Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

2 Bush Aides to Face Contempt Citations (AP)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Eugene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 03:42 AM
Original message
2 Bush Aides to Face Contempt Citations (AP)
Source: Associated Press

2 Bush Aides to Face Contempt Citations

Wednesday July 25, 2007 9:31 AM

By LAURIE KELLMAN

Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON (AP) - Heading toward a separation-of-powers
showdown, House Democrats prepared contempt of Congress
citations against two White House aides who have refused to
comply with subpoenas for information on the abrupt firings
of federal prosecutors.

The White House has said that Chief of Staff Josh Bolten and
former legal counselor Harriet Miers, among other top advisers
to President Bush, are absolutely immune from subpoenas
because their documents and testimony are protected by
executive privilege.

House Judiciary Committee Democrats, led by Rep. John
Conyers, D-Mich., reject that claim and have drafted for a
vote Wednesday a resolution citing Miers and Bolten with
contempt of Congress, a federal misdemeanor punishable by
up to a $100,000 fine and a one-year prison sentence.

The panel's vote is the first step on the road to a possible
constitutional showdown in federal court.

-snip-

Read more: http://www.guardian.co.uk/worldlatest/story/0,,-6803738,00.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 04:31 AM
Response to Original message
1. Gee, the Conyers-Hating Club will be so disappointed!!
How dare he do the work of the people and not particularly want a load of assholes camping in his office while so doing!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Decruiter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 05:49 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. Let it rest. Peace. please. Don't keep fanning flames. Thanks a mill....
Have a great Wednesday, "hump day", right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radfringe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 04:36 AM
Response to Original message
2. Are they willing to take the next step?
with each story about contempt charges being filed, or just 3 more signatures for impeachment - my hopes are raised and then dashed

it's like being on a roller coaster with missing tracks at the end of the BIG DROP

Are they prepared to move forward and take the next step? If not - then this is just noise
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 04:48 AM
Response to Original message
3. Today should be an interesting day
http://judiciary.house.gov/schedule.aspx

Scheduled events for dates
7/25/2007 - 7/25/2007

Wednesday 07/25/2007 - 10:15 AM
2141 Rayburn House Office Building
Full Committee
Meeting to consider: a resolution and report recommending to the House of Representatives that former White House Counsel Harriet Miers and White House Chief of Staff Joshua Bolten be cited for contempt of Congress
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Senator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 05:41 AM
Response to Original message
4. I Think It's A Mistake
Yes, Even Inherent Contempt. This is why I've been chanting "only impeachment" for so long.

At best this is another procedural dead end. They've really got no problem letting Harriet or Fredo sit a cell (ask Judy Miller) -- in fact, that's what figureheads are for. It would have to be an old white guy -- like Scooter -- to get them to risk anything. But still, the pardon pen is properly poised.

But that's not the real problem. I think they may well be looking for any opportunity to "BushvGore" their "Unitary" delusions into "reality." And any issue will do. That's why they've been so "inexplicably" confrontive. They want something to trot up to the New Felonious Five for an "Enabling Decision."

They're not the least bit interested in "constitutional niceties." They believe them to be as "quaint" as torture bans.

They should be treated as the "fugitive" war criminals that they are. Poking them with legal sticks -- based on laws they scoff at -- is not a recipe for successful return to constitutional law.

Once again, the DC Dems are showing up with a knife to a gunfight.

==
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 12:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC