Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why hasn't Senate Judiciary Committee subpoenaed Asscroft?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
npincus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-31-07 12:22 PM
Original message
Why hasn't Senate Judiciary Committee subpoenaed Asscroft?
Wouldn't Asscroft's testimony resolve the he-said (Comey), he-said (Gonzo) details of Gonzo's midnight visit to his hospital bedside and confirm Gonzo perjured himself on denials over disagreement in the DOJ on reauthorizing the no-warrant surveillance program, and the intent of his/ Card's creepy hospital visit?

I wonder why Asscroft hasn't been invited to clear this up?




http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/05/15/ashcroft.nsa/index.html

Gonzales said that he and Card had been urged by congressional leaders of both parties to take steps necessary to ensure that the unidentified intelligence program survive a looming deadline for its expiration. To do that, Gonzales said, he needed Ashcroft's permission.

At the time, Ashcroft was in an intensive care unit recovering from gall bladder surgery and Gonzales was Bush's White House legal counsel. Ashcroft had transferred the powers of his office to Deputy Attorney General James Comey.

"We went there because we thought it was important for him to know where the congressional leadership was on this," Gonzales told the Senate Judiciary Committee in his first public explanation of the meeting.

"Clearly if he had been competent and understood the facts and had been inclined to do so, yes we would have asked him," Gonzales added. "Andy Card and I didn't press him. We said 'Thank you' and we left."

Gonzales' version conflicts with Comey's.



http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/07/26/gonzales.testimony/index.html?eref=rss_topstories

Gonzales testified February 6, 2006, that "there has not been any serious disagreement about the ." However, he testified Tuesday that the purpose of a March 10, 2004, meeting between White House officials and congressional leaders -- referred to as the "Gang of Eight" -- was to inform lawmakers that Comey would not approve "a very important intelligence activity." That was when Comey was filling in for the hospitalized Ashcroft. Another official testified that the 2004 meeting was about the TSA. The senators called the contradiction in Gonzales' statements "deeply troubling."


When the issue came up again, John Negroponte, then director of national intelligence, described the "Gang of Eight" meeting as being about the surveillance program.




John Asscroft, come on down!



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ellenfl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-31-07 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. i thought they already had spoken w/ashcroft behind closed doors? eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hawkowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-31-07 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Right
You only need to subpoena people who aren't cooperating.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
npincus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-31-07 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. was it sworn testimony?
thanks for clearing that up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-31-07 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
3. and his wife. Hard to say how executive privilege could apply to her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC