testing a theory based on observations

[Lerkfish]

please indicate which inclusive groups intersect

[Az]

1. What about neutrals?

Do you have to be pro or anti someone?

[Lerkfish]

2. good point, but I was running out of spaces for permutations.

additionally, I was more interested in those who were decidedly NOT neutral, because I thought I saw a pattern of enthusiams.

[wuushew]

3. pro, Kucinich, against

:dem:

[Tunkamerica]

4. no pro impeachment anti-clinton pro-sheehan?

and you could take out the "i've lost track" for a neutral pro/anti impeachment...which I would vote for if it was a choice.

[Lerkfish]

7. good point, sorry

I was typing them in and personally lost track of which ones I'd already typed and realized I couldn't get every one in anyways.

[rucky]

5. forgot Pro-impeachment, Anti-Clinton, Pro-Sheehan

and I have a theory that that is the theory you were testing.

[Lerkfish]

9. heh.

seems I inadvertantly left out what would have been my own choice.

[Richard Steele]

13. My choice as well. nm

[bryant69]

6. It might be better to contrast the mainstream candidates like

Edwards and Obama too vs. candidates like, well, Kucinich.

Bryant
Check it out --> http://politicalcomment.blogspot.com

[Lerkfish]

8. well, not enough permutations, and not relevant to my observations

[bryant69]

10. I assume your theory is that an opposition to Impeachment and Sheehan

Tracks well against support for Clinton? Forgiv e me if I'm being presumptious.

Bryant

[Lerkfish]

12. well, to be honest, I wasn't entirely sure

but I was noticing some folks I'd noticed were strong in support of Clinton seemed just as strong against Sheehan and just as strong against impeachment, but the poll seems to be leading in a different direction, so my observations may have been more anecdotal than trend-indicative

I presumed the winning combo would be:

Anti-impeachment
Pro-clinton
anti-sheehan.

but, hey, I'm open to admit I may be wrong.

[LostInAnomie]

11. Pro Edwards, Anti-Sheehan