just fine for a Republican.

The grandkids aren't conceived yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
That Is Quite Enough Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-23-07 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
4. Take her down, Conyers!
:yourock:

They think they're above the law. It's time to prove them wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-23-07 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
5. They have to wait two days to charge her?
What's up with that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-23-07 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. I suspect just to be nice and let them have time to think it over and maybe reconsider
myself I say arrest her and he, for that matter the whole crew of traitors
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-23-07 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. In two days, she can make it down to Paraguay
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-23-07 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #5
18. I'm looking at the Judiciary committee site
And there is nothing scheduled for today. My guess is the committee will meet tomorrow and decide which contempt charges to bring and announce it on Wednesday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-23-07 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
6. just get the Sargent at arms to arrest them please.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-23-07 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
8. Contempt Of Congress? Ha!
Damn right Miers lawyers are laughing. This is exactly how they hoped things would play out. The "contempt" is handed to a booshie lackey in the First District and down the rabbit hole it goes. Or we get the judicial delay game...the case drags on. Stop screwing around...get these goons locked up on Inherent Contempt charges and make this regime really have to scramble.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spotbird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-23-07 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. It's over
we must accept the reality that the Democrats are not going to do anything that matters. I can't shake my denial either, but it's the fact.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-23-07 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. Perhaps. And perhaps this is a deliberate trap.
Some legal scholars have mentioned that if B*sh
tries to intervene in this Contempt of Congress matter,
THAT will be very clear and direct grounds for impeachment.

Time will tell how this all plays out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-23-07 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #11
19. No
I will not accept that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jhain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-23-07 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
10. Well, it's about f'n TIME!! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woodsprite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-23-07 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #10
14. If it's not inherent contempt, it's just gonna go down the memory hole. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
endarkenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-23-07 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
12. Good! Then the DOJ will refuse to act. Then? nt.
Edited on Mon Jul-23-07 10:54 AM by endarkenment
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ozymandius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-23-07 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #12
17. Then they will pursue Inherent Contempt.
This takes the case out of the DoJ's hands. The Sargent at Arms of the House will arrest them. They will be placed in a cell inside the Capital building, arraigned and tried in the House.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
C_U_L8R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-23-07 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #12
21. Once the DOJ refuses to act... it's obstruction & conspiracy time
and that means chimpeachment baby !!! eep eep !!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-23-07 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. CHIMPEACHMENT BABY!!
Just wanted to affirm it :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-23-07 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
15. And what happened to the Condi subpoena? All gone? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
garybeck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-23-07 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #15
22. me wonder about that too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-23-07 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
16. k&r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
C_U_L8R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-23-07 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
20. Ooooh delicious
How about a little disbarment for the contemptuous little battleaxe
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 10th 2024, 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC