why was there no impeachment question

[sabbat hunter]

its simple, this was a PRESIDENTIAL debate. what would these candidates do as president. that has nothing to do with impeaching bush because they wouldnt be doing that as President of the US.

[bdamomma]

1. they would need a another two hours to answer that.

[mmonk]

2. It would let us know their character.

If I don't know that, I don't intend to vote for them.

[southerncrone]

7. Well, you know that Kucinich supports impeachment.

He introduced HR 333 to impeach Cheney first.
DK has a very good character, so you have a candidate you can support.

[mmonk]

8. You are correct and I support him.

[southerncrone]

10. Isn't it too bad that he's too short to be president?

:sarcasm:

[mmonk]

11. Yep.

And he looks like an elf (was in a hit piece some writer did and was repeated in GD politics).

[AndyTiedye]

12. Yes It Is Too Bad

Size does matter, unfortunately.

[TahitiNut]

13. Yeah ... it's all those 10' basketball nets in the White House.

:eyes:


"Short people got no reason to ..." :puke:


By the way ... just how tall is Hillary? :evilgrin:

[HiFructosePronSyrup]

3. If they won't support impeachment, why should I support them?

[ORDagnabbit]

4. because the corporate media which controls this single party state doesnt want it. n/t

[Zomby Woof]

5. Because it's a DU masturbation fantasy

[Individualist]

6. The #1 question would have made Hillary look bad, and the neocon propagandists

will allow nothing that would make Hillary look bad.

[debbierlus]

9. You clearly didn't watch my video

It had EVERYTHING to do with the future of the United States - because the second half of the question was how would NOT impeaching impact the abuse of future Presidential powers...