Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

On CNN, just now, Novak basically said that Iraq needed a dictator.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Fridays Child Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 04:37 PM
Original message
On CNN, just now, Novak basically said that Iraq needed a dictator.
Edited on Wed Jul-25-07 05:10 PM by Fridays Child
He was listing his reason for having been against the war from the beginning. He said he was sure that there were no WMDs and he believed that Iraq could be governed only by a dictator like Saddam.

ETA: He's peddling a book he just wrote. It's titled, The Prince of Darkness but I'm not sure why. I lost my TV signal, right after his comment about Saddam. It's stormy here.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
OnceUponTimeOnTheNet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 04:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. Novak was against the war from the beginning?
Where is that WTF icon.... here it is! :wtf: But I think this silly one is more apt, :silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fridays Child Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. So he says.
I have a hard time with that one, too. Maybe he means that, off the record, he was against it. But that would show him for the world class whore that he is, wouldn't it? Besides, for being, anti-war, he sure has carried a hell of a lot of Bush administration water on the issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #6
21. Try this column.
http://www.townhall.com/columnists/RobertDNovak/2003/02/10/the_american_imperium
"This imperial mission has staunch proponents inside the Bush administration, definitely not including Secretary of State Powell. Worried Republicans in Congress and outside government question U.S. capability to bear so heavy a burden. The nation-building exercise in Afghanistan is faltering, and the task of dealing with North Korea while mobilizing against Iraq strains the government's capacity. ... In quest of national greatness at home and of a Middle East that is safe for America and Israel, George W. Bush faces a daunting task. While disdaining nation building, he is embarking on empire building." The tone is not rah-rah.

http://www.townhall.com/columnists/RobertDNovak/2003/03/06/playing_texas_poker
'"This is Texas Poker, with the president putting everything on Iraq," a Republican senator (who thoroughly approves of this policy) told me. The extraordinary gamble by President Bush leads to deepening apprehension by Republican politicians as they wait for the inevitable war. They consider the Democratic Party divided, drifting to the left and devoid of new ideas. Yet, Bush's re-election next year is threatened by two issues: the economy and the war on terrorism. Success on both is tied to war with Iraq.' Again, not rah-rah. Worried for his party.

http://www.townhall.com/columnists/RobertDNovak/2003/03/17/cheneys_war_talk
Nearly a month after that admonition, the vice president is suggesting privately that going to war with Iraq is essentially a U.S. venture with the quest for U.N. sanctioning merely a means of securing Britain as a junior military partner. That reflects Bush administration officials who argue that the United States, as the last surviving superpower, must act on its own to shape the world. Colin Powell has fought that mindset, but his statement Thursday about removing Saddam Hussein without U.N. authorization was an implicit admission that Cheney is in the driver's seat.

http://www.townhall.com/columnists/RobertDNovak/2003/03/20/breaking_up_iraq
(worries about Turkish/Iranian aspirations)

http://www.townhall.com/columnists/RobertDNovak/2003/03/27/no_cakewalk
"There were some who were supportive of going to war with Iraq who described it as a cakewalk," Tim Russert told Donald Rumsfeld on NBC's "Meet the Press" last Sunday. The secretary of Defense seemed surprised. "I never did," he replied. "No one I know in the Pentagon ever did." While Rumsfeld spoke the literal truth, his response was still disingenuous. ... Yet, civilian and military sources high in the government now believe coalition forces, short on manpower, must rely on air power to win the battle of Baghdad. Clearly, it is no cakewalk.



It's one thing to be against having gone into Iraq--Novak certainly falls in that group, he's no neo-con (the word for him is paleo-con). But the question of going in or not is one matter, that of what to do once there is another. There he's more like *.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unpossibles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 04:43 PM
Response to Original message
2. he then said, "hey, it works for America." n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
3. Funny, I could have sworn we just hanged their dictator.
The Douchebag of Liberty should climb back under his rock.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PA Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
4. "Operation Iraqi New Dictator" ?
Not a very catchy slogan for a war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fridays Child Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 05:02 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. But an honest one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkofos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 05:06 PM
Response to Original message
7. That might be the only truthful thing that douch-bag has ever said!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fridays Child Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. And Wolfie ignored it completely.
Nary a peep. Not even a "huh." Nothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkofos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #8
15. I sometimes think wolfie only listens to himself during an interview.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OnceUponTimeOnTheNet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. Wolfie does love the sound of his voice.
I'm still pissed over the coverage he did on the naming of a new Pope. Talked himself Stoopid during the ringing of those bells. Never did hear the bells, just wolfies overbearing idiot voice.
dipshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fridays Child Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. I'm willing to bet that his voice was the model for Officer Barbrady's, on South Park.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #8
16. Leslie does not get paid to confront NeoCons
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 05:10 PM
Response to Original message
9. Repubicans think EVERYONE needs a dictator.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fridays Child Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. And, from time to time, the truth accidentally escapes from their fetid mouths.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Proof that the truth will not be held down indefinitely? I think so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 05:13 PM
Response to Original message
12. Totally Off Topic, But Ya Just Reminded Me Of Something.
I saw a non-political bumpersticker on a car in the parking lot at work, as I was leaving for the day. It said "Medical Transcriptionists work for Dictators".

Don't know why, but I found it incredibly witty and amusing. Just wanted to share for no reason whatsoever LOL

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 05:14 PM
Response to Original message
13. LOL!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
partylessinOhio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 05:15 PM
Response to Original message
14. That ugly little dwarf has gone insane! He is a liar.
He is/was all entangled with Bush and Company.

Saddam was a better man than Novak could ever be. We had no right to invade that country and kill their President. But Novak does not deserve to make light of the invasion and hideous war we continue to conduct.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MODemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
19. Bush or Cheney should apply for the job of Dictator of Iraq
They're trying to change our government to a Dictatorship, and they are coming along pretty
well with it.They do whatever they please, and whenever they wish to do it.It seems we're too busy stabbingeach other in the back to worry about them.
;( :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fridays Child Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 07:08 PM
Response to Original message
20. On re-run, I caught his comments verbatim...
I didn't have my own intelligence agency but just talking to the inspectors and people who had been on the spot, I was SURE, I was positive, he didn't have any weapons of mass destruction. And I also knew, from my reporting, that this was, these were people who were very difficult and it'd be very difficult to govern that country without a dictator like Saddam Hussein.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:12 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC