Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Army Study: Guantanamo Detainees Pose Direct Terrorist Threat

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 06:08 PM
Original message
Army Study: Guantanamo Detainees Pose Direct Terrorist Threat
I wonder if these include the ones being force-fed intravenously?

Study Paints a Threatening Portrait of Detainees


By WILLIAM GLABERSON
Published: July 25, 2007

WASHINGTON, July 25 — Accelerating the public relations battle over Guantánamo, a new study requested by the Pentagon argues that large numbers of detainees were a direct threat to United States forces, including al Qaeda fighters, terrorism-training camp veterans and men who had experience with explosives, sniper rifles and rocket-propelled grenades.

The report, by a terrorism study center at West Point, is essentially a rebuttal by the military of growing assertions by advocates for detainees that the naval station at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, is filled with hapless innocents and low-level cooks and other support personnel who pose no real threat.

It paints a chilling portrait of the Guantánamo detainees. Publicly available information, the report says, indicates that 73 percent of them were a “demonstrated threat” to American or coalition forces. It says that 95 percent were at the least a “potential threat,” including detainees who had played a supporting role in terrorist groups or had expressed a commitment to pursuing jihadist violence.

The authors make clear that one of the report’s purposes is to affect public attitudes. The report says its conclusions should “enhance our collective understanding of the threats facing the United States, its allies and its interests and how we respond to them.”

more...

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/25/washington/25cnd-gitmo.html?_r=2&ref=washington&oref=slogin&oref=slogin

**********************************

http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2007/07/22/2685/

US Force-Feeds Guantanamo Hunger Strikers
by Ben Fox

GUANTANAMO BAY NAVAL BASE, Cuba - Twice a day at the U.S. military prison, Abdul Rahman Shalabi and Zaid Salim Zuhair Ahmed are strapped down in padded restraint chairs, and flexible yellow tubes are inserted through their noses and throats. Milky nutritional supplements, mixed with water and olive oil to add calories and ease constipation, pour into their stomachs.

Shalabi, 32, an accused al-Qaida militant who was among the first prisoners taken to Guantanamo, and Ahmed, about 34, have refused to eat for almost two years to protest their conditions and open-ended confinement. In recent months, the number of hunger strikers has grown to two dozen, and the military is using force-feeding to keep them from starving.

An Associated Press investigation reveals the most complete picture yet of a test of wills that’s taking place out of public view and shows no sign of ending, despite international outrage.

more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 06:10 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yeah, I imagine they probably fucking do by now
If someone had taken me and locked me up without a trial for 5 years I'd become one too. I'd make it my life's mission to make sure someone suffered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 06:11 PM
Response to Original message
2. Did they let them go? Give them firearms and plane tickets???
AAAAAAAAAHHHHHHH!!!! BE AFRAID!!!!!!!!!! RUN!!!!!!!!!!!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cynatnite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
3. Since we know next to nothing about them...
or what they're accused of, have no idea what the evidence is, and there hasn't been a legitimate trial...hard to take anyone's word about these men.

Oh, and that's not to mention all the innocent ones the US has sent there including a fifteen year old boy who was tortured.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 06:13 PM
Response to Original message
4. You know, what these brainiacs seem to not "get" is
Edited on Wed Jul-25-07 06:13 PM by Solly Mack
it wouldn't matter if they were actually a threat - you still can't engage in war crimes...and you still can't deny them due process.

They seem to think that calling them a "threat" somehow justifies torture, extraordinary rendition, and illegal indefinite and detentions....that it somehow justifies war crimes.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HysteryDiagnosis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. The two plus million AMERICAN CITIZENS in the pokey are a
"threat" to Amurka.... it's just that they haven't taken to the idea of mass casualties. Aren't we lucky now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 06:41 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. No kidding..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
5. I'm starting a list of these most egregious presstitutes. n/t
Miller, Gordon and Glaberson, welsome to the list.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
6. The Army may assert that's true.. But until they're tried in a legitimate court
It's all just hot air and bluster.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 06:32 PM
Response to Original message
7. yeah ... they might just hang themselves in their cells, taking out ...
um ... how many in that type of "suicide attack"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GeorgeGist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
10. NO Sh*t
wow am I not surprised.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC