RB TexLa
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-23-07 07:44 PM
Original message |
Poll question: Is this you tube debate setup the stupidest thing you've ever seen? |
DeposeTheBoyKing
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-23-07 07:45 PM
Response to Original message |
1. The stupidest thing I've ever seen is the freaking do-nothing Congress |
rurallib
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-23-07 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
3. I hope you understand that is caused by republiklans |
DeposeTheBoyKing
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-23-07 08:52 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
10. I'm referring to impeachment (or lack thereof) |
|
I'm not blaming the Democrats for failure to get us out of Iraq (YET).
|
Raine
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-23-07 07:48 PM
Response to Original message |
2. If gives the "average" person a chance |
|
to ask questions instead of the media with questions that are same old same old. :shrug:
|
NYC Liberal
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-23-07 08:18 PM
Response to Original message |
4. I think the problem is not the idea or the format |
|
The problem is that you have the corporate media filtering questions. They ought to have done it by VOTES.
|
Jack Bone
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-23-07 08:35 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
5. I agree...why did they have the videos voted on?? |
matcom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-23-07 08:38 PM
Response to Original message |
6. thought it was wonderful |
|
and yes, they filtered the questions but the questions were genuine and they couldn't filter the questioners or their thoughts. i'm impressed.
sorry you can't be satisfied with anything in this world.
|
trumad
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-23-07 08:39 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
7. He's getting slaughtered in his own poll. |
matcom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-23-07 08:41 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
LWolf
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-23-07 08:40 PM
Response to Original message |
|
"Great" is only reached when every candidate is given equal time on every question.
Taking questions from the general public is the first step to "great," though. Most questions were good.
|
ComerPerro
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-23-07 08:55 PM
Response to Original message |
11. Nice ideas, but the primaries are mostly meaningless |
|
No point in backing a candidate until 2008. Its not like primary votes really mean shit. I've never even been able to vote in one.
|
JeffR
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-23-07 08:56 PM
Response to Original message |
12. For a first-time experiment, it was pretty good |
|
but there were too many questions, necessitating the usual abbreviated soundbite answers. And there was way too big an imbalance in the amount of time different candidates got to speak at all.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri May 10th 2024, 09:24 PM
Response to Original message |