Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Judge rules against government in warrantless surveillance cases

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 08:07 AM
Original message
Judge rules against government in warrantless surveillance cases
Judge rules against government in warrantless surveillance cases
July 24, 2007

PORTLAND, Maine --A federal judge in California ruled Tuesday against the federal government's attempts to stop investigations in five states of President Bush's domestic spying program.

Sign up for: Globe Headlines e-mail | Breaking News Alerts U.S. District Chief Judge Vaughn Walker last winter was assigned to hear arguments in the federal government's attempt to stop Maine regulators from forcing Verizon to say whether it provided customer call records to the government without a warrant. Similar cases in Missouri, New Jersey, Connecticut and Vermont were combined with the Maine case.

The Department of Justice was seeking to stop the investigations of phone records based on the Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution, the foreign affairs power of the federal government and the state secrets privilege.

In a 35-page ruling, Walker dismissed the government's request to stop the investigations, ruling that neither the Supremacy Clause nor the foreign affairs power of the government prevented a state from asking about phone records.

more at:
http://www.boston.com/news/local/vermont/articles/2007/07/24/judge_rules_against_government_in_warrantless_surveillance_cases/?rss_id=Boston.com+%2F+News
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Jim__ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 08:25 AM
Response to Original message
1. We need judges who will stand up to this administration.
I hope this judges ruling stands.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Auntie Bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 08:25 AM
Response to Original message
2. For once we have good news. It's a rare thing these days. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 03:16 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC