So Gonzo lied under oath? Isn't there some kind of impeachment precedent for doing that?

[originalpckelly]

Impeach the smarmy bastardo Gonzo!

[Xipe Totec]

1. Yes, but follow the process

Got to review the transcripts, check the facts, then cancel his sorry ass.

Let's take the time to dot the 'i's and cross the 't's.

Nail the bastard.

[grasswire]

2. apparently he's allowed a few days to correct his statements.

It's tradition.

[originalpckelly]

3. Yes, of course, and if he does it...

then we'll know even more that he was full of shit.

[dflprincess]

4. But his only options with a new statement are to tell the truth or tell more lies

Poor Fredo, what a hard spot for him to be in. :sarcasm:

[madokie]

5. it kind of looks like to me that he's toast no matter what he says now

it couldn't happen to a more deserving person

[napi21]

7. But his office released a statement tonight stating "He stands by his testimony!"

even though he still has a few days to make any corrections, I'd be very surprised if he did so after making that statement!

[spanone]

6. isn't that just against the law in general? citizens arrest???

[xchrom]

8. they have to let gonzo respond to the transcripts -- they have to

set up for their own prosecutor -- it wouldn't run through the doj.

and it would probably take the rest of the time that gonzo has to serve.

[Oeditpus Rex]

9. You must be confusing simple perjury

with perjury concerning oral sex.

[zbdent]

10. the precedent is that

he's lying under oath for a Repuke ... that means he will become the media darling of the Reich, and get his own show on Faux ...

[beyurslf]

11. What are they going to do? Refer it to the Justice Dept that Gonzo leads

and Bush appoints? He can say whatever he wants and he knows it.