jaysunb
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-31-07 12:28 PM
Original message |
If Roberts were to die or become incapacitated |
|
and Bush tried to name Scalia Cheif Justice,I wonder would the Democrats rollover for it ?
|
atreides1
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-31-07 12:30 PM
Response to Original message |
soothsayer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-31-07 12:30 PM
Response to Original message |
2. he'll appoint scooter libby, or happy harriet again. or gonzo! |
spotbird
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-31-07 12:31 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Yes, nothing in their history indicates otherwise. nt |
LSK
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-31-07 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
9. except 7 new Senators ? |
|
Webb, Brown, Tester, Sanders, Whitehouse, McCaskell, Klobuchar were not there last time.
:shrug:
|
malaise
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-31-07 12:31 PM
Response to Original message |
4. Roberts was released from hospital a short while ago n/t |
LSK
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-31-07 12:32 PM
Response to Original message |
5. wasnt a post similar to this locked recently??? |
jaysunb
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-31-07 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
6. Why would such a post get locked ? |
|
It's a legit question and probaly an interesting conversation....
|
LSK
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-31-07 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
guruoo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-31-07 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
13. Still scratching my head over that one.... |
TechBear_Seattle
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-31-07 12:35 PM
Response to Original message |
7. Why should now be any different from the past? n/t |
Danieljay
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-31-07 12:36 PM
Response to Original message |
8. considering their past eff ups.. it would surprise me. Gullible bunch they are. n/t |
Bitwit1234
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-31-07 12:39 PM
Response to Original message |
11. bush can appoint anyone he wants for chief justice that is already on the court.He can't |
|
appoint anyone new without the democrats voting for it. They have the majority. AND there is no cloture..it is up or down .
|
TahitiNut
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-31-07 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
14. Not true. Even a nomination of a sitting Justice to be Chief Justice is subject to Senate consent. |
|
Edited on Tue Jul-31-07 12:58 PM by TahitiNut
:shrug:
One word: Rehnquist. (The Senate confirmed his appointment as Chief Justice by a 65-33 vote in 1986.)
|
onenote
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-31-07 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
|
Fortas was a sitting associated justice when Earl Warren announced he was going to retire. LBJ decided to elevate Fortas to the CJ position, and confirmation hearings were held. Fortas' nomination was held up by a filibuster and he withdrew his name from consideration. Initially he continued to serve as an associate justice, but subsequent issues relating to alleged financial improprieties led to his resignation a year later.
|
MonkeyFunk
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-31-07 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
|
Any candidate for Chief Justice has to be confirmed, whether he or she is already on the court or not.
|
shain from kane
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-31-07 12:42 PM
Response to Original message |
12. Fitting on the Dock of the Bay. n/t |
mzmolly
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-31-07 01:11 PM
Response to Original message |
guruoo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-31-07 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
|
literally the "fear of fear itself".
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 10:26 AM
Response to Original message |