Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

*** Official House Judiciary Hearing on Contempt Thread 1 ***

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 09:09 AM
Original message
*** Official House Judiciary Hearing on Contempt Thread 1 ***
Come join the fried Bolten and baked Miers. 5 minutes to go

10:15 EDT

cspan3 http://www.cspan.org/watch/cs_cspan3_wm.asp?Cat=TV&Code=CS3

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
unhappycamper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 09:10 AM
Response to Original message
1. you can also get the hearing on the judiciary web site
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 09:10 AM
Response to Original message
2. Thanks for the link and alerting me to this.
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 09:11 AM
Response to Original message
3. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 09:12 AM
Response to Original message
4. Has it started?
So far, I'm seeing a presser with Musharaff
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 09:14 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. No. Starts at 10:15 ET...1 minute to go!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 09:13 AM
Response to Original message
5. I'm ready!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oldgrowth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 09:13 AM
Response to Original message
6. Why are most of the hot ones on cspan3??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spotbird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 09:15 AM
Response to Reply #6
12. When congress is in session ,
I & II are required to cover the floor, if there is something going on there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrMickeysMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 09:15 AM
Response to Reply #6
13. Um, to keep the unwashed masses ignorant? Just guessing
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 09:21 AM
Response to Reply #13
29. Ding Ding Ding
I'd don't even get in on my cable and I'm pretty much upper tier.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrMickeysMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 09:23 AM
Response to Reply #29
34. Me, too!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 09:16 AM
Response to Reply #6
15. Legal contracts
C-Span has to cover the house and senate when they're in session. Therefore, the other stuff happens on C-Span 3
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kma3346 Donating Member (423 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 09:16 AM
Response to Reply #6
16. Easy answer to that one!
I'm pretty sure that it's because that's the only one you can't see on the TV. You have to view it on the Internet. (Correct me if I'm wrong, anyone...)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 09:17 AM
Response to Reply #6
19. C-SPAN 1 is for the House legislative business and C-SPAN 2 is for Senate legislative business and
when either chamber is in session, C-SPAN must cover them. That's why C-SPAN exists. C-SPAN 3 is for all the hearings and any other political issues that don't happen in the House and Senate.:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oldgrowth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 09:22 AM
Response to Reply #19
31. Thanks ,they need to put span3 on TV
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 09:27 AM
Response to Reply #31
45. It IS on Teevee! Ask your cable company to make it available. That's what I did and am now going to
Edited on Wed Jul-25-07 09:27 AM by in_cog_ni_to
be getting it STARTING ON SEPTEMBER 18 !!!!!!!!:bounce::bounce:

I emailed them and explained how beneficial C-SPAN 3 would be to the Citizens and ESPECIALLY in our schools so the children can see how their government operates 'in real time' and it worked! I cannot WAIT!

Email and call your cable company! Mine is Comcast.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 09:14 AM
Response to Original message
8. ready and streaming
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buttercup McToots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 09:15 AM
Response to Original message
9. Ready....Set....
Go!!:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 09:15 AM
Response to Original message
10. Just starting, people still coming in
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 09:15 AM
Response to Original message
11. Get your snacks ready...it's about to begin
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Subdivisions Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 09:16 AM
Response to Original message
14. And away we go! And hopefully,
Edited on Wed Jul-25-07 09:16 AM by Texas Explorer
away Bolton and Miers go...TO JAIL!

:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cspanlovr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 09:16 AM
Response to Original message
17. thank you, thank you, thank you for the heads up!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 09:17 AM
Response to Original message
18. Got my coffee and I'm HERE!
:woohoo:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 09:19 AM
Original message
Freshly ground French Roast here....
....need that boost to wake me up!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 09:22 AM
Response to Original message
32. "whatever is on sale" roast for me (fairly fresh right now). Think it is Columbian
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 09:27 AM
Response to Original message
46. oh, freshly ground! I'm drinking Albert Heijn Perla. Mmmmm!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 09:18 AM
Response to Original message
20. Ready and waiting to see the contempt citations issued!
Here on the West Coast ~~ with a fresh pot of coffee brewed and ready.

:hi: Morning, Everyone!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 09:19 AM
Response to Reply #20
22. You're here early!
:hi:

I'm an hour later than you :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 09:20 AM
Response to Reply #22
28. I am an early bird.....love the mornings.
Hope I end up loving this AM in particular.

I feel like a cheerleader: "Hold 'em, hold 'em, hold 'em in contempt!"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 09:24 AM
Response to Reply #28
39. oh the code pinkers probably will be there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 09:28 AM
Response to Reply #28
48. "knock 'em, sock 'em, Yes, yes, yes!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 09:18 AM
Response to Original message
21. this only needs a majority vote right?
will the rethugs fillibuster?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 09:22 AM
Response to Reply #21
30. They can't
The Congress doesn't do filibusters
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 09:28 AM
Response to Reply #21
49. No fillibusters in the House
In the Senate only
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VP505 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 09:19 AM
Response to Original message
23. Another
waste of time??? Sorry to sound cynical but they keep having hearings and nothing changes, Bu$hCo keeps lying, his apologists keep lying, the RePublics keep obstructing and lying and our troops are still dying. I'll try to cowboy up and have some hope that SOMETHING will get done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woodsprite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 09:19 AM
Response to Original message
24. Yup - got my coffee. No popcorn, so I had to go with animal crackers. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 09:35 AM
Response to Reply #24
78. Now there's an idea. Bush, Cheney, Gonzo, Harriet, et.al. animal crackers!
Difficult to swallow, fun to chew up and spit out! Keep away from children.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 09:20 AM
Response to Original message
25. checking in and ready to rumble!!...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 09:20 AM
Response to Original message
26. "headed toward a showdown"-------count will have to decide says Moderator (cspan)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jtrockville Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 09:20 AM
Response to Original message
27. Conyers has arrived.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 09:24 AM
Response to Reply #27
37. -the man of the day--has graveled in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 09:23 AM
Response to Original message
33. Don't forget that CSPAN has audio streams, too
if you can't watch or video is blocked by your job.

:headbang:
rocknation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 09:23 AM
Response to Original message
35. hey everyone got here just in time!!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 09:27 AM
Response to Reply #35
44. Morning.....!!
Great day to be on line!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrMickeysMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 09:29 AM
Response to Reply #35
51. Let's get ready (hopefully) to do something!
Hi, alyce douglas! :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 09:32 AM
Response to Reply #51
58. hey mrmickeysmom
gee, I am surprised I am at work and I can pick up the stream. Woo Hoo!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 09:29 AM
Response to Reply #35
52. Morning Alyce!!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 09:23 AM
Response to Original message
36. The horses are on the track
With love from Big Audio Dynamite
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woodsprite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 09:24 AM
Response to Reply #36
38. Sarah Miers? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 09:28 AM
Response to Reply #38
47. Big Audio Dynamite
The Bottom Line:


"The horses are on the track"

Theres a new dance thats going around
When the hits start flying you gotta get down
All the young people dance round the square
That old time groove is really nowhere

So when you reach the bottom line
The only thing to do is climb
Pick yourself up of the floor
Don`t know what you`re waiting for

A dance to the tune of economic decline
Is when you do the bottom line
Nagging questions always remain
Why did it happen and who was to blame?

When you reach the bottom line
The only thing to do is climb
Pick yourself up of the floor
Don`t know what you`re waiting for

The the the the the the horse the the horses are on the track

They`ve been doing it down at the zoo
And I can show ya heres what to do
All of the States and over UK
Even the Soviets are swinging away

When you reach the bottom line
The only thing to do is climb
Pick yourself up of the floor
Anything you want is yours

The road aheads` clear as a motorway
Give us this day our daily bread and send us on our way
Perchance to dream or take a holiday
Romeo oh Romeo
You gotta have your say

When you reach the bottom line
The only thing to do is climb
Pick yourself up off the floor
Don't know what you're waiting for

So when you reach the bottom line
The only thing to do is climb
Pick yourself up off the floor
Anything you want is yours

Part two - Part two
I`m gonna take you to part two part two
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 09:25 AM
Response to Reply #36
40. Resolution being read
without objection says Conyers. Let me begin...recommending that the house cite Miers and Bolton for contempt. Not a step I take easily or lightly....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 09:25 AM
Response to Original message
41. I got goose bumps just hearing the report being read
by the Clerk when she said about the issue of contempt!

<swoon>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 09:25 AM
Response to Original message
42. Clerk is reading the Report--REsolution for Contempt . HO HO its has BEGUN
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrMickeysMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 09:26 AM
Response to Original message
43. Conyers had a hard time say, "co-equal branch of govt."!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 09:29 AM
Response to Original message
50. "This is a confrontation we have not sought"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 09:30 AM
Response to Original message
53. looking ahead---I have not heard that Conyers will consider going the House
trial route. I keep hearing this will go to DC court which has a Bush appointee as judge.


What have you all heard.???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 09:30 AM
Response to Original message
54. Conyers previously:
The investigation "has uncovered serious evidence of wrongdoing by the department and White House staff," Conyers says.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 09:30 AM
Response to Original message
55. Says that they need to do this to preserve their rights
Because nobody will come to testify if they don't enforce this now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 09:30 AM
Response to Original message
56. they will not work with no one Chairman Conyers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrMickeysMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 09:31 AM
Response to Original message
57. Mr. Conyers, "congress's rights = people's rights!", sir
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 09:33 AM
Response to Reply #57
60. How can one state produce so much political trash? (Texas)
Lamar Smith is yet another piece of refuse for the pile.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
59. Smith, R of TX who is the Monority chair. I do not think he is online with Conyers!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 09:33 AM
Response to Reply #59
67. oh oh-----------the Mantra of "clinton did it" yugga ugggga!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 09:35 AM
Response to Reply #67
77. hey he stole our words---Smith saying the Majority is OUT OF TOUCH WITH REALITY!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PRETZEL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 09:35 AM
Response to Reply #59
76. That may be an understatement,
He's setting the tone for a very bitter meeting.

He's absoluteley wrong and has already set the tone the "Clinton did it more"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 09:35 AM
Response to Reply #59
81. The Clenis defense, of course..
:eyes: Just give it a rest Repukes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 09:33 AM
Response to Original message
61. LaMarr Smith....
...a Repuke from TX....is up and yammering about how bad Clinton was....and not addressing one damn issue. Big surprise...NOT!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 09:33 AM
Response to Original message
62. and he really thinks he's making a point (Smith)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrMickeysMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 09:33 AM
Response to Original message
63. Lamar, blaming Clinton and representing NO ONE from Tx, is no way to
... go through life.

ENOUGH OF THE CLINTON BULLSHIT!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 09:33 AM
Response to Original message
64. Lamar Smith compares Bush & Clinton again. No evidence of wrong doing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
InkAddict Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 09:33 AM
Response to Original message
65. A Compromise?
Would any authoritative body make compromises for any one of us should we just choose not to show up in response to a subpoena?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 09:33 AM
Response to Original message
66. Oh Lamar
Why don't you mention Nixon or Ronnie or Dubya's daddy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 09:34 AM
Response to Original message
68. Clinton Clinton Clinton Clinton right out of the gate- what a shock!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 09:34 AM
Response to Original message
69. Clinton Clinton Clinton Clinton Clinton Clinton. Not to mention Clinton, Clinton, Clinton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 09:34 AM
Response to Reply #69
74. LOL! GMTA!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 09:36 AM
Response to Reply #74
86. LOL!! :)
:yourock:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 09:37 AM
Response to Reply #69
91. Exactly....
....and assuming they are correct (which they are NOT) that Clinton did something wrong....how EXACTLY does that excuse the wrongs the azzhole has done?

GMAB!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 09:37 AM
Response to Reply #91
94. EXACTLY. I'll never understand their argument.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
A wise Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 09:34 AM
Response to Original message
70. LaMar Smith
on the attack of Clinton, rather than justic and the suspension of caging.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Subdivisions Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 09:34 AM
Response to Original message
71. As usual, Clinton did it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 09:34 AM
Response to Original message
72. Lamar Smith up making excuses for the psycho. This will be a partisan vote..right down the middle.
Good thing the Dems are the MAJORITY!!!!:rofl::rofl::rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 09:34 AM
Response to Original message
73. 3 executive orders is that right???
Edited on Wed Jul-25-07 09:35 AM by alyce douglas
oh, they have to bring up Clinton god, how many times are they going to play this over and over again.

oh, god here goes my blood pressure, what BS, get this guy off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woodsprite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 09:35 AM
Response to Reply #73
83. Maybe, but only because he does everything thru signing statements. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VP505 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 09:34 AM
Response to Original message
75. Here we go again
another Clinton bash, that like that's what they are they there for. What a tool!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrMickeysMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 09:35 AM
Response to Original message
79. Oh, so we should be satisfied with hearing from them NOT UNDER OATH?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 09:38 AM
Response to Reply #79
96. OF COURSE! We couldn't possibly have a TRAIL OF THE LIES THEY WOULD TELL!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 09:35 AM
Response to Original message
80. HOW MANY TIMES DID NIXON USE EXEC PRIVLEDGE...??
Edited on Wed Jul-25-07 09:36 AM by flyarm
HOW MANY TIMES DID REAGAN IN IRAN CONTRA??

we dems need to arm ourselves with that info!! at all times
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 09:35 AM
Response to Original message
82. WH offered to have Miers and Rove meet and answer their questions
Yeah, they did, with unacceptable terms. No transcript, can't call them back for anything, behind closed doors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 09:38 AM
Response to Reply #82
98. total BS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 09:35 AM
Response to Original message
84. the Pres claim of Exec Priviledge goes back to George Washington. UFB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 09:35 AM
Response to Original message
85. All the way back to Washington, Lamar?
When did Nixon change his name to George Washington?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 09:36 AM
Response to Original message
87. PATHETIC piece of shit! Clinton. It's ALWAYS about Clinton!
I hate these freaks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 09:36 AM
Response to Original message
88. Clenis Clenis Clenis Clenis Clenis!!!!! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
A wise Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
89. Right LAMAR
like your do nothing congress gave a shit on doing the right thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrMickeysMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
90. What a bunch of shit from Texas. I hope his ass is voted out...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
92. Smith is NO gentelman!!!----
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
93. My goodness, Lamar only omitted
the dangers of human/animal hybrids!

What a jackass! x(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_Leo_Criley Donating Member (553 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 09:38 AM
Response to Original message
95. Linda Sanchez!
" recommend that they be cited for contempt of congress."

That's right Linda!

:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wednesdays Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 09:38 AM
Response to Original message
97. Linda Sanchez up now
None too soon, what a relief.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 09:39 AM
Response to Original message
99. i just called Lamar's office i asked how many times did Reagan and Nixon use exec privledge??
PLEASE CALL HIS OFFICE AND ASK THE SAME QUESTIONS..HOW MANY TIMES FOR NIXON AND HOW MANY TIMES FOR REAGAN DURING IRAN CONTRA!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 09:41 AM
Response to Reply #99
106. Did they answer you? :) Let me guess....NO. Am I right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 09:39 AM
Response to Original message
100. Lamar Smith is bereft of integrity
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 09:39 AM
Response to Original message
101. THREAD 2 UP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 09:39 AM
Response to Original message
102. Code Pinkers are there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 09:40 AM
Response to Original message
103. Did all Repugs show up?--are the chairs full? anyone know?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 09:41 AM
Response to Original message
104. Oh, puke.........Cannon the asshole from Utah....
...is bloviating like a stuck pig. :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 09:41 AM
Response to Original message
105. "Administration will direct" DC USA to not prosecute .... HELLO that's impeachable.
I would think. With Sanchez, we are seeing how the Dems have done this correctly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 09:42 AM
Response to Reply #105
108. *** Official House Judiciary Hearing on Contempt Thread 2 ***
Edited on Wed Jul-25-07 09:43 AM by L. Coyote
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 09:41 AM
Response to Original message
107. Oh joy
Cannon is going to whine and rant for a while
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 09:42 AM
Response to Original message
109. YUK!!!! Cannon.....TOOL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
110. Chris Cannon says there "isn't much evidence"- HENCE THE SUBPOENAS YOU GODDAMN ASSHOLE!!!!!!!
I'm not gonna make it to the end of this hearing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 09:44 AM
Response to Original message
111. So, Rep. Cannon, you dumb asshole....a question for you, OK?
Edited on Wed Jul-25-07 09:45 AM by Hepburn
If the Rethugs in the WH did NOTHING wrong ~~ as you claim ~~ then WHY are they hiding behind a false claim of privilege in order to NOT discuss what went on?

And...so far....we STILL do NOT have the FACTS on how those names of the fired US Attys got on the list. Care to explain WHY that info is being hidden?

Duh.....:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC