Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

JoeMentum goes after "anti-war" Democrats.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-31-07 01:24 PM
Original message
JoeMentum goes after "anti-war" Democrats.
I wish that he'd just go home to the Republicans and whine to them about Hagel and Paul.

http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/lieberman-escalates-attack-on-iraq-critics-2007-07-31.html


Excerpts from The Hill’s interview with Sen. Lieberman

The Hill: How long do you see U.S. troops staying in Iraq?

Lieberman: I think some troops will be there for quite a while to secure the country, particularly from external threats. Look, I hope that this surge, which has always intended to be temporary, gets to a point sometime next year where it has succeeded enough in quelling the sectarian violence, particularly so that some of the troops that were part of the surge begin to come home. But my direct answer is that there is no explicit answer. The answer is that the troops will come home when the mission is completed.

The Hill: Obviously, a lot of Democrats don’t feel that way.

Lieberman: I’ve noticed that.

The Hill: How dissatisfied are you with you right now with the way this debate has been handled in the Senate, especially during the defense authorization bill debate?

Lieberman: I’m disappointed that I am in so small a minority among Senate Democrats in taking the position that I have. While I obviously understand and respect that Iraq is a difficult issue, and people take different points of views, I’m surprised and disappointed that the split has followed partisan lines so much. It shouldn’t be.

The Hill: Some of this criticism might seem surprising from someone who was the vice presidential nominee seven years ago. How far away from the Democratic Party do you see yourself right now?

Lieberman: Right now, certainly on Iraq, to some extent on some other foreign policy issues, like how do we confront Iran, how do we contain Iran, how do we deal with what that threat represents in the Middle East. To some extent on some defense issues, I have disagreements with most Democrats. But I agree with most Democrats on a lot of other issues, and a lot of domestic issues particularly.

The Hill: Are you open to switching parties and becoming a Republican?

Lieberman: I have no interest or desire in doing that. I wouldn’t foreclose it as a possibility, but I hope that I don’t reach that point.

The Hill: What would drive you over to that point?

Lieberman: Well, I guess I’d know it. It’s like Justice Stewart and his definition of obscenity: he couldn’t define it but he’d know when he saw it. I think I’ll know it when I feel it, but I hope I never get to that point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Mythsaje Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-31-07 01:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. Foreign policy via swatting wildly...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-31-07 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
2. I dunno. If Joe goes after Dennis, he might regret his foolhardiness of that choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-31-07 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
3. why does the M$M continue to interview this bozo?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bryant69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-31-07 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. The people of Connecticut and Senate rules have rendered this bozo very important
Unfortunately.

Bryant
Check it out --> http://politicalcomment.blogspot.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
regnaD kciN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-31-07 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. For the moment...
He currently holds the swing vote in the Senate. In 2008, however, that will change -- either (more likely) the Democrats will pick up several more seats and a larger majority or (much less likely, unless the Dems in Congress blow it completely) the Publicans pick up a seat or two and regain control of the chamber. In either scenario, JoeMentum becomes completely irrelevant.

At the moment, he's not planning to switch parties because he's convinced scenario #1 is the more likely, in which case he'll go back to being a "loyal Democrat" :eyes: , and hope to keep his hold on power via seniority. If he thought there was a better chance of the Publicans holding control of the Senate after next year, he'd have already made the jump while cutting a deal to have greater power in a Publican Senate. But he knows that's probably not going to happen, so he isn't burning any bridges to the Dems, although he's sawing through a few cables...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bryant69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-31-07 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Probably right
The other possibility would arise if he were thinking of retiring; I'm sure he could wrangle a Zell Miller special. A book, endless appearances on Fox News and the like pissing on Democrats, the Gravey train.

Bryant
Check it out --> http://politicalcomment.blogspot.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katsy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-31-07 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
4. joementum knows the definition of an obscenity...
he sees it in the mirror every day.

:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-31-07 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
6. Yes Joe, and we now have a new definition of obscenity: you nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-31-07 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
7. If it were Joe and Dick, and Dick and Hillary, and Edward and Dianne
that would be one thing.

But it's Joe and Barbara, and Joe and Edward, and Joe and Dick, and Joe and Hillary.

Senator, YOU are the problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-31-07 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
9. who cares what he thinks?
he`s a man with out a party
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enrique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-31-07 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
11. notice the interviewer is prodding him
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 11:44 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC