Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Oh for Fuck Sakes: Prisoner found guilty of masturbating in his cell

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 04:19 AM
Original message
Oh for Fuck Sakes: Prisoner found guilty of masturbating in his cell
:crazy: You guessed it...in FLORIDA.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,,2135251,00.html
>>>snip
He was prosecuted after a female sheriff's office deputy witnessed him performing the sex act in his cell in Broward County, Florida, last November.

The case drew sniggers from the courtroom as prospective jurors were questioned about their own masturbatory habits and the only witness was asked whether she had considered calling in a Swat team to tackle the defendant.

In reaching their verdict on Tuesday, jurors decided that an inmate's cell was "a limited access public place" where exposing oneself was against the law.

Ms McHugh asked the 17 prospective jurors who among them had never masturbated. No hands went up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 04:22 AM
Response to Original message
1. Deja Vu all over again!
Be warned- we've got some here who are gonna show up
and tell everyone how RIGHT the guard was to press charges.

I shit you not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 04:25 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I guess they think a prison full of sexually repressed men
is a good thing? Aye Aye Aye.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jimshoes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 05:17 AM
Response to Reply #1
8. I followed that thread
I won't link to it because it's probably still active in GD. I found myself scratching my head at some of the responses in that thread though. (No not that head)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beam me up scottie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 04:27 AM
Response to Original message
3. It gets worse:
"Did other inmates start masturbating because of Mr Alexander?" Ms McHugh asked Ms Veal. "Did you call a Swat team?"

"I wish I had," the deputy replied.

Ms Veal, who has charged seven other inmates with the same offence, said she was not against masturbation, but she objected to Alexander performing it so blatantly. She told the court that most inmates masturbated in bed, under the blankets


So, Reverend, you're saying you had to watch 16 hours of porn flicks before you decided you'd been offended ?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Heidi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 04:27 AM
Response to Original message
4. The deputy has pressed charges against seven other inmates for similar "offenses"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuffleClaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 07:14 AM
Response to Reply #4
13. GOT to be a fundy
i wonder if she kept tapes of the offenders, for 'in depth study'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KitchenWitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 04:27 AM
Response to Original message
5. So I suppose urination and defacation in the cell are also prohibited
:sarcasm:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lvx35 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 04:37 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Yeah, what the hell???


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wednesdays Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 08:45 AM
Response to Reply #5
14. No, it's perfectly acceptable...
as long as it's done while covered with a blanket or something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 05:17 AM
Response to Original message
7. Each to his own...
I would think that better than other sexual gratification you hear about in prisons
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tech3149 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 05:20 AM
Response to Original message
9. If masturbation is a crime, I'm sooo screwn!!!!!!!!!!!! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cobalt Violet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 05:35 AM
Response to Original message
10. Such a waste of money.
I don't see how this protects the public at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cboy4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 05:58 AM
Response to Original message
11. This female deputy is surely a Republican. She sounds about as dumb
as a cardboard box.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Double T Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 06:13 AM
Response to Original message
12. What is a female sheriffs deputy doing in a men's cell block?
If this is the kind of BS our courts waste taxpayer dollars on, then we need new judges and a new court system.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gidney N Cloyd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 08:52 AM
Response to Original message
15. What's with making the jury answer questions about their sexual habbits?
That seems WAY out of line to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:20 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC