MiniMe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 09:09 AM
Original message |
*** Official House Judiciary Hearing on Contempt Thread 1 *** |
|
Come join the fried Bolten and baked Miers. 5 minutes to go 10:15 EDT cspan3 http://www.cspan.org/watch/cs_cspan3_wm.asp?Cat=TV&Code=CS3
|
unhappycamper
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 09:10 AM
Response to Original message |
1. you can also get the hearing on the judiciary web site |
Drum
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 09:10 AM
Response to Original message |
2. Thanks for the link and alerting me to this. |
Solly Mack
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 09:11 AM
Response to Original message |
blogslut
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 09:12 AM
Response to Original message |
|
So far, I'm seeing a presser with Musharaff
|
in_cog_ni_to
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 09:14 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
7. No. Starts at 10:15 ET...1 minute to go! |
in_cog_ni_to
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 09:13 AM
Response to Original message |
oldgrowth
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 09:13 AM
Response to Original message |
6. Why are most of the hot ones on cspan3?? |
spotbird
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 09:15 AM
Response to Reply #6 |
12. When congress is in session , |
|
I & II are required to cover the floor, if there is something going on there.
|
MrMickeysMom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 09:15 AM
Response to Reply #6 |
13. Um, to keep the unwashed masses ignorant? Just guessing |
shadowknows69
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 09:21 AM
Response to Reply #13 |
|
I'd don't even get in on my cable and I'm pretty much upper tier.
|
MrMickeysMom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 09:23 AM
Response to Reply #29 |
blogslut
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 09:16 AM
Response to Reply #6 |
|
C-Span has to cover the house and senate when they're in session. Therefore, the other stuff happens on C-Span 3
|
kma3346
(423 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 09:16 AM
Response to Reply #6 |
16. Easy answer to that one! |
|
I'm pretty sure that it's because that's the only one you can't see on the TV. You have to view it on the Internet. (Correct me if I'm wrong, anyone...)
|
in_cog_ni_to
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 09:17 AM
Response to Reply #6 |
19. C-SPAN 1 is for the House legislative business and C-SPAN 2 is for Senate legislative business and |
|
when either chamber is in session, C-SPAN must cover them. That's why C-SPAN exists. C-SPAN 3 is for all the hearings and any other political issues that don't happen in the House and Senate.:)
|
oldgrowth
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 09:22 AM
Response to Reply #19 |
31. Thanks ,they need to put span3 on TV |
in_cog_ni_to
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 09:27 AM
Response to Reply #31 |
45. It IS on Teevee! Ask your cable company to make it available. That's what I did and am now going to |
|
Edited on Wed Jul-25-07 09:27 AM by in_cog_ni_to
be getting it STARTING ON SEPTEMBER 18 !!!!!!!!:bounce::bounce:
I emailed them and explained how beneficial C-SPAN 3 would be to the Citizens and ESPECIALLY in our schools so the children can see how their government operates 'in real time' and it worked! I cannot WAIT!
Email and call your cable company! Mine is Comcast.
|
Richard Steele
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 09:14 AM
Response to Original message |
Buttercup McToots
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 09:15 AM
Response to Original message |
MiniMe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 09:15 AM
Response to Original message |
10. Just starting, people still coming in |
Solly Mack
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 09:15 AM
Response to Original message |
11. Get your snacks ready...it's about to begin |
Subdivisions
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 09:16 AM
Response to Original message |
14. And away we go! And hopefully, |
|
Edited on Wed Jul-25-07 09:16 AM by Texas Explorer
away Bolton and Miers go...TO JAIL!
:popcorn:
|
cspanlovr
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 09:16 AM
Response to Original message |
17. thank you, thank you, thank you for the heads up! |
helderheid
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 09:17 AM
Response to Original message |
18. Got my coffee and I'm HERE! |
Hepburn
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 09:19 AM
Original message |
Freshly ground French Roast here.... |
|
....need that boost to wake me up!
|
rodeodance
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 09:22 AM
Response to Original message |
32. "whatever is on sale" roast for me (fairly fresh right now). Think it is Columbian |
helderheid
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 09:27 AM
Response to Original message |
46. oh, freshly ground! I'm drinking Albert Heijn Perla. Mmmmm! |
Hepburn
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 09:18 AM
Response to Original message |
20. Ready and waiting to see the contempt citations issued! |
|
Here on the West Coast ~~ with a fresh pot of coffee brewed and ready.
:hi: Morning, Everyone!
|
helderheid
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 09:19 AM
Response to Reply #20 |
|
:hi:
I'm an hour later than you :)
|
Hepburn
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 09:20 AM
Response to Reply #22 |
28. I am an early bird.....love the mornings. |
|
Hope I end up loving this AM in particular.
I feel like a cheerleader: "Hold 'em, hold 'em, hold 'em in contempt!"
|
bdamomma
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 09:24 AM
Response to Reply #28 |
39. oh the code pinkers probably will be there. |
helderheid
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 09:28 AM
Response to Reply #28 |
48. "knock 'em, sock 'em, Yes, yes, yes!" |
shadowknows69
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 09:18 AM
Response to Original message |
21. this only needs a majority vote right? |
|
will the rethugs fillibuster?
|
blogslut
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 09:22 AM
Response to Reply #21 |
|
The Congress doesn't do filibusters
|
MiniMe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 09:28 AM
Response to Reply #21 |
49. No fillibusters in the House |
VP505
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 09:19 AM
Response to Original message |
|
waste of time??? Sorry to sound cynical but they keep having hearings and nothing changes, Bu$hCo keeps lying, his apologists keep lying, the RePublics keep obstructing and lying and our troops are still dying. I'll try to cowboy up and have some hope that SOMETHING will get done.
|
woodsprite
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 09:19 AM
Response to Original message |
24. Yup - got my coffee. No popcorn, so I had to go with animal crackers. n/t |
L. Coyote
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 09:35 AM
Response to Reply #24 |
78. Now there's an idea. Bush, Cheney, Gonzo, Harriet, et.al. animal crackers! |
|
Difficult to swallow, fun to chew up and spit out! Keep away from children.
|
flyarm
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 09:20 AM
Response to Original message |
25. checking in and ready to rumble!!... |
rodeodance
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 09:20 AM
Response to Original message |
26. "headed toward a showdown"-------count will have to decide says Moderator (cspan) |
jtrockville
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 09:20 AM
Response to Original message |
rodeodance
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 09:24 AM
Response to Reply #27 |
37. -the man of the day--has graveled in. |
rocktivity
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 09:23 AM
Response to Original message |
33. Don't forget that CSPAN has audio streams, too |
|
if you can't watch or video is blocked by your job.
:headbang: rocknation
|
bdamomma
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 09:23 AM
Response to Original message |
35. hey everyone got here just in time!! |
Hepburn
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 09:27 AM
Response to Reply #35 |
MrMickeysMom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 09:29 AM
Response to Reply #35 |
51. Let's get ready (hopefully) to do something! |
bdamomma
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 09:32 AM
Response to Reply #51 |
|
gee, I am surprised I am at work and I can pick up the stream. Woo Hoo!!
|
in_cog_ni_to
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 09:29 AM
Response to Reply #35 |
blogslut
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 09:23 AM
Response to Original message |
36. The horses are on the track |
|
With love from Big Audio Dynamite
|
woodsprite
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 09:24 AM
Response to Reply #36 |
blogslut
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 09:28 AM
Response to Reply #38 |
|
The Bottom Line:
"The horses are on the track" Theres a new dance thats going around When the hits start flying you gotta get down All the young people dance round the square That old time groove is really nowhere So when you reach the bottom line The only thing to do is climb Pick yourself up of the floor Don`t know what you`re waiting for A dance to the tune of economic decline Is when you do the bottom line Nagging questions always remain Why did it happen and who was to blame? When you reach the bottom line The only thing to do is climb Pick yourself up of the floor Don`t know what you`re waiting for The the the the the the horse the the horses are on the track They`ve been doing it down at the zoo And I can show ya heres what to do All of the States and over UK Even the Soviets are swinging away When you reach the bottom line The only thing to do is climb Pick yourself up of the floor Anything you want is yours The road aheads` clear as a motorway Give us this day our daily bread and send us on our way Perchance to dream or take a holiday Romeo oh Romeo You gotta have your say When you reach the bottom line The only thing to do is climb Pick yourself up off the floor Don't know what you're waiting for So when you reach the bottom line The only thing to do is climb Pick yourself up off the floor Anything you want is yours Part two - Part two I`m gonna take you to part two part two
|
malaise
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 09:25 AM
Response to Reply #36 |
40. Resolution being read |
|
without objection says Conyers. Let me begin...recommending that the house cite Miers and Bolton for contempt. Not a step I take easily or lightly....
|
Hepburn
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 09:25 AM
Response to Original message |
41. I got goose bumps just hearing the report being read |
|
by the Clerk when she said about the issue of contempt!
<swoon>
|
rodeodance
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 09:25 AM
Response to Original message |
42. Clerk is reading the Report--REsolution for Contempt . HO HO its has BEGUN |
MrMickeysMom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 09:26 AM
Response to Original message |
43. Conyers had a hard time say, "co-equal branch of govt."! |
helderheid
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 09:29 AM
Response to Original message |
50. "This is a confrontation we have not sought" |
rodeodance
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 09:30 AM
Response to Original message |
53. looking ahead---I have not heard that Conyers will consider going the House |
|
trial route. I keep hearing this will go to DC court which has a Bush appointee as judge.
What have you all heard.???
|
Hissyspit
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 09:30 AM
Response to Original message |
|
The investigation "has uncovered serious evidence of wrongdoing by the department and White House staff," Conyers says.
|
MiniMe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 09:30 AM
Response to Original message |
55. Says that they need to do this to preserve their rights |
|
Because nobody will come to testify if they don't enforce this now.
|
bdamomma
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 09:30 AM
Response to Original message |
56. they will not work with no one Chairman Conyers. |
MrMickeysMom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 09:31 AM
Response to Original message |
57. Mr. Conyers, "congress's rights = people's rights!", sir |
marmar
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 09:33 AM
Response to Reply #57 |
60. How can one state produce so much political trash? (Texas) |
|
Lamar Smith is yet another piece of refuse for the pile.
|
rodeodance
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 09:32 AM
Response to Original message |
59. Smith, R of TX who is the Monority chair. I do not think he is online with Conyers! |
rodeodance
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 09:33 AM
Response to Reply #59 |
67. oh oh-----------the Mantra of "clinton did it" yugga ugggga!!!!! |
rodeodance
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 09:35 AM
Response to Reply #67 |
77. hey he stole our words---Smith saying the Majority is OUT OF TOUCH WITH REALITY!! |
PRETZEL
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 09:35 AM
Response to Reply #59 |
76. That may be an understatement, |
|
He's setting the tone for a very bitter meeting.
He's absoluteley wrong and has already set the tone the "Clinton did it more"
|
tridim
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 09:35 AM
Response to Reply #59 |
81. The Clenis defense, of course.. |
|
:eyes: Just give it a rest Repukes.
|
Hepburn
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 09:33 AM
Response to Original message |
|
...a Repuke from TX....is up and yammering about how bad Clinton was....and not addressing one damn issue. Big surprise...NOT!
|
Solly Mack
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 09:33 AM
Response to Original message |
62. and he really thinks he's making a point (Smith) |
MrMickeysMom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 09:33 AM
Response to Original message |
63. Lamar, blaming Clinton and representing NO ONE from Tx, is no way to |
|
... go through life.
ENOUGH OF THE CLINTON BULLSHIT!
|
mod mom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 09:33 AM
Response to Original message |
64. Lamar Smith compares Bush & Clinton again. No evidence of wrong doing. |
InkAddict
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 09:33 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Would any authoritative body make compromises for any one of us should we just choose not to show up in response to a subpoena?
|
blogslut
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 09:33 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Why don't you mention Nixon or Ronnie or Dubya's daddy?
|
Richard Steele
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 09:34 AM
Response to Original message |
68. Clinton Clinton Clinton Clinton right out of the gate- what a shock! |
helderheid
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 09:34 AM
Response to Original message |
69. Clinton Clinton Clinton Clinton Clinton Clinton. Not to mention Clinton, Clinton, Clinton. |
Richard Steele
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 09:34 AM
Response to Reply #69 |
helderheid
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 09:36 AM
Response to Reply #74 |
Hepburn
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 09:37 AM
Response to Reply #69 |
|
....and assuming they are correct (which they are NOT) that Clinton did something wrong....how EXACTLY does that excuse the wrongs the azzhole has done?
GMAB!
|
helderheid
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 09:37 AM
Response to Reply #91 |
94. EXACTLY. I'll never understand their argument. |
A wise Man
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 09:34 AM
Response to Original message |
|
on the attack of Clinton, rather than justic and the suspension of caging.
|
Subdivisions
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 09:34 AM
Response to Original message |
71. As usual, Clinton did it. |
in_cog_ni_to
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 09:34 AM
Response to Original message |
72. Lamar Smith up making excuses for the psycho. This will be a partisan vote..right down the middle. |
|
Good thing the Dems are the MAJORITY!!!!:rofl::rofl::rofl:
|
bdamomma
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 09:34 AM
Response to Original message |
73. 3 executive orders is that right??? |
|
Edited on Wed Jul-25-07 09:35 AM by alyce douglas
oh, they have to bring up Clinton god, how many times are they going to play this over and over again.
oh, god here goes my blood pressure, what BS, get this guy off.
|
woodsprite
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 09:35 AM
Response to Reply #73 |
83. Maybe, but only because he does everything thru signing statements. n/t |
VP505
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 09:34 AM
Response to Original message |
|
another Clinton bash, that like that's what they are they there for. What a tool!!!
|
MrMickeysMom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 09:35 AM
Response to Original message |
79. Oh, so we should be satisfied with hearing from them NOT UNDER OATH? |
in_cog_ni_to
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 09:38 AM
Response to Reply #79 |
96. OF COURSE! We couldn't possibly have a TRAIL OF THE LIES THEY WOULD TELL! |
flyarm
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 09:35 AM
Response to Original message |
80. HOW MANY TIMES DID NIXON USE EXEC PRIVLEDGE...?? |
|
Edited on Wed Jul-25-07 09:36 AM by flyarm
HOW MANY TIMES DID REAGAN IN IRAN CONTRA??
we dems need to arm ourselves with that info!! at all times
|
MiniMe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 09:35 AM
Response to Original message |
82. WH offered to have Miers and Rove meet and answer their questions |
|
Yeah, they did, with unacceptable terms. No transcript, can't call them back for anything, behind closed doors.
|
bdamomma
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 09:38 AM
Response to Reply #82 |
mod mom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 09:35 AM
Response to Original message |
84. the Pres claim of Exec Priviledge goes back to George Washington. UFB |
blogslut
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 09:35 AM
Response to Original message |
85. All the way back to Washington, Lamar? |
|
When did Nixon change his name to George Washington?
|
in_cog_ni_to
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 09:36 AM
Response to Original message |
87. PATHETIC piece of shit! Clinton. It's ALWAYS about Clinton! |
Sparkly
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 09:36 AM
Response to Original message |
88. Clenis Clenis Clenis Clenis Clenis!!!!! nt |
A wise Man
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 09:37 AM
Response to Original message |
|
like your do nothing congress gave a shit on doing the right thing.
|
MrMickeysMom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 09:37 AM
Response to Original message |
90. What a bunch of shit from Texas. I hope his ass is voted out... |
rodeodance
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 09:37 AM
Response to Original message |
92. Smith is NO gentelman!!!---- |
Drum
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 09:37 AM
Response to Original message |
93. My goodness, Lamar only omitted |
|
the dangers of human/animal hybrids!
What a jackass! x(
|
G_Leo_Criley
(553 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 09:38 AM
Response to Original message |
|
" recommend that they be cited for contempt of congress."
That's right Linda!
:patriot:
|
Wednesdays
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 09:38 AM
Response to Original message |
|
None too soon, what a relief.
|
flyarm
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 09:39 AM
Response to Original message |
99. i just called Lamar's office i asked how many times did Reagan and Nixon use exec privledge?? |
|
PLEASE CALL HIS OFFICE AND ASK THE SAME QUESTIONS..HOW MANY TIMES FOR NIXON AND HOW MANY TIMES FOR REAGAN DURING IRAN CONTRA!
|
in_cog_ni_to
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 09:41 AM
Response to Reply #99 |
106. Did they answer you? :) Let me guess....NO. Am I right? |
Solly Mack
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 09:39 AM
Response to Original message |
100. Lamar Smith is bereft of integrity |
MiniMe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 09:39 AM
Response to Original message |
bdamomma
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 09:39 AM
Response to Original message |
102. Code Pinkers are there. |
rodeodance
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 09:40 AM
Response to Original message |
103. Did all Repugs show up?--are the chairs full? anyone know? |
Hepburn
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 09:41 AM
Response to Original message |
104. Oh, puke.........Cannon the asshole from Utah.... |
|
...is bloviating like a stuck pig. :puke:
|
L. Coyote
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 09:41 AM
Response to Original message |
105. "Administration will direct" DC USA to not prosecute .... HELLO that's impeachable. |
|
I would think. With Sanchez, we are seeing how the Dems have done this correctly.
|
L. Coyote
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 09:42 AM
Response to Reply #105 |
108. *** Official House Judiciary Hearing on Contempt Thread 2 *** |
blogslut
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 09:41 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Cannon is going to whine and rant for a while
|
in_cog_ni_to
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 09:42 AM
Response to Original message |
109. YUK!!!! Cannon.....TOOL. |
Richard Steele
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 09:43 AM
Response to Original message |
110. Chris Cannon says there "isn't much evidence"- HENCE THE SUBPOENAS YOU GODDAMN ASSHOLE!!!!!!! |
|
I'm not gonna make it to the end of this hearing.
|
Hepburn
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 09:44 AM
Response to Original message |
111. So, Rep. Cannon, you dumb asshole....a question for you, OK? |
|
Edited on Wed Jul-25-07 09:45 AM by Hepburn
If the Rethugs in the WH did NOTHING wrong ~~ as you claim ~~ then WHY are they hiding behind a false claim of privilege in order to NOT discuss what went on?
And...so far....we STILL do NOT have the FACTS on how those names of the fired US Attys got on the list. Care to explain WHY that info is being hidden?
Duh.....:eyes:
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 18th 2024, 10:27 AM
Response to Original message |