Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Richard Holbrooke: A Hillary Clinton Neocon

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Purveyor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 08:42 PM
Original message
Richard Holbrooke: A Hillary Clinton Neocon
Richard Holbrooke likes Hillary Clinton. In fact he may well be asked to serve as Secretary of State if she is to win the presidential campaign next year. Holbrooke, a Democratic adaptation of Henry Kissinger, loves her approach to foreign policy.

“She is probably more assertive and willing to use force than her husband,” says Holbrooke, a former adviser to Bill Clinton. “Hillary Clinton is a classic national-security Democrat. She is better at framing national-security issues for the current era than her husband was at a common point in his career.”

Holbrooke is an example of just how scary a Clinton administration would be.

--
If we track Holbrooke’s recent statements, the disturbing symbiosis between him and figures like uberhawk Paul Wolfowitz is startling.

“In an unguarded moment just before the 2000 election, Richard Holbrooke opened a foreign policy speech with a fawning tribute to his host, Paul Wolfowitz, who was then the dean of the Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies in Washington,” reported First of the Month following the terrorist attacks in 2001.

---eoe---

http://www.dissidentvoice.org:80/2007/07/richard-holbrooke-a-hillary-clinton-democrat/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
pocoloco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 08:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. She new exactly what she was doing when she voted for the IWR
and she stands by her vote!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 08:57 PM
Response to Original message
2. How nice...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bonito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 09:24 PM
Response to Original message
3. People just don't see the aipac angle same as with holy Joe.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cynatnite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 09:26 PM
Response to Original message
4. Oh for shit's sake...
Edited on Wed Jul-25-07 09:27 PM by cynatnite
of course he's going to praise her. She's running for president and he's hoping for a damn job if she wins.

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 09:28 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. ...
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
partylessinOhio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-25-07 09:27 PM
Response to Original message
5. I'm not for war, I'm for peace. I hate to think I won't have a candidate
that I can vote for in 2008. I certainly won't vote for any Repug.

I think we may be screwed again.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
farmboxer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 03:08 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. I will vote for a Democrat, if it's Hillary, I will "Still" vote for a
Democrat. When I compare Clinton with Bush, well, there is no comparison. I am so tired of hearing all the extreme hatred for Hillary, it reminds me of the Republican campaign against Bill and Hillary while Bill was President. Just compare Bill with Bush. I refuse to cut off my nose to spite my face.

If Hillary so bad; then why do Neocons hated her so much?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
partylessinOhio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. War is war. Whether a Bush war or a Hillary war - I don't want either.
Bush won't be running in 2008, so the comparison will be Hillary or another Democrat to one of the Repug candidates.

War is killing us in more ways than dead troops which are the most costly.

The truth is that Democrats enabled Bush to invade Iraq by giving him cart blanche war powers. They surrendered their oversight powers to him. So Democrats own their part of the war. This is very disturbing and really limits who I can support in 2008.

In that respect very few are better than Bush except for Dennis Kucinich.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 07:07 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC