Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Goatse" image seen on screen during CNN/YouTube debate

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Newsjock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-24-07 01:16 PM
Original message
"Goatse" image seen on screen during CNN/YouTube debate
Edited on Tue Jul-24-07 01:16 PM by Newsjock
http://duggmirror.com/2008_us_elections/LIVE_NATIONWIDE_CNN_YouTube_debate_GOATSE_D_on_LIVE_TV_PICTURES

When CNN and YouTube decided to pair up and merge the mediums of television and internet, neither companies quite expected to get all the baggage that comes with user-submitted, online-oriented content. This time, that baggage came in the form of a hidden online secret image, lovingly labeled “GOATSE,” based on the original website “goatse.cx.”

“GOATSE” refers to an image that began circulating the internet and infiltrating innocent users’ internet explorer windows as early as January 2000. But what makes this image so unique is its inherently offensive nature - redacted by Newsjock.

And despite an extensive screening and thorough analyzation of the videos submitted on behalf of YouTube and CNN alike, the image still made it under the radar and into tonight’s debate.

The incident in question came during a question about our nation’s healthcare system. The user who submitted the video was speaking innocuously into the camera when the image of “goatse” was flashed for the briefest moment in 1/24th of a second, ranging just above the framerate treshhold with which television broadcasts.

WARNING: If you click on this link, you will see a picture of the screen shot from CNN, which is VERY NOT SAFE FOR WORK. WARNING.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
meegbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-24-07 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. ...
:wow:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dogmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-24-07 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
2. Comcast blocks Goatse
Small favors, right?

I first saw it bundled with Tubgirl and a few other delicacies, in some spam I got, circa 2000 -- but only IIRC. But I do RC that I got the same item of spam nearly 30 times.

Set my therapy back weeks.

Vile stuff, ain't it?

--p!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RebelOne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-24-07 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. I've seen Tubgirl. Totally disgusting.
I had that image in my head for weeks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoodleyAppendage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-24-07 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #2
19. Tubgirl - is that the one with the broom stick? It's fake (I hope).
J
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thereismore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-24-07 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
3. What's in that image? nf
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lse7581011 Donating Member (948 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-24-07 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Here's What I Found
Goatse.cx,<1> was one of the best-known shock sites that existed, featuring an image, hello.jpg, of a man stretching his anus with his hands.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-24-07 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. I can't kick the link, I'm @ work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-24-07 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. If you really want to know I can describe it and save you the memory
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Az Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-24-07 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. Do not ask to see Goatse, if anyone gets the image at their work there could be trouble
Goatse was a single photo web page that was used in various debate forums to effectively shut down any further discussion. It is a photo of a man bent over with distended testicle stretching his anus extremely wide such that you can see quite a ways down. It is one of the more visceral and disgusting images to ever come from the net (there are worse trust me do not google tub girl). And its point was to so overwhelm a thread with disgust as to shut discussion down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
racaulk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-24-07 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #3
15. It looked kinda like this...


Just imagine that this picture is of a man's anus, and there you have it.

Gross stuff.

:scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Az Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-24-07 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. There is a subset of the Goatse crowd that tracks these images down
Anything that is reminiscent of the original is captured and enshrined.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TroglodyteScholar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-24-07 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #15
24. Ok NOW I'm laughing n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojorabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-24-07 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
4. OMG
I guess I am really naive...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-24-07 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
5. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sniffa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-24-07 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
11. gotta come back after work
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-24-07 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
12. Tinky Falwell did it.
:D



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-24-07 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #12
21. Swamp Rat - you rascal you.
Too funny.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-24-07 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
13. That's still floating around out there?
I'm not gonna click on that link, I still remember it far to well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Az Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-24-07 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. The official site was sold off
But the image still exists out there in the wild.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thereismore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-24-07 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
17. I'm so naive, I didn't know what I was looking at. I saw it now - did I really
need that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wellst0nev0ter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-24-07 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
18. I Remember Unknowingly Clicking That Link In A Public Computer Lab
good times :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-24-07 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
20. Can't we file complaints with the FCC? I'd much rather see Janet's nipple.
A massive brazillion dollar fine is in order.

.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Feron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-24-07 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. No.
Cable isn't under the FCC's content jurisdiction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Newsjock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-24-07 04:20 PM
Response to Original message
22. UPDATE: Possibly a hoax
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Az Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-24-07 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. I am going with the hoax claim
The graphic is not properly aligned according to the background image. Its squared rather than at an angle similar to the screen it is supposed to be on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 09:43 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC