npincus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-31-07 11:03 AM
Original message |
LOL- Ken Starr's law firm supporting Dems (Clinton) |
|
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=washingtonstory&sid=aRD.xjIxojM0:rofl: Can you feel which way the wind is blowing? :rofl: July 31 (Bloomberg) -- Lawyers at Kirkland & Ellis, the law firm that's home to Whitewater prosecutor Kenneth Starr and Bush administration official Jay Lefkowitz, have given more to Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign than to all of the top Republican candidates combined.
Kirkland, based in Chicago, is one of several corporate law firms that traditionally backed Republicans where lawyers are turning to Democratic candidates. Lawyers say the change is largely due to disenchantment with the Republican Party's social policies and the war in Iraq.
``The Iraq war has a very significant pull on people, but it's not just limited to that,'' said Kirk Radke, a New York partner at Kirkland who is fundraising for Clinton. ``There's the need for a better posture within the international community.''
Large U.S. firms such as Jones Day and Sidley Austin, which donated more to President George W. Bush in 2000 than to Democratic candidate Al Gore, are giving thousands more to Democratic hopefuls than Republicans. Top Wall Street investment banks and hedge funds are also giving more to Democrats.
Clinton, a New York senator, and Barack Obama, an Illinois senator, are benefiting the most from the largest law firms, according to the Center for Responsive Politics in Washington, a nonprofit organization that tracks political contributions. Five of Clinton's 10 largest donor groups are from law firms.
|
dkofos
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-31-07 11:04 AM
Response to Original message |
1. They must want something, and I'm sure HRC will give it to them!! |
Kingshakabobo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-31-07 11:06 AM
Response to Original message |
2. At least he knows she's "clean." n/t |
shain from kane
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-31-07 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
npincus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-31-07 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
5. well, she's got "cleavage" and everyone know's Ken's a pervert. |
shain from kane
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-31-07 11:12 AM
Response to Original message |
3. Ken Starr was separated at birth from Glenn Beck? |
spotbird
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-31-07 12:28 PM
Response to Original message |
6. Rupert Murdoch, Bush Rangers, |
|
now indirectly, Ken Starr.
|
npincus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-01-07 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
7. Richard Mellon Scaife? |
|
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/19/us/politics/19clinton.html?ex=1186113600&en=52c98626eeca20b3&ei=5070The so-called "Funding Father" of the Rightwing... Mr. vast RW Conspriator, himself. Christopher Ruddy, who once worked full-time for Mr. Scaife investigating the Clintons and now runs a conservative online publication he co-owns with Mr. Scaife, said, “Both of us have had a rethinking.”
“Clinton wasn’t such a bad president,” Mr. Ruddy said. “In fact, he was a pretty good president in a lot of ways, and Dick feels that way today.”
As for the conservative response to Mrs. Clinton’s campaign, Mr. Ruddy said, “The level of intensity and anger toward Hillary is not getting to the level that it was toward Bill Clinton when he was president.” He added, “She has moderated and developed a separate image.”
H. Yale Gutnick, a longtime lawyer for Mr. Scaife, said his client was unavailable for comment.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed Apr 17th 2024, 09:18 PM
Response to Original message |