Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

House votes to reverse Supreme Court on pay discrimination suits!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-31-07 04:56 PM
Original message
House votes to reverse Supreme Court on pay discrimination suits!
House votes to reverse court on pay discrimination suits

July 31, 2007

BY JESSE J. HOLLAND

ASSOCIATED PRESS

WASHINGTON — The House voted today to reverse the Supreme Court’s decision limiting the time that workers have to sue their employers for pay discrimination.

The Bush administration has threatened to veto the legislation, pushed almost entirely by Democrats.

The House voted 225-199 to effectively remove the statute of limitations for pay discrimination lawsuits for longtime company employees, repudiating a decision by the high court’s five most conservative justices.

“Discrimination has no place in our law, no place in our hearts and no place because of technicalities,” said Rep. Robert Andrews, D-N.J.

The Supreme Court voted 5-4 on May 29 to throw out a Goodyear employee’s complaint that she earned thousands of dollars less than her male counterparts because of discrimination.

Lilly Ledbetter, a supervisor at Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.’s plant in Gadsden, Ala., sued right before she retired. She ended a 19-year career making $6,500 less than the lowest-paid male supervisor, and said earlier decisions by her supervisors kept her from making more.

more...

http://www.freep.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070731/NEWS07/70731059
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bbgrunt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-31-07 04:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. I am sooooo happy to hear that they are spending
their time with this so * can veto it--instead of IMPEACHMRNT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-31-07 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yes, IMPEACHMENT IS SUCH A WASTE OF TIME.
Edited on Tue Jul-31-07 05:07 PM by AndyA
Why, no other legislation could be passed if they were working on IMPEACHMENT.

I'd like to know what the hell the difference is:

Congress + IMPEACHMENT = no new legislation

Congress + new legislation + Bush veto = no new legislation

In the end, which would benefit the American people and the Constitution most?

IMPEACH THE SOB ALREADY!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-31-07 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Well, I didn't know the House could overrule SC decisions. My bad. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bbgrunt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-31-07 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. sorry--it is an interesting story and I think--without
reading the whole thing--that they rewrote the legislation to remove time limits. They didn't actually overrule the SC....but it is very frustrating to think that they are spending their time on legislation that will just be vetoed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-31-07 05:08 PM
Response to Original message
4. The repuke Senators will stop it from passing in the Senate.
If they don't, it's because they know the psycho will veto it. He'll take the blame and they'll get the credit for voting for it, even if they voted for it ONLY because they knew it would be vetoed.:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 27th 2024, 12:17 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC