liberaldemocrat7
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-30-07 11:31 PM
Original message |
Poll question: To those who run Windows Vista does your machine run faster than with XP? |
|
If you run Windows Vista does your computer run faster than when you ran Windows XP?
|
cynatnite
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-30-07 11:34 PM
Response to Original message |
1. I have a fairly new machine that had Vista pre-installed... |
|
It's far better than the other machine with the XP. As much as I complain about Vista sometimes, it does run faster and it makes very little noise. The other machine sounds like a damn airplane landed in my bedroom.
In other words, I can't answer your poll. :)
|
ChairmanAgnostic
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-30-07 11:37 PM
Response to Original message |
2. but that's on a dual chip Macbook. |
|
so I am not sure that is fair. In fact, I removed vista and went back to XP because of driver issues for printer, scanner, etc.
|
RamboLiberal
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-30-07 11:37 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Just broke down and got an HP laptop with Vista |
|
Wanted to find out what worked and didn't work before I had to start getting Vista on PCs at work. So far no major problems and seems as fast if not faster than XP. Only problem is a couple of legacy software apps we use at work that haven't yet gotten Vista ready.
|
Beelzebud
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-30-07 11:38 PM
Response to Original message |
4. I wouldn't upgrade from XP with it on an older machine, it's what I would put on a new PC. |
|
Edited on Mon Jul-30-07 11:39 PM by Beelzebud
People that are upgrading to Vista from XP will see performance losses if their hardware is 2 years old.
If you have older hardware, stick with XP. If you are getting a brand new PC, get it with Vista.
Vista is a good OS when it's running on new PC's.
|
havocmom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-30-07 11:42 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
|
Looking to replace an old computer and get another new one, both for work. Was a bit concerned with deciding about Vista. Some colleagues put it on their current machines and had complaints. Your observation is helpful since I am facing getting new machines anyway.
|
CRF450
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-30-07 11:47 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
8. Its a good OS IMO, but its a resource hog |
|
Get alteast 2 gigs of memory, its kinda slow with 1 gig which is what most new pc's have now. 2 gigs will really speed it up.
|
nadinbrzezinski
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-31-07 12:32 AM
Response to Reply #8 |
16. and dedicate an USB for memory |
|
they can now do that... in fact in two to four weeks I am getting a 4GIG thumbdrive for that purpose
|
havocmom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-31-07 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #16 |
20. Just got an external hard drive to nurse old PC along until new one gets here |
|
Then, transfer files, programs to new PC with LOTS of power? Thinking that would be the route to take.
Am I heading the right way?
I will use the external HD for backup/recovery if all goes according to plan.
|
nadinbrzezinski
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-31-07 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #20 |
21. Yes, in fact I have all my files on an external |
|
hard drive, and will do the transfer of files this afternoon
|
glowing
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-30-07 11:40 PM
Response to Original message |
5. Its faster if you have a dual processor, but if you don't it will take |
Beelzebud
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-30-07 11:44 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
7. Yep, and with Intel's new line, and price cuts on older duos, they're pretty affordable now. |
cynatnite
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-30-07 11:49 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
9. I made sure this new machine has that... |
Beelzebud
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-30-07 11:56 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
11. You'll be good to go then. |
liberaldemocrat7
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-30-07 11:55 PM
Response to Original message |
10. I run a Pentium 4 2.8 gigahertz with 1.5 gigabytes of memory. |
|
I'm not running a slow or an old machine.
Yes this poll goes to people who replaced XP with Vista on a relatively new machine they still run.
|
CRF450
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-31-07 12:01 AM
Response to Reply #10 |
12. P4's are nothing compared to the new cpu's now. |
|
My AMD 64 3400 is faster, but still nothing compared to the new cpu's like the Core 2 Duo lineup.
|
liberaldemocrat7
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-31-07 12:22 AM
Response to Reply #12 |
13. Ok, but Vista got referred to as something that would speed up an existing machine. |
nadinbrzezinski
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-31-07 12:25 AM
Response to Original message |
14. You really don't want an answer |
|
or rather you do
On this machine vista runs faster than on the older machine, but that is related to processor speed, memory and all of that...
On a machine with the same stats, vista runs slower... it is a memory hug and system hug
|
liberaldemocrat7
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-31-07 12:32 AM
Response to Reply #14 |
15. I do want answers. Most people so far say that Vista runs slower. |
|
So Micro$oft has done nothing systemwise really to improve the speed of existing machines so far in this poll.
|
nadinbrzezinski
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-31-07 12:34 AM
Response to Reply #15 |
|
On my new spanking machine it works, but this is a screamer. If it didn't run on this, we would have issues...
But here is what you do
You need a minimum of 2 gigs, preferably four
A good processor is a good idea, and if you can afford a top of the line vid card, it may be worth it
My question is, what are you going to use those machines for?
|
OneBlueSky
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-31-07 12:58 AM
Response to Original message |
18. I've read things about some really intrusive Microsoft spyware in Vista . . . |
|
anyone know if this is true? . . .
|
nadinbrzezinski
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-31-07 01:12 AM
Response to Reply #18 |
19. microsoft is a virus :-) |
|
on a serious note, nope, not heard of it YET
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:50 PM
Response to Original message |