|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
NNN0LHI (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-29-07 08:00 AM Original message |
Bloomberg has no comment about his sex suit problem |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
woodsprite (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-29-07 08:16 AM Response to Original message |
1. It also shows that he'd fit right into the Repub party. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Arkana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-29-07 08:22 AM Response to Original message |
2. He and Giuliani seem to be kindred spirits. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Captain Hilts (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-29-07 08:44 AM Response to Reply #2 |
5. No, no they're not at all. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Smarmie Doofus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-29-07 08:40 AM Response to Original message |
3. She's got it all backwards. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratSinceBirth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-29-07 08:44 AM Response to Original message |
4. Is A Sex Suit Like A Leisure Suit? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Captain Hilts (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-29-07 08:45 AM Response to Reply #4 |
6. Not if you're a Mormon. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rucky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-29-07 10:34 AM Response to Reply #6 |
11. Mormon "sex suit": |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-29-07 11:34 AM Response to Reply #11 |
17. Ew. Just...ew. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-29-07 09:51 AM Response to Original message |
7. Bloomberg was a DEMOCRAT in 2000. Just sayin'..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NNN0LHI (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-29-07 10:14 AM Response to Reply #7 |
8. He may have had a D behind his name but he was never a Democrat |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-29-07 10:22 AM Response to Reply #8 |
9. Oh, PLEASE. Look at his stances on the issues before you make a fool of yourself. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NNN0LHI (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-29-07 10:36 AM Response to Reply #9 |
12. I will retract nothing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-29-07 10:45 AM Response to Reply #12 |
13. That's just absurd. If anything, he's more like a deceitful Democrat. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Captain Hilts (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-29-07 03:33 PM Response to Reply #7 |
18. That's exactly right. He's got no time to go to court no matter how feable the charge. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-29-07 10:27 AM Response to Original message |
10. Somehow I don't think this will derail him, if it didn't when he ran for mayor. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-29-07 10:46 AM Response to Reply #10 |
14. He's rich, he has billions to spend, he can buy all the media he needs to make it go away. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-29-07 11:22 AM Response to Reply #14 |
15. I agree--in fact, he already MADE it go away, LOL! They can't even reveal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jul-29-07 11:27 AM Response to Reply #15 |
16. It was probably a "Shut up and you will be rich" settlement. Hey, who wouldn't shut up? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Apr 26th 2024, 11:23 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC