MiniMe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 10:51 AM
Original message |
*** House Judiciary Comtempt Hearing Thread #5 *** |
|
Edited on Wed Jul-25-07 10:52 AM by MiniMe
|
rocktivity
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 10:51 AM
Response to Original message |
1. Don't forget to link this thread |
|
Edited on Wed Jul-25-07 10:52 AM by rocknation
from thread #4!
|
MiniMe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
Have to create the thread before I link it. :hi:
|
helderheid
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 10:53 AM
Response to Original message |
mikelgb
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 10:53 AM
Response to Original message |
eleny
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 10:54 AM
Response to Original message |
5. Bill Clinton should have insisted on informal, off the record discussions |
|
It's what the Republicans insist is the right thing to do. :evilgrin:
|
Lasher
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
14. And not under oath. And you can't ever ask again. |
marmar
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 10:54 AM
Original message |
Schiff....calling bullshit! |
WinkyDink
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 10:55 AM
Original message |
MORE Democrats need to speak so bluntly and plainly. WTH is the matter with the Milquetoasts? |
Blackhatjack
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 10:54 AM
Response to Original message |
6. Reminds me of the Watergate hearings.... n/t |
redqueen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 10:54 AM
Response to Original message |
7. Just want to say thank you who are watching / reporting. |
|
For keeping the rest of us informed of what's going on.
:hi:
|
sinkingfeeling
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 10:54 AM
Response to Original message |
8. Who is it that's bringing up 'how can you claim EP on things that they also claim never |
MiniMe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 10:55 AM
Response to Original message |
9. Bringing up the conditions of Miers testifying |
|
No transcript, not under oath, etc
|
Gregorian
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 10:55 AM
Response to Original message |
10. Schiff! Executive priviledge for discussions they claim never happened! |
Bluerthanblue
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #10 |
16. yeah, "can't have it both ways"- he WAS good! |
AndyA
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #10 |
22. I like him. That's a very important point. |
|
It can't be both ways. Either conversations happened, and are Executive Privilege, or they did not happen, in which case there is no Executive Privilege.
These Republicans are really too much. What a bunch of crooks. All of them.
|
Hepburn
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #10 |
69. That really makes me wonder.... |
|
...why are they claiming Exec Priv over something they say never happened?
Ummmmm.....??? Huh????
|
LSK
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 10:55 AM
Response to Original message |
11. how many amendments to go? |
in_cog_ni_to
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 10:55 AM
Response to Original message |
12. OMG! Schiff pointed out that Fielding said the testimony of Miers, when NOT under oath, could NOT BE |
|
FOLLOWED UP ON!!! :rofl::rofl: Notice none of the repukes included THAT little FACT in their tirades!
|
Lone_Star_Dem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 10:55 AM
Response to Original message |
13. I'm very sorry for Lamar Smith! |
|
He's a horrible ass. I know, he used to be my rep and we NEVER got along.
|
Old and In the Way
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 10:55 AM
Response to Original message |
15. Democrats are puncturing holes in every Republican talking point. |
Lasher
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #15 |
|
It must feel great to Congressional Democrats to know they have the votes after 12 long years of ruthless suppression.
|
WinkyDink
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 10:56 AM
Response to Original message |
17. Well, we won't KNOW, will we, LAMAR, if the WITNESSES DON'T APPEAR?! |
ljm2002
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 10:56 AM
Response to Original message |
18. The basic argument from the Republics is... |
|
...Gee, we could be doing other stuff.
|
WinkyDink
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #18 |
25. And, gee, if we hold back NOW, we can then go after a FUTURE president (Hillary??). |
|
Edited on Wed Jul-25-07 10:58 AM by WinkyDink
|
TahitiNut
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #18 |
43. I think it's interesting that the SAME 'argument' is used on DU regarding impeachment. |
|
I guess brain damage isn't one-sided. :shrug:
|
hootinholler
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #43 |
137. You're assuming those people are on our side. n/t |
bdamomma
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 10:56 AM
Response to Original message |
19. oh I hate these guys, |
|
and they brought so many words into my vocabulary, such as hate, evil, corrupt, vile, division and so many more.
|
Blackhatjack
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 10:56 AM
Response to Original message |
20. Those who will not defend the Congressional powers bestowed on them are traitors to their oath... |
|
It is unbelievable that they would vote to give away the powers specifically granted Congress in the Constitution.
|
in_cog_ni_to
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #20 |
|
- the entire House of Representatives and one-third of the Senate - must recite an oath:
I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter.
|
marmar
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 10:56 AM
Response to Original message |
21. Going a little ways to court? |
spanone
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 10:57 AM
Response to Original message |
23. blah blah blah blah more amendments and bullsht,,,,,,, |
rodeodance
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 10:58 AM
Response to Original message |
26. I do not think Conyers said the # of amendments. at least I did not hear. |
A wise Man
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 10:58 AM
Response to Original message |
27. The rethugs are totally out on another planet |
WinkyDink
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #27 |
40. I swear, I sincerely DO NOT KNOW how they are able to construct the sentences they do. To me, it's |
|
like they say, "Oh, THAT'S a verb! I'll use THAT!" (Say, "vote".) And then, "Oh, THAT'S a noun! I'll place that IN FRONT of the verb!" (Say, "Kumquats vote.")
Etc.
|
Norquist Nemesis
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #40 |
53. They practice alliteration games to stay fresh |
|
"partisan political ...polluting the political process"
|
NewJeffCT
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #53 |
96. you laugh, but I bet it's been focus-group tested |
|
to play well in a TV sound-bite.
|
Norquist Nemesis
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #96 |
114. No, actually I was serious |
|
I read somewhere that the Cons actually used to have tapes they could play at their leisure on this (thanks to Newt). Once trained, it's second nature to them. All they need are the 10 daily talking points and they take it from there.
|
bdamomma
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 10:58 AM
Response to Original message |
28. the repigs are whining, they do so well don't they. |
Lasher
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 10:58 AM
Response to Original message |
29. What's with these names? |
|
Edited on Wed Jul-25-07 10:59 AM by Lasher
They're so easy to make fun of it almost seems like cheating. Goober up now.
|
spanone
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 10:59 AM
Response to Original message |
30. hey gomer, the amendment is DEAD .....move on and shut up |
spanone
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #30 |
36. How many pardons will bu$h* hand out when HE leaves office |
|
they keep talking up clinton....bullshit
|
WinkyDink
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #36 |
50. If "A" = "Indicted and/or convicted Bushies", and "B" = "Pardons", we've got "A" = "B". |
jojo54
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 10:59 AM
Response to Original message |
|
"bad facts make bad law"?????? Take a look in the mirror before you repukes make a statement like that!!!
WTF????????
|
marmar
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 10:59 AM
Response to Original message |
32. "Don't let the door hit you in the rear butt." |
MrMickeysMom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 10:59 AM
Response to Original message |
33. Had to go away.. is there progress beyond the R's ammendments and BS? |
blogslut
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #33 |
47. Still debating the amendments |
Chichiri
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 10:59 AM
Response to Original message |
34. "Don't let the door hit you in the rear butt?" |
|
and pointless political polluting of the process?
Did someone forget to medicate this guy?
|
global1
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #34 |
44. Tongue Twister - Say That Fast 3 Times ......nt |
Bluerthanblue
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 11:00 AM
Response to Original message |
35. gohmert isn't arguing the ammendment either- |
Mojorabbit
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 11:00 AM
Response to Original message |
|
really afraid they will lose in court? The republicans I mean. Don't go for it unless we lose our power to precedent? So don't bother.
|
slowry
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 11:00 AM
Response to Original message |
38. All alliterations are awful and annoying. n/t |
ROakes1019
(434 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #38 |
|
The frequent use of alliteration is a sign of inherent poetic ability or of schizophrenia.
|
rocktivity
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #38 |
133. At least you seem to know |
|
Edited on Wed Jul-25-07 11:21 AM by rocknation
how alliteration works.:headbang: rcokantion
|
blogslut
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 11:00 AM
Response to Original message |
39. How come these Repubs never bring up Nixon's fight against subpoeanas? |
rodeodance
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 11:00 AM
Response to Original message |
41. Repugs have spent the hearing so fr Belittling this issue. |
rocktivity
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 11:00 AM
Response to Original message |
42. You want TRUTH? You want FACTS? |
|
Miers and Bolton were subpoenaed by Congress, they DIDN'T show. THOSE ARE THE FACTS!!!
|
in_cog_ni_to
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #42 |
55. Please don't confuse their little partisan pea-brains with FACTS! They might explode! Too much info |
Jack Rabbit
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #55 |
118. Their heads might explode? |
|
And we won't have Cannon and Smith to kick around any more?
What would be wrong with that?
|
rodeodance
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #42 |
82. they are NOT interested in facts. |
bobthedrummer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 11:01 AM
Response to Original message |
46. Impeach Cheney first. |
bdamomma
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 11:01 AM
Response to Original message |
48. yea, maxine waters!!!! |
MrMickeysMom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 11:02 AM
Response to Original message |
49. Maxine.. do your thing... |
AndyA
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 11:02 AM
Response to Original message |
51. Maxine is going to tell them all about it. |
|
Go Maxine! Smack the liars and obstructors down!
|
Chichiri
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 11:02 AM
Response to Original message |
52. LOL Good one, Conyers! |
|
"I think those words, 'partisan political polluting of the process' will be historically the most remembered words from this debate." LOL!!!
|
Lasher
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #52 |
57. Boy, did he ever fling that slogan back at them! |
|
I just love Conyers' style! He is one of a kind.
|
Jack Rabbit
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #52 |
124. Sounds like someone channeled Spiro Agnew |
WinkyDink
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 11:03 AM
Response to Original message |
54. It always takes a tough broad.....IMHO!! |
in_cog_ni_to
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #54 |
61. I love her! She NEVER takes the crap they dish out. |
mod mom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 11:03 AM
Response to Original message |
56. I LOVE MAXINE WATERS!!!! |
tandot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #56 |
|
I can't watch it from work. Thanks. :hi:
|
bobthedrummer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 11:04 AM
Response to Original message |
L. Coyote
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 11:04 AM
Response to Original message |
59. Rep. Maxine Water: They asked for this lecture. Thank you Madam! |
PA Democrat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 11:04 AM
Response to Original message |
60. What convoluted logic these Republicans put forth. |
|
We should let Bush administration officials thumb their noses at the Congress when subpoenaed because otherwise we set a bad precedent. I am dizzy trying to follow their twisted rationale. Somehow, they are claiming that allowing Bush to withhold information will prevent future administrations from abuse of power. WTF?
|
Chichiri
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 11:04 AM
Response to Original message |
63. Heh -- NY-8, Manhattan and Brooklyn, so you know . . . |
|
. . . THIS guy ain't gonna bullshit anyone.
|
blogslut
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 11:04 AM
Response to Original message |
64. Nadler naming all the crimes of Bushco |
Webster Green
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 11:04 AM
Response to Original message |
65. These pukes are fine with the destruction of the Justice Department? |
|
Edited on Wed Jul-25-07 11:06 AM by Webster Green
Unbelievable!
They are all fucking traitors to the republic, as far as I'm concerned.
They claim that the congressional investigation is politically motivated, but can't see that the Justice Dept. was changed into an arm of the Republican campaign committee.
(edit for mispelling)
|
TahitiNut
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 11:04 AM
Response to Original message |
66. Me loves me some Jerry Nadler! |
mod mom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 11:04 AM
Response to Original message |
67. Nadler : This committe not only about crime but also protecting the constitution! |
L. Coyote
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 11:05 AM
Response to Original message |
68. "They have sent the Attorney General here to lie." |
|
Edited on Wed Jul-25-07 11:05 AM by L. Coyote
Yes, call criminals criminals. Thank you.
|
in_cog_ni_to
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 11:05 AM
Response to Original message |
70. GO SHELIA!!!! Give 'em hell! |
OmmmSweetOmmm
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 11:05 AM
Response to Original message |
71. Sheila brings up Nixon!!!!! eom |
|
Edited on Wed Jul-25-07 11:06 AM by OmmmSweetOmmm
|
Lasher
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 11:05 AM
Response to Original message |
72. Lee brought up Nixon! |
blogslut
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 11:05 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Revives the ghost of NIXON! Yeehaw!
|
Chichiri
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 11:05 AM
Response to Original message |
74. Woo hoo, Jackson-Lee! |
|
"I'm prepared to accept a clash of constitutional powers, because the constitution is superior to the feelings of the people in this room."
|
Hepburn
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #74 |
78. She is sooooooooooooo RIGHT ON!!!!! |
|
Go, Sheila, go!!!! :applause:
Kicking butt and taking names!!!!!!!!
|
bdamomma
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 11:05 AM
Response to Original message |
75. ohhh baby sheila jackson lee, is hitting back!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
|
Edited on Wed Jul-25-07 11:10 AM by alyce douglas
:woohoo:
sensenbrenner what a POS he is. miserable man.
|
spanone
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 11:06 AM
Response to Original message |
76. Sheila Jackson Lee......Kick Ass..... |
MrMickeysMom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 11:06 AM
Response to Original message |
77. Re-establish the Constitutional powers, Goddamn right! |
WinkyDink
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 11:06 AM
Response to Original message |
79. If Bush wants to be monarchial, I nominate the "Louis XVI" model. |
Drum
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 11:07 AM
Response to Original message |
80. "Time we look at the gorilla in the room: Nixon." |
|
and "The feelings of the members in this room are not as important as the needs of the American People"
Right on!!!
|
L. Coyote
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #80 |
98. Finally, the American People get a mention. The People v. Bush/Cheney |
|
is the state of the nation. The rights of the people have been violated. The government of the People is what is at stake today.
|
Chichiri
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 11:07 AM
Response to Original message |
81. Holy god, for the first time in my life, I wish I lived in Texas. |
|
TX-18, to be precise -- just so I can have Sheila as my rep.
|
Chichiri
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #81 |
84. LOL!! "Mr. Chairman?" " . . . who is this?" |
Lasher
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #84 |
86. Ha ha, Conyers is doing his best to keep things moving. |
LSK
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 11:07 AM
Response to Original message |
83. how could anyone watch this and not love John Conyers? |
|
Edited on Wed Jul-25-07 11:10 AM by LSK
Edit: Ooops, typo
|
Lasher
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #83 |
92. I'm going to guess that Lord Vader isn't feeling much affection for Conyers right now. |
OmmmSweetOmmm
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #83 |
93. He stepped on what they were saying. eom |
blogslut
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 11:08 AM
Response to Original message |
Blackhatjack
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 11:09 AM
Response to Original message |
87. So how many Repub amendments have been voted down so far? n/t |
Lasher
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #87 |
95. Two since I've been on board but I wasn't here at the start. |
Drum
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #95 |
99. I think it's two in total (so far) nt |
L. Coyote
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 11:09 AM
Response to Original message |
88. The amendment isn't the only thing not relevant today! Impeach NOW! |
Hepburn
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #88 |
102. Great pic....it is my desktop wallpaper today! n/t |
L. Coyote
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #102 |
138. Good idea. I've added a 1280 x 800 pixel deskpicture |
rodeodance
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 11:09 AM
Response to Original message |
89. gee, I already Ruled it NOT Germaine!! --they could have saved time! |
Chichiri
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 11:09 AM
Response to Original message |
90. Mister Guitterez . . . is invisible? O_o |
|
Sorry, I'm actually having some fun with this hearing. :)
|
spanone
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 11:10 AM
Response to Original message |
91. every amendment is a brownie point with mr cheney.....traitors |
|
Edited on Wed Jul-25-07 11:15 AM by spanone
|
rodeodance
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 11:11 AM
Response to Original message |
94. 22-16-Repug Amendment Failed |
LSK
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #94 |
105. I like that vote total, I think the contempt charges will pass |
NewJeffCT
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #94 |
108. is 22-16 the committee split by party? I thought it was 20-18? |
bdamomma
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 11:11 AM
Response to Original message |
97. conyers is all business and cool as a cucumber huh? |
Lasher
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #97 |
104. That's right alyce. He's focused on getting the contempt measure passed. |
PA Democrat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 11:12 AM
Response to Original message |
100. FYI. Judiciary Committee has 23 Democratic members and 17 Republican members |
in_cog_ni_to
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #100 |
119. Are they now finished with the Contempt issue? |
PA Democrat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #119 |
|
Edited on Wed Jul-25-07 11:21 AM by PA Democrat
Was that vote to send the contempt charges to the floor for a vote?
|
rodeodance
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 11:12 AM
Response to Original message |
101. yahoo-------Finally after all the Repug Obstruction tactics they are getting to the VOTE. |
in_cog_ni_to
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 11:12 AM
Response to Original message |
LSK
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #103 |
110. I saw him on a previous vote |
|
Maybe hes involved in another hearing or House floor business?
|
Blackhatjack
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 11:13 AM
Response to Original message |
106. This must be crushing for those who thought they were part of a "Permanent Repub Majority" |
bobthedrummer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 11:14 AM
Response to Original message |
107. Impeach Cheney first |
bdamomma
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 11:14 AM
Response to Original message |
111. boy, those repigs stick together don't they, they will go down |
Chichiri
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 11:14 AM
Response to Original message |
112. This is the very definition of angry white men. |
|
On the right side of the room.
|
sinkingfeeling
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 11:14 AM
Response to Original message |
MiniMe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 11:15 AM
Response to Original message |
115. Amazing that not 1 repuke is voting for the bill |
|
Talk about party over country
|
rodeodance
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 11:15 AM
Response to Original message |
116. The resolution is 22 AYE and 17 NAYs ---the REport is AGREED to!!! |
Lasher
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 11:15 AM
Response to Original message |
|
The contempt measure is passed. Yay!
|
SharonRB
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #117 |
120. Will it go to the full House today? |
IChing
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #120 |
121. He saiid 2 days are given to add comments |
Lasher
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #121 |
126. I guess Wexler didn't vote. |
|
22 to 17 was the total but there are 23 Democrats.
|
bdamomma
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #121 |
127. oh well guys that's it, the amendment will go to the HOuse. |
|
have a good day you guys.
|
Chichiri
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #120 |
125. I don't know, but I'm thinking Friday. |
|
Conyers said that committee members have two days to submit something or other. That could just be a follow up. I really don't know.
|
Lasher
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #125 |
134. I hope it doesn't go the House until Monday then. |
|
Kinda like a reverse Friday news dump.
|
blogslut
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 11:17 AM
Response to Original message |
122. Damned Cats shut off my DSL!!! |
|
I missed the damned end of it, didn't I?
|
IChing
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #122 |
129. you are lucky Laura Bush appeared on my feed |
cboy4
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #129 |
132. She's talking about school books for African children and the first |
|
thing out of her mouth is "September 11th."
terra terra!!! :eyes:
|
Lasher
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #132 |
135. Git out there and spread the fear, Laura |
|
It's kinda sad, the only thing this administration they can cite in their favor is their failure to protect our nation form the worst terrorist attack ever, despite clear warnings it was coming.
|
Lasher
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #122 |
130. Hahahahaha, mine like to walk on the keyboard. |
|
That's my excuse for some of the things I've posted here.
|
MiniMe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #122 |
quiet.american
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 11:18 AM
Response to Original message |
128. Thank you, Chairman Conyers! n/t |
Jack Rabbit
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-25-07 11:28 AM
Response to Original message |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:00 AM
Response to Original message |