Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

*** House Judiciary Comtempt Hearing Thread #5 ***

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 10:51 AM
Original message
*** House Judiciary Comtempt Hearing Thread #5 ***
Edited on Wed Jul-25-07 10:52 AM by MiniMe
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
1. Don't forget to link this thread
Edited on Wed Jul-25-07 10:52 AM by rocknation
from thread #4!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Just did. Thanks
Have to create the thread before I link it. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
3. KICKING ASS!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mikelgb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
4. checking in
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
5. Bill Clinton should have insisted on informal, off the record discussions
It's what the Republicans insist is the right thing to do. :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #5
14. And not under oath. And you can't ever ask again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 10:54 AM
Original message
Schiff....calling bullshit!
:headbang:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 10:55 AM
Original message
MORE Democrats need to speak so bluntly and plainly. WTH is the matter with the Milquetoasts?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blackhatjack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
6. Reminds me of the Watergate hearings.... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
7. Just want to say thank you who are watching / reporting.
For keeping the rest of us informed of what's going on.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
8. Who is it that's bringing up 'how can you claim EP on things that they also claim never
took place?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
9. Bringing up the conditions of Miers testifying
No transcript, not under oath, etc
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gregorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
10. Schiff! Executive priviledge for discussions they claim never happened!
He's on fire!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluerthanblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #10
16. yeah, "can't have it both ways"- he WAS good!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #10
22. I like him. That's a very important point.
It can't be both ways. Either conversations happened, and are Executive Privilege, or they did not happen, in which case there is no Executive Privilege.

These Republicans are really too much. What a bunch of crooks. All of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #10
69. That really makes me wonder....
...why are they claiming Exec Priv over something they say never happened?

Ummmmm.....??? Huh????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
11. how many amendments to go?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
12. OMG! Schiff pointed out that Fielding said the testimony of Miers, when NOT under oath, could NOT BE
FOLLOWED UP ON!!! :rofl::rofl: Notice none of the repukes included THAT little FACT in their tirades!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
13. I'm very sorry for Lamar Smith!
He's a horrible ass. I know, he used to be my rep and we NEVER got along.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
15. Democrats are puncturing holes in every Republican talking point.
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #15
24. Yes they are.
It must feel great to Congressional Democrats to know they have the votes after 12 long years of ruthless suppression.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
17. Well, we won't KNOW, will we, LAMAR, if the WITNESSES DON'T APPEAR?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ljm2002 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
18. The basic argument from the Republics is...
...Gee, we could be doing other stuff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #18
25. And, gee, if we hold back NOW, we can then go after a FUTURE president (Hillary??).
Edited on Wed Jul-25-07 10:58 AM by WinkyDink
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #18
43. I think it's interesting that the SAME 'argument' is used on DU regarding impeachment.
I guess brain damage isn't one-sided. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #43
137. You're assuming those people are on our side. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
19. oh I hate these guys,
and they brought so many words into my vocabulary, such as hate, evil, corrupt, vile, division and so many more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blackhatjack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
20. Those who will not defend the Congressional powers bestowed on them are traitors to their oath...
It is unbelievable that they would vote to give away the powers specifically granted Congress in the Constitution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #20
45. Their OATH:
- the entire House of Representatives and one-third of the Senate - must recite an oath:

I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
21. Going a little ways to court?
WTF does that mean?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
23. blah blah blah blah more amendments and bullsht,,,,,,,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
26. I do not think Conyers said the # of amendments. at least I did not hear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
A wise Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
27. The rethugs are totally out on another planet
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #27
40. I swear, I sincerely DO NOT KNOW how they are able to construct the sentences they do. To me, it's
like they say, "Oh, THAT'S a verb! I'll use THAT!" (Say, "vote".) And then, "Oh, THAT'S a noun! I'll place that IN FRONT of the verb!" (Say, "Kumquats vote.")

Etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #40
53. They practice alliteration games to stay fresh
"partisan political ...polluting the political process"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #53
96. you laugh, but I bet it's been focus-group tested
to play well in a TV sound-bite.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #96
114. No, actually I was serious
I read somewhere that the Cons actually used to have tapes they could play at their leisure on this (thanks to Newt). Once trained, it's second nature to them. All they need are the 10 daily talking points and they take it from there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
28. the repigs are whining, they do so well don't they.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
29. What's with these names?
Edited on Wed Jul-25-07 10:59 AM by Lasher
They're so easy to make fun of it almost seems like cheating. Goober up now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
30. hey gomer, the amendment is DEAD .....move on and shut up
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #30
36. How many pardons will bu$h* hand out when HE leaves office
they keep talking up clinton....bullshit
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #36
50. If "A" = "Indicted and/or convicted Bushies", and "B" = "Pardons", we've got "A" = "B".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jojo54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
31. Gohmert..
"bad facts make bad law"?????? Take a look in the mirror before you repukes make a statement like that!!!

WTF????????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
32. "Don't let the door hit you in the rear butt."
Gohmert, or Gomer?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrMickeysMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
33. Had to go away.. is there progress beyond the R's ammendments and BS?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #33
47. Still debating the amendments
Maxine Waters up!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chichiri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
34. "Don't let the door hit you in the rear butt?"
and pointless political polluting of the process?

Did someone forget to medicate this guy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
global1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #34
44. Tongue Twister - Say That Fast 3 Times ......nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluerthanblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
35. gohmert isn't arguing the ammendment either-
what a blow hard
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojorabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
37. Are they
really afraid they will lose in court? The republicans I mean. Don't go for it unless we lose our power to precedent? So don't bother.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slowry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
38. All alliterations are awful and annoying. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ROakes1019 Donating Member (434 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #38
109. alliteration
The frequent use of alliteration is a sign of inherent poetic ability or of schizophrenia.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #38
133. At least you seem to know
Edited on Wed Jul-25-07 11:21 AM by rocknation
how alliteration works.

:headbang:
rcokantion
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
39. How come these Repubs never bring up Nixon's fight against subpoeanas?
HUH?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
41. Repugs have spent the hearing so fr Belittling this issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
42. You want TRUTH? You want FACTS?
Miers and Bolton were subpoenaed by Congress, they DIDN'T show. THOSE ARE THE FACTS!!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #42
55.  Please don't confuse their little partisan pea-brains with FACTS! They might explode! Too much info
for them!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #55
118. Their heads might explode?
And we won't have Cannon and Smith to kick around any more?

What would be wrong with that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #42
82. they are NOT interested in facts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
46. Impeach Cheney first.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
48. yea, maxine waters!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrMickeysMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
49. Maxine.. do your thing...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
51. Maxine is going to tell them all about it.
Go Maxine! Smack the liars and obstructors down!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chichiri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
52. LOL Good one, Conyers!
"I think those words, 'partisan political polluting of the process' will be historically the most remembered words from this debate." LOL!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #52
57. Boy, did he ever fling that slogan back at them!
I just love Conyers' style! He is one of a kind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #52
124. Sounds like someone channeled Spiro Agnew
!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
54. It always takes a tough broad.....IMHO!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #54
61. I love her! She NEVER takes the crap they dish out.
:loveya:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
56. I LOVE MAXINE WATERS!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tandot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #56
62. What did she say?
I can't watch it from work. Thanks. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
58. The truth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
59. Rep. Maxine Water: They asked for this lecture. Thank you Madam!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PA Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
60. What convoluted logic these Republicans put forth.
We should let Bush administration officials thumb their noses at the Congress when subpoenaed because otherwise we set a bad precedent. I am dizzy trying to follow their twisted rationale. Somehow, they are claiming that allowing Bush to withhold information will prevent future administrations from abuse of power. WTF?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chichiri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
63. Heh -- NY-8, Manhattan and Brooklyn, so you know . . .
. . . THIS guy ain't gonna bullshit anyone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
64. Nadler naming all the crimes of Bushco
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Webster Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
65. These pukes are fine with the destruction of the Justice Department?
Edited on Wed Jul-25-07 11:06 AM by Webster Green
Unbelievable!

They are all fucking traitors to the republic, as far as I'm concerned.

They claim that the congressional investigation is politically motivated, but can't see that the Justice Dept. was changed into an arm of the Republican campaign committee.


(edit for mispelling)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
66. Me loves me some Jerry Nadler!
He says it like it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
67. Nadler : This committe not only about crime but also protecting the constitution!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
68. "They have sent the Attorney General here to lie."
Edited on Wed Jul-25-07 11:05 AM by L. Coyote
Yes, call criminals criminals. Thank you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
70. GO SHELIA!!!! Give 'em hell!
:loveya:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
71. Sheila brings up Nixon!!!!! eom
Edited on Wed Jul-25-07 11:06 AM by OmmmSweetOmmm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
72. Lee brought up Nixon!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
73. Sheila Jackson-Lee
Revives the ghost of NIXON! Yeehaw!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chichiri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
74. Woo hoo, Jackson-Lee!
"I'm prepared to accept a clash of constitutional powers, because the constitution is superior to the feelings of the people in this room."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #74
78. She is sooooooooooooo RIGHT ON!!!!!
Go, Sheila, go!!!! :applause:

Kicking butt and taking names!!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
75. ohhh baby sheila jackson lee, is hitting back!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Edited on Wed Jul-25-07 11:10 AM by alyce douglas
:woohoo:


sensenbrenner what a POS he is. miserable man.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
76. Sheila Jackson Lee......Kick Ass.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrMickeysMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
77. Re-establish the Constitutional powers, Goddamn right!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
79. If Bush wants to be monarchial, I nominate the "Louis XVI" model.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
80. "Time we look at the gorilla in the room: Nixon."
and "The feelings of the members in this room are not as important as the needs of the American People"

Right on!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #80
98. Finally, the American People get a mention. The People v. Bush/Cheney
is the state of the nation. The rights of the people have been violated. The government of the People is what is at stake today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chichiri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
81. Holy god, for the first time in my life, I wish I lived in Texas.
TX-18, to be precise -- just so I can have Sheila as my rep.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chichiri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #81
84. LOL!! "Mr. Chairman?" " . . . who is this?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #84
86. Ha ha, Conyers is doing his best to keep things moving.
Eyes on the prize.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
83. how could anyone watch this and not love John Conyers?
Edited on Wed Jul-25-07 11:10 AM by LSK
Edit: Ooops, typo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #83
92. I'm going to guess that Lord Vader isn't feeling much affection for Conyers right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #83
93. He stepped on what they were saying. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
85. Watt calls it
Diversion = Repubs
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blackhatjack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
87. So how many Repub amendments have been voted down so far? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #87
95. Two since I've been on board but I wasn't here at the start.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #95
99. I think it's two in total (so far) nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
88. The amendment isn't the only thing not relevant today! Impeach NOW!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #88
102. Great pic....it is my desktop wallpaper today! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #102
138. Good idea. I've added a 1280 x 800 pixel deskpicture
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
89. gee, I already Ruled it NOT Germaine!! --they could have saved time!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chichiri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
90. Mister Guitterez . . . is invisible? O_o
Sorry, I'm actually having some fun with this hearing. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
91. every amendment is a brownie point with mr cheney.....traitors
Edited on Wed Jul-25-07 11:15 AM by spanone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
94. 22-16-Repug Amendment Failed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #94
105. I like that vote total, I think the contempt charges will pass
IF we ever get to them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #94
108. is 22-16 the committee split by party? I thought it was 20-18?
but, I could be wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
97. conyers is all business and cool as a cucumber huh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #97
104. That's right alyce. He's focused on getting the contempt measure passed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PA Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
100. FYI. Judiciary Committee has 23 Democratic members and 17 Republican members
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #100
119. Are they now finished with the Contempt issue?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PA Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #119
123. Did I miss it?
Edited on Wed Jul-25-07 11:21 AM by PA Democrat
Was that vote to send the contempt charges to the floor for a vote?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
101. yahoo-------Finally after all the Repug Obstruction tactics they are getting to the VOTE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
103. Where's Wexler???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #103
110. I saw him on a previous vote
Maybe hes involved in another hearing or House floor business?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blackhatjack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
106. This must be crushing for those who thought they were part of a "Permanent Repub Majority"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
107. Impeach Cheney first
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
111. boy, those repigs stick together don't they, they will go down
with the ship.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chichiri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
112. This is the very definition of angry white men.
On the right side of the room.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
113. Report accepted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
115. Amazing that not 1 repuke is voting for the bill
Talk about party over country
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
116. The resolution is 22 AYE and 17 NAYs ---the REport is AGREED to!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
117. 22 Aye and 17 nay
The contempt measure is passed. Yay!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SharonRB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #117
120. Will it go to the full House today?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IChing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #120
121. He saiid 2 days are given to add comments
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #121
126. I guess Wexler didn't vote.
22 to 17 was the total but there are 23 Democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #121
127. oh well guys that's it, the amendment will go to the HOuse.
have a good day you guys.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chichiri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #120
125. I don't know, but I'm thinking Friday.
Conyers said that committee members have two days to submit something or other. That could just be a follow up. I really don't know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #125
134. I hope it doesn't go the House until Monday then.
Kinda like a reverse Friday news dump.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
122. Damned Cats shut off my DSL!!!
I missed the damned end of it, didn't I?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IChing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #122
129. you are lucky Laura Bush appeared on my feed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cboy4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #129
132. She's talking about school books for African children and the first
thing out of her mouth is "September 11th."

terra terra!!! :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #132
135. Git out there and spread the fear, Laura
It's kinda sad, the only thing this administration they can cite in their favor is their failure to protect our nation form the worst terrorist attack ever, despite clear warnings it was coming.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #122
130. Hahahahaha, mine like to walk on the keyboard.
That's my excuse for some of the things I've posted here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #122
131. Yup
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quiet.american Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 11:18 AM
Response to Original message
128. Thank you, Chairman Conyers! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
136. Thank you, MiniMe
!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:00 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC