Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

CNN: Pentagon to announce continuation of 'surge' into 2008

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-31-07 10:54 AM
Original message
CNN: Pentagon to announce continuation of 'surge' into 2008
Source: Raw Story

The Pentagon is expected to announce this morning that 20,000 troops will be rotated into Iraq at the end of this year to extend President Bush's troop "surge" through next spring, CNN reported Tuesday.

"They may have to reach down into the National Guard or Army reserve" to maintain the surge, CNN Pentagon correspondent Barbara Starr said, and may extend tours of duty to maintain the surge past the spring of 2008 in what was described as a "worst case scenario."

Military commanders began to expect earlier this year that the surge would have to be extended into next year. In an article that appeared in the Washington Post in May, Lt. Gen. Raymond T. Odierno, who manages day-to-day operations in Iraq, said the surge needed to last "through the beginning of next year, for sure." Odierno noted at the time that new regulations extending tours of duty to 15 months would allow for the surge to last through spring 2008.

"These will be the replacement troops on a 15 month tour of duty, as the troops that are there finish up their tours of duty," Starr said on CNN Tuesday. "Reading between the lines, what is interesting here, is these troops will allow the Pentagon to maintain the status quo."



Read more: http://rawstory.com/news/2007/Pentagon_to_announce_massive_continuation_of_0731.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
classysassy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-31-07 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
1. Without
funds?,I don't want my tax dollar used to continue this bloody war,enough is enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-31-07 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
2. Fine. Start drafting Republicans and their offspring for the job.
Chickenhawks Attack!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FormerDittoHead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-31-07 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
3. Seriously. What's next? Will we "leave it to the generals" to START wars? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-31-07 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
4. Why does bush hate the republican party ??
I bet those that have to seek reelection (unlike bush) aren't too happy about this news. And hey U.S. Senate fuck you too. I'm the decider and I've decided to piss you off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stressfulreality Donating Member (118 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-31-07 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
5. Bush - good job at ruining our armed forces, it's working!
so now when we have REAL THREAT such as China or Russia we'll be uber-fucked!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-31-07 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
6. As Colonel Cathcart increased the number of Yossarian's missions
This may very well turn into the longest war in US history.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dhalgren Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-31-07 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
7. Wow! And all of this is a whole month or more BEFORE
General Betraysus' report to congress. Now, why is he reporting to congress? I mean, what is the supposed purpose of the September report? No one, not the congress and definitely not the people, have any control or even the slightest say-so in regards to our military adventurism. The only way that we can even begin to make a difference is to cut off funding. But even that might not work. The dictator might just force the Army to fight on without funding - I mean who is the Commander in Chief? The Army will do as it's told, I mean, they are Bush's slaves, aren't they?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enrique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-31-07 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
8. "we need one more Friedman to get the job done"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Az_lefty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-31-07 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
9. gee, none of us saw this coming...
Edited on Tue Jul-31-07 12:04 PM by Az_lefty
Military commanders began to expect earlier this year that the surge would have to be extended into next year... Bullshit, they knew this going in!!! :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CottonBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-31-07 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
10. "...some tours scheduled to extend into early 2009. "
Edited on Tue Jul-31-07 12:11 PM by CottonBear
From another thread on this topic.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=102x2936287

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Defense Department said on Tuesday another 20,000 Army soldiers and Marines will be sent to Iraq for rotation duty, with some tours scheduled to extend into early 2009.

The new deployment of 17,000 Marines and 3,000 Army soldiers is part of a routine troop rotation separate from U.S. President George W. Bush's surge strategy to stabilize Baghdad with extra forces, said Pentagon spokesman Bryan Whitman.

Bush's surge boosted the U.S. force level in Iraq to 20 combat brigades in June. But Whitman said the new deployment of three Marine units and one Army unit would maintain an underlying base of 15 brigades that existed before the surge.

All told, the surge has temporarily added 30,000 U.S. troops and brought total U.S. forces to about 159,000.

"These rotations ... are not in any way associated with the current surge," Whitman told reporters.

"These forces have been identified to replace units and forces that would be coming out of Iraq," he said.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20070731/us_nm/iraq_usa_troops_dc
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=102x2936287


early 2009 would be the time of the next presidential inagural. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-31-07 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
11. shameful, enough is enough
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 08:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC