http://www.townhall.com/columnists/RobertDNovak/2003/02/10/the_american_imperium"This imperial mission has staunch proponents inside the Bush administration, definitely not including Secretary of State Powell. Worried Republicans in Congress and outside government question U.S. capability to bear so heavy a burden. The nation-building exercise in Afghanistan is faltering, and the task of dealing with North Korea while mobilizing against Iraq strains the government's capacity. ... In quest of national greatness at home and of a Middle East that is safe for America and Israel, George W. Bush faces a daunting task. While disdaining nation building, he is embarking on empire building." The tone is not rah-rah.
http://www.townhall.com/columnists/RobertDNovak/2003/03/06/playing_texas_poker'"This is Texas Poker, with the president putting everything on Iraq," a Republican senator (who thoroughly approves of this policy) told me. The extraordinary gamble by President Bush leads to deepening apprehension by Republican politicians as they wait for the inevitable war. They consider the Democratic Party divided, drifting to the left and devoid of new ideas. Yet, Bush's re-election next year is threatened by two issues: the economy and the war on terrorism. Success on both is tied to war with Iraq.' Again, not rah-rah. Worried for his party.
http://www.townhall.com/columnists/RobertDNovak/2003/03/17/cheneys_war_talkNearly a month after that admonition, the vice president is suggesting privately that going to war with Iraq is essentially a U.S. venture with the quest for U.N. sanctioning merely a means of securing Britain as a junior military partner. That reflects Bush administration officials who argue that the United States, as the last surviving superpower, must act on its own to shape the world. Colin Powell has fought that mindset, but his statement Thursday about removing Saddam Hussein without U.N. authorization was an implicit admission that Cheney is in the driver's seat.
http://www.townhall.com/columnists/RobertDNovak/2003/03/20/breaking_up_iraq(worries about Turkish/Iranian aspirations)
http://www.townhall.com/columnists/RobertDNovak/2003/03/27/no_cakewalk"There were some who were supportive of going to war with Iraq who described it as a cakewalk," Tim Russert told Donald Rumsfeld on NBC's "Meet the Press" last Sunday. The secretary of Defense seemed surprised. "I never did," he replied. "No one I know in the Pentagon ever did." While Rumsfeld spoke the literal truth, his response was still disingenuous. ... Yet, civilian and military sources high in the government now believe coalition forces, short on manpower, must rely on air power to win the battle of Baghdad. Clearly, it is no cakewalk.
It's one thing to be against having gone into Iraq--Novak certainly falls in that group, he's no neo-con (the word for him is paleo-con). But the question of going in or not is one matter, that of what to do once there is another. There he's more like *.