Greeby
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 08:17 AM
Original message |
Cheney Impeachment: And then there were 15 |
|
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d110:HE00333:@@@N Rep Clay, Wm. Lacy - 5/1/2007 Rep Schakowsky, Janice D. - 5/1/2007 Rep Wynn, Albert Russell - 5/10/2007 Rep Clarke, Yvette D. - 6/6/2007 Rep Lee, Barbara - 6/7/2007 Rep Woolsey, Lynn C. - 6/7/2007 Rep Waters, Maxine - 6/12/2007 Rep Johnson, Henry C. "Hank," Jr. - 6/28/2007 Rep Ellison, Keith - 6/28/2007 Rep McDermott, Jim - 7/10/2007 Rep Moran, James P. - 7/10/2007 Rep Farr, Sam - 7/12/2007 Rep Filner, Bob - 7/12/2007 Rep Brady, Robert A. - 7/24/2007
:applause:
|
Richard Steele
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 08:18 AM
Response to Original message |
babylonsister
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 08:18 AM
Response to Original message |
2. "It's like pulling teeth" - now I know what that means. nt |
5X
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 08:18 AM
Response to Original message |
3. I will k and r that. n/t |
porphyrian
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 08:19 AM
Response to Original message |
4. So, two more and Conyers will do it? |
Hissyspit
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 08:25 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
5. Here is transcript and video of what Conyers said in San Diego: |
KharmaTrain
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 08:41 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
10. When The Polls Start Climbing Over 60% |
|
Last poll, over 50% favored cheney's impeachment...the chimpster isn't that far behind...but it's still not enough to move some off center on this topic. Now, if new polls start showing 60% or more in favor of a cheney impeachment, I am sure you're gonna see more sponsors and interest in getting the popular support to start hearings and write articles of impeachment on crashcart. The roadblock remains having a direct crime that can be hung on "shooter"...since the evidence is hidden behind "Executive privilidge". Let's get inherent contempt charges on members of this regime and shatter this stonewall...on the other side are cheney and bush's criminal indictments and the popular and political support to ensure a successful impeachment and conviction.
|
jtrockville
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 08:28 AM
Response to Original message |
6. Show him some love: LINK |
jtrockville
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 08:36 AM
Response to Reply #6 |
7. Arrrrgh! The "contribute" button is broken :( |
sicksicksick_N_tired
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 08:40 AM
Response to Original message |
Fiendish Thingy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 08:40 AM
Response to Original message |
9. Where is Brady from ? NT |
Toots
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 08:41 AM
Response to Original message |
11. Not one single Co-Sponsor to the Clinton Impeachment |
|
Fifteen so far and counting for getting rid of Cheney. Why would Conyers say he needs seventeen before proceding?
|
Solly Mack
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 08:42 AM
Response to Original message |
12. Is it out of sub-committee yet? |
Greeby
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 08:57 AM
Response to Reply #12 |
13. You'll have to get on Nadler's case for that nt |
Solly Mack
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 08:59 AM
Response to Reply #13 |
14. I'm aware of who is on the sub-committee |
|
just asking a question, and I'm assuming from your response, the answer is no
|
The Stranger
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 09:04 AM
Response to Original message |
15. Reason Number 5,429,209 to impeach. |
|
Maybe if Nancy would put Impeachment back on the table, the drip-drip-drip would become a deluge.
|
lonestarnot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 09:21 AM
Response to Original message |
16. still waiting and watching. |
realbluesky
(115 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 10:04 AM
Response to Original message |
17. Can anybody tell me why the dems are so reluctant to do their duty? |
|
I have read a lot about impeachment and the dems reluctance to pursue this action, but I have yet to read anything that makes any sense as to why they are reluctant to do so. I am willing to listen to any reasonable argument. But in my way of thinking, serious crimes have been committed. It is the duty of the House of Representatives to bring impeachment charges against the criminals. If they don't do it, they are not doing their duty.
America needs leaders not politicians who wait for the polls to swing before they do their jobs.
|
cynatnite
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 10:06 AM
Response to Original message |
18. Out of 233 dems... n/t |
Mandate My Ass
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 10:09 AM
Response to Original message |
19. Philly in the hizz-ouse |
|
WTG, Bob Brady. :applause:
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri May 10th 2024, 10:50 PM
Response to Original message |