Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Power Play-industry executives plan to seek licenses to build at least 30 new reactors

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 10:55 PM
Original message
Power Play-industry executives plan to seek licenses to build at least 30 new reactors
Power Play
By Katherine McIntire Peters kpeters@govexec.com Government Executive July 16, 2007

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission hasn't licensed a new reactor in threE decades. That's about to change in a big way.

When Dale Klein left his job managing nuclear, chemical and biological defense programs at the Defense Department to become chairman of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission in July 2006, he had a singular worry: "I was afraid I would find a culture averse to making decisions," he says. NRC is about to take on a new high-stakes mission in nuclear power production, vastly changed since the 1960s and early 1970s, when the bulk of the nation's fleet of 104 nuclear reactors was designed. It's been nearly 30 years since the agency issued a license to build a nuclear reactor, but over the next three years, power industry executives plan to seek licenses to build at least 30 new reactors.

Klein, a nuclear engineer and scholar who spent most of his career in the University of Texas System before joining the Bush administration, says his worry was misplaced. Decision-making capacity at the agency, which in recent years has issued dozens of license renewals and requests for power upgrades, is robust, he says. Instead, he finds himself most concerned about atrophied business systems and seemingly mundane management issues - a severe space shortage as the agency recruits hundreds of new employees to handle the new licensing mission, a dependence on obsolete computer software for agency operations, and a billing and payroll system so antiquated that no vendor will maintain it.

Those management challenges co-incide with tremendous change at the agency responsible for licensing and regulating civilian uses of nuclear materials to protect public health, safety, security and the environment. It was a demanding enough mission even before utilities began informing NRC in recent years that they were planning to apply for dozens of new licenses to build and operate nuclear reactors. In anticipation of the new applications, which will start trickling in later this year and build over the next few years, the agency has begun staffing a new inspection office in Atlanta (most of the applications will be for plants in the South). And in January, it stood up a new directorate at its Rockville, Md., headquarters, the Office of New Reactors.

The hiring challenge is significant. The agency expects to grow from about 3,100 employees last year to more than 4,000 by 2010. For the most part, these will not be simple positions to fill, but rather highly skilled scientists, engineers and others with specialized knowledge and technical expertise - at a time when industry is looking to recruit many of the same skills. A study by the Government Accountability Office released in January found that about 16 percent of NRC employees are eligible to retire, a figure that will grow to 33 percent by 2010.

http://www.governmentexecutive.com/features/0707-15/0707-15s3.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 11:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. "High Stakes" is Right. They're Betting Our Lives
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spag68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 11:30 PM
Response to Original message
2. I'm not against nuclear
but I am against having these plants built and operated by the french.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SidDithers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-26-07 11:57 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Yah, 'cause you wouldn't want people with experience...
building nuclear reactors.

Sid
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 12:03 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. I know, I'm pro-green.
Excuse me, I mean pro-green-glow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IChing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 12:01 AM
Response to Original message
4. Boondoggle
I can have alternative energy plants up if you gave me the money
in three years minimum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 06:49 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC