Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Mrs. Ashcroft, did the President of the United States call you on the night in question?"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 04:39 PM
Original message
"Mrs. Ashcroft, did the President of the United States call you on the night in question?"
Why is everyone *STILL* dancing around this one?
by 8ackgr0und N015e
Thu Jul 26, 2007

Everyone knows Gonzales is lying.
Everyone knows Comey is a boy scout.
Mueller is now confirming Comey's testimony.
Of course, Mueller may just be trying to save his own hide.

But wait! There is someone with no ax to grind, no reason to lie. Why is she never mentioned by the media? Why is no one interested in publicly questioning her?

I'm talking about the person who set this whole drama in motion -- the woman who called Comey. This is a woman with impeccable conservative credentials. She is a devoted wife and mother. She is a seasoned lawyer in good standing. She is a respected member of her church. She is also a material witness with evidence that could crucify George Bush.

We're not talking about personally embarrassing questions. Actually, she just has to answer one question. It's about a phone call she received from the White House.

http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2007/7/26/161734/554
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Jack Bone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. Recommended
:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fridays Child Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 04:47 PM
Response to Original message
2. This gets a kick and a recommend!
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
King Coal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #2
62. Yes! Let Mrs. Eagle soar, like she never soared before!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fridays Child Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #62
63. LOL!
And let her roar, while she's at it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Klukie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 04:49 PM
Response to Original message
3. Great question
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Maybe she is going to be the last one called.
She is the last card in the deck that could force Busholini to fold.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tblue37 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 06:02 PM
Response to Reply #6
17. Well, they shouldn't wait too long.
And she should stay out of small planes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 01:10 AM
Response to Reply #6
35. Some talk a few days/weeks ago - pondering possibility John Ashcroft had testified in secret.
Perhaps Mrs. Ashcroft has already been in touch with the committee? :evilgrin:

They sure had a trap set for Gonzo. Perhaps an even better trap than we realize?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bjobotts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 02:05 AM
Response to Reply #35
37. It's true. Ashcroft did give testimony in private meetings before the committee
Surely someone on the committee asked him who telephoned his wife. The committee must know so apparently don't think it important enough to disclose at this time. I'd love to know.

If it was the president does that really mean anything ...legally?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 02:26 AM
Response to Reply #37
39. Sometimes, what is most important is what doesn't get talked about
Harry Reid was a boxer, wasn't he? A good fighter does not telegraph his punches ;)

It it was about illegal wiretaps and it was the pResident, could be some big ol trouble for the lot of them!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 07:41 AM
Response to Reply #35
44. I've been wondering--is she John Dean? or Martha Mitchell?
The DJC certainly seems to have rock-solid information so there's undoubtedly a very knowledgeable and highly placed leak...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chelsea0011 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 09:43 AM
Response to Reply #6
51. This is how pathetic the Bushies are that they would keep
lying so that the one person with Ashcroft while in recovery would even have to be called to set the record straight. And it won't even matter to these lowlifes because you know they will say they don't recall it the same way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 04:50 PM
Response to Original message
4. Recall that Gonzo absolutely refused to answer when asked if Bush had sent them.
Stone cold refused to answer.

This question, and the person it needs to be asked of, should be on the lips of everyone we speak to.

I will continuously kick this post until hell freezes over if that's what it takes for this one perfectly sensible suggestion to take hold.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frogcycle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 04:50 PM
Response to Original message
5. yeah, there've been a couple of posts on this
Edited on Thu Jul-26-07 04:52 PM by frogcycle
I think she is the coup de grace

They probably have an agreement with her not to put her on the spot until the deal is essentially done. Then all she has to do is say "yes, he called."

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=389&topic_id=1441785&mesg_id=1441880
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 07:37 PM
Response to Reply #5
22. "I called Mrs. Ashcroft, sure, to tell her I hoped John got well right fast."
Bada-bing, bada-boom.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 04:52 PM
Response to Original message
7. I wonder however if she was allowed to be in the room given the program was covert?
Edited on Thu Jul-26-07 04:53 PM by Perky
:shrug:

If she was in he room it constitutes a leak by Gonzo and Card. Bring back Fitz.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. A Special Prosecutor is essential in this case.
I suspect one will be appointed in Sept.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Comey said she was, and so were 3 other people (possibly just 1)
There were two FBI guards that Muller instructed not to force Comey to leave the room no matter who said what. They may or may not have been in the room, And then there was an aid to Comey who he testified was in the room. Comey said Ms. Ashcroft was in the room at least when they entered, and he did not say that anyone left the room or was asked to leave the room.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 04:57 PM
Response to Original message
9. Someone should ask KO to ask her the question ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressoid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 05:35 PM
Response to Original message
11. Suppose Chuck Schumer has considered calling her in?
Edited on Thu Jul-26-07 05:42 PM by progressoid
Or Leahy perhaps?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
12. video of hearing
and yes it was only 15 minutes long


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zGx3fVb_Aik&eurl=


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hi9dd_vMQbc&eurl=

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KoPdLxNyobY&eurl=

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2TI6MfkOKek&eurl=


http://www.tpmmuckraker.com/

Davis wants the House Judiciary Committee to have access to Mueller's notes, but Mueller seemed to resist turning them over. Without specifying much, Mueller said he kept notes on the incident because it was "out of the ordinary." Davis recommended that Chairman John Conyers (D-MI), and the committee's Senate counterpart, "make a formal inquiry to obtain those notes."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 05:44 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. This could be the final straw that brings Busholini down.
The question: Will anyone in Congress have the spine to move forward on this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blaze Diem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 05:47 PM
Response to Original message
14. "It will be a Woman who will "bring down" George Bush..
I recall conversations, some time ago, here on DU, about this statement.
some thought it was Cindy Sheehan, Valerie Plame etc.

Perhaps female thorn in Bush's heel will be Mrs Ashcroft.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. It would be a great irony if it was a Repug that brought
Busholini down, wouldn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frogcycle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #14
26. shades of Martha Mitchell! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 10:02 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. Martha Mitchell! I loved that woman. NEVER minced her words...to the chagrin of her husband!
:rofl::rofl: Poor, poor John.:7
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cmd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 07:57 AM
Response to Reply #27
47. MM - the Mouth of the Potomac
She was always good for a smile.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 01:06 AM
Response to Reply #14
34. It would be poetry. The soul of John Mitchell's wife, Martha, would smile.
Yes, poetry.

Beware the honest femme - one lesson the former Nixon-ites in this latest junta just won't learn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 07:45 AM
Response to Reply #14
45. Remember Martha Mitchell?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
monmouth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 05:59 PM
Response to Original message
16. I'm having a "Martha Mitchell" flashback......eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cameron27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. Yep, let's hope Ashcroft doesn't get the same
treatment the pigs gave Martha.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 02:13 AM
Response to Reply #19
38. I wonder if their electronic surveillance contributed
to the cancer that killed Martha Mitchell?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #16
23. And Mrs. E. Howard Hunt. Not to mention:
Edited on Thu Jul-26-07 07:46 PM by WinkyDink
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KAT119 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 06:05 PM
Response to Original message
18. KICK!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Klukie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 06:42 PM
Response to Original message
20. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 07:32 PM
Response to Original message
21. Kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_Leo_Criley Donating Member (553 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 08:01 PM
Response to Original message
24. k & r
:kick:

glc
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Auntie Bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 08:58 PM
Response to Original message
25. Good question that needs asking...and Leahy should be the
perfect man to do it.
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Evergreen Emerald Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 10:05 PM
Response to Original message
28. She is the first one I thought of when Gonzales was testifying.
She was bedside when the whole thing went down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KT2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 10:42 PM
Response to Original message
29. Wondered this myself
Gonzo has behaved as if there is no one who will contradict his contradictions!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 11:31 PM
Response to Original message
30. Good gracious
Edited on Thu Jul-26-07 11:31 PM by proud patriot
:D Let's hope she loves the Constitution . :patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lugnut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 11:32 PM
Response to Original message
31. K&R
Good question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudDad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 12:01 AM
Response to Original message
32. K&R
Edited on Fri Jul-27-07 12:02 AM by ProudDad
The plot thickens...


On Edit: Where's Butterfield when you need him???? One John Dean and a Butterfield and those assholes are OUTA' THERE!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeahD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 12:05 AM
Response to Original message
33. k & r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Senator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 01:34 AM
Response to Original message
36. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lindsey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 03:28 AM
Response to Reply #36
40. There has been a theme on DU that a blonde woman would be
significant in * downfall...Ashcroft's wife looks like she's keeping her hair blonde....interesting...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sampsonblk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 03:46 AM
Response to Original message
41. What does that solve? You lost me.
If Bush personally called her, then he is directly involved in this stupidity. But I don't see how this could lead to any type of prosecution.

Am I missing something?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 07:54 AM
Response to Reply #41
46. The SJC is getting rock-solid info indicating a very, very knowledgeable leak
privy to some very high-powered conversations.

Remember this woman? She, too, was the wife of an AG. She wasn't an official, but she knew stuff. Good stuff. And her principles would not allow to keep silent about what she knew. FWIW, she never testified--but she knew.

From Wikipedia (which barely brushes the surface of her importance in uncovering Watergate):

Dubbed “the Mouth of the South”, Martha Mitchell began contacting reporters when her husband's role in the scandal became known. At one time, Martha insisted she was held against her will in a California hotel room and sedated to keep her from making her controversial phone calls to the news media. However, because of this, she was discredited and even abandoned by most of her family, except her son Jay. Nixon aides even leaked to the press that she had a “drinking problem”. The 'Martha Mitchell effect', in which a psychiatrist mistakenly diagnoses someone's extraordinary but reasonable belief as a delusion, was later named after her. Nixon was later to tell interviewer David Frost (in September 1977 on Frost on America) “If it hadn't been for Martha Mitchell, there'd have been no Watergate.”


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martha_Beall_Mitchell

The Mitchells separated in 1973. Three years later, in advanced stages of myeloma, Martha slipped into a coma and died in Washington at age 57. She is buried in the Bellwood Cemetery in Pine Bluff.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Felinity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 07:18 AM
Response to Original message
42. K&R n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 07:36 AM
Response to Original message
43. K & R, Baby !!!
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DearAbby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 08:13 AM
Response to Original message
48. Did B*Shit order Gonzo and Card to that room?
inquiring minds what to know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 08:27 AM
Response to Original message
49. I'd Just Bet Bush Put Strong Soft Pressure On Ms. Ashcroft To Convince Her Husband To Sign
You know full well he did it, tried to get that woman to convince her husband to sign. I suspect that if her story is ever told we will all think a lot more of her for not doing it or we will thank the gods that she tried and was not successful. One way or another Ashcroft has moved up just a little bit in my estimation since he left office. At least he refused to do one bad thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
colorado_ufo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 09:42 AM
Response to Reply #49
50. * is thoroughly convinced of his own charm.
Since he thinks he pulls the wool over Laura's eyes, knows he has 99.9% control over the Sec. of State, and has managed to keep impeachment "off the table," he thinks he can manipulate any woman. (Except his mother, but then he probably doesn't think of her as a woman.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #50
56. One wonders how much influence good old Mom had on the boy
How on earth does one go about raising a son who is so utterly worthless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #50
72. K&R...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 10:00 AM
Response to Original message
52. Except from these people who were taught from the teat of Nixon
doing things "on behalf of the President of the United States" is the same as the President doing it--UNLESS the Presidents decides to come out publicly and completely remove himself from the actions. Based on what we've been told that Bush's Priority One absolute, unshakable loyalty to his circle (for as long as they show it to him), he'll just thumb his nose and raise a middle finger to Congress/American people and say nothing.

Remember, witness after witness have talked about their "oath to the President". It's true cult mentality with mafia MO. So, even if they did ask Mrs. Ashcroft (and personally, I'm not so sure that they didn't get this information from AG Ashcroft in closed session), Gonzo and the rest of the Bushetals would still state it as a "on behalf of the President". And the response to that should be: "The responsibility lands squarely at the feet of President Bush."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marnieworld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
53. and there's no executive privlege possible
no 5th ammendment issues. Nothing. I think it's a great idea to call her. She'll either tell the truth or perjure herself and I don't think that even the Ashcrofts are willing to do that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
54. . . . and she is beyond the reach of a bogus claim of executive privilege . . .
. . . or even a genuine one, if such a thing exists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #54
55. How about immunity from threats by the White House, she will certainly
Edited on Fri Jul-27-07 11:02 AM by whistle
...receive those if she testifies. After all she is the wife of a conservative appointee John Ashcroft and a devout republican. As such, she is expected to remain mute and say nothing and her reward is then eternal peace and security. But if she goes public all hell will break and she and her family will suffer the wrath of republican vengeance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
camusrebel Donating Member (29 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #54
57. It is irrelevant what Mrs. Ashcroft heard, saw
the hook in the fishes mouth is the fact that Ashcroft nor Comey signed a damn thing. The program was not re-authorized. They kept doing it anyway. Check and mate.
Blood's in the water, it's just a matter time.

Even more reason we gotta do deadeye dick first. Get your Rep. to sign on to kucinich's House Res. 333.......15 brave souls have done so. A few more and the process begins. The avalanche, the tsunami of evidence could make for a fairly quick ouster of the slimy reptile or more likely he will slither away, lookin for cover from hard time and the hangman's noose

Then, moron gets another vp...........THEN we send little georgie away for good. The best approach for many reasons, not least of which it will avoid no balls Pelosi being charged with doing it for her own gain.
Peace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #54
58. I hadn't considered that. Even if she isn't called to testify, she could be
another Mrtha Mitchell, onkly this time leaking to the SJC instead of the press.

SJC is getting rock-solid info; it's got to be someone privy to high level talk, but it doesn't have to be anyone official.

Very interesting point you make!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
camusrebel Donating Member (29 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #58
60. and if she does sing it will probably be
Dick on her lips anyway.
Cheney would not trust his puppet dunce with a call like that
That kinda putrid mud is heaven for him.


333. NOW. CALL YOUR REP.
Iran's "Gulf of Tonkin" moment could be any day. Their long wet dreamed of police state is just waiting a trigger, its all set up. If u dont believe it, read The Presidential Directive signed on May 9, and the Executive Order signed July 17. Time is not on our side people. If I hear "September" again, I may loose it. And for God's sake don't put all our future's apples in some far off fantasy land called 2008(really Jan 09). The rats are cornered. The only option their base breed knows is to lash out in a large way.

Call your Rep. this afternoon. Hound him over the weekend, we are close. Each one of us does create reality. Let's make it happen. I hereby designate this:

The Week-end We Began To Impeach Dick

Power to the people, right on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #60
61. ...


Welcome to DU anyway. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clovis Sangrail Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
59. I don't understand why this would be a big deal
even if it was Bush himself calling her.
:shrug:

Didn't Gonzo just testify that, yes, he did go to the hospital, but Comey "misunderstood" why he was there?
I think that's an obvious pile by itself, I just don't get how confirmation that Mrs. Ashcroft was called by the WH makes it any steamier.
Al already admitted to going there w/ Andy... and Mrs. Ashcroft isn't going to know what was said or done.

It seems for this to damn Bush 1)it would have had to have been him who called and 2) he would have had to say "Andy and Al are going to stop by the hospital to get John to override that Comey guy's decision as acting AG"

I'd say it's a safe bet the content of the call was along the lines of "Andy and Al are going to stop buy and try to talk to John about something".

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
64. Under what cockamammie legal theory will they extend Ex. Priv. to her?
Seems like everyday is just another revelation that "Everything Changed after Dick became the unit in the unitary executive.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MsRedacted Donating Member (263 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
65. At the risk of looking stupid. What does she have to do with it?
I've been busy and it's hard to keep up with the details.

Please enlighten me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DB1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #65
70. She was there and was alowing no visitors or phone calls while
because her husband was recovering from surgery. The WH bullied there way in. She most likely knows all the details.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MsRedacted Donating Member (263 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #70
71. Got it. I was in for the very same thing a few years ago. Let me tell you he
was in too much pain (or too drugged up on narcotics) to be making any decisions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emdee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 03:14 PM
Response to Original message
66. KICK
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 03:21 PM
Response to Original message
67. Chris Mathews, Lou Dobbs, Tucker look the other way on the real news that should be reported...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
68. I have NO DOUBT that she has answered this question for the Congressional Committees.
It is important to bear in mind how much more goes on in the background before a hearing than we see. The adage about a good attorney applies, "Do not ask a question you do not know the answer to."

And, we know the answer too. If it were not "Of course the President called" this line of questioning would have died by now!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #68
69. Martha Mitchell never testified either. I agree with you.
Someone is giving the SJC solid info. She'd be in a better position than most to know what happened at Ashcroft's bedside.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:34 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC