Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Schumer Rips Gonzales Over Contradictory Reponses On Spying Program

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-24-07 11:49 AM
Original message
Schumer Rips Gonzales Over Contradictory Reponses On Spying Program
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/07/24/schumer-rips-gonzales/

Schumer Rips Gonzales Over Contradictory Reponses On Spying Program

Under direct and strident questioning from Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY), Alberto Gonzales was unable to fully resolve his contradictory statements regarding the administration’s spying activities. Gonzales said that he misspoke when he said at a press conference in June that he and former deputy attorney general James Comey were referring to the same warrantless wiretapping program.

“I clarified my statement two days later with the reporter,” Gonzales told Schumer. “What did you say to the reporter?” Schumer asked. “I did not speak directly to the reporter,” replied Gonzales.

“Ok,” Schumer continued, “what did your spokesperson say to the reporter?” “I don’t know,” Gonzales said. Schumer then summed up the exchange:

In all due respect, you’re just saying, well, it was clarified with the reporter and you don’t even know what he said. You don’t even know what the clarification is. Sir, how you can say that you should stay on as Attorney General when we go through exercises like this where you’re bobbing and weaving and ducking to avoid admitting that you deceived the Committee?

Watch it at link~

Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-VT) noted that Gonzales never sought to inform Congress to clarify the contradictions in his responses on the administration’s warrantless spying activities.

Leahy concluded the interrogation, saying, “I’m going to ask for a review both of what Mr. Comey said and what Mr. Gonzales said. If there’s a discrepancy here in sworn testimony, we’re going to have to ask who’s telling the truth.”
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-24-07 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
1. Inherent contempt or Congress. Argumentative via obfuscation and non-responsive
This AG is an embarrassment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-24-07 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. No. He's a criminal involved in a conspiracy to subvert democracy.
He's a traitor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-24-07 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
3. Ripping is fine. But it's perjury and he should be charged with it.
Of course, first he should be impeached and convicted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Grandrose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-24-07 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
4. To bad Gonzales do not know history of Repubs!
Watergate Scrapbook: What Do You Remember?
Of FBI Director L. Patrick Gray: "Let him hang there; let him twist slowly, slowly in the wind." John Dean. "There's a cancer on the presidency." ...
:popcorn: :kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wiggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-24-07 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
5. Listen to replay of Hartmann's radio show...re new interpretation of testimony
He's dissecting Comey's testimony and Gonzales's today and believes there's a second secret surveillance program that hasn't been discussed except in a roundabout way. He believes the rush to Ashcroft's bedside is not about the domestic program we're somewhat familiar with...

This makes some sense in a variety of ways...but to me whenever I hear an admission of guilt from the WH, as happened with domestic spying, I'm immediately suspicious that there's more to the story and that all the fireworks are meant to hide a bigger misdeed. There's a purpose to the admission beyond coming clean...coming clean has not ever, EVER been a strong point of the WH.

Something else is going on here...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-24-07 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Check this out:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frustratedlady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-24-07 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
6. I don't think they would be so insistent on covering up this 2nd "program"..
if it had to do with terrorists. I think it had to do with spying on Dems and the media....maybe even bloggers. JMHO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 02:49 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC