Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

House overwhelmingly approves Ethics Bill 411-8 approval

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-01-07 08:54 PM
Original message
House overwhelmingly approves Ethics Bill 411-8 approval
House overwhelmingly approves Ethics Bill
By Richard Simon, Los Angeles Times-Washington Post
Published: August 02, 2007, 00:33
http://www.gulfnews.com/world/U.S.A/10143537.html


Washington: In the most sweeping overhaul of congressional ethics rules since the Watergate era, the House overwhelmingly approved a Bill aimed at curbing the influence of lobbyists and repairing Congress' image. ....

The Bill would impose new rules on lawmakers and lobbyists, requiring reports on the campaign cheques that lobbyists solicit from contributors and denying congressional pensions to lawmakers convicted of felonies......

"If there was one message that was abundantly clear based on the results of last year's election, it was that the American people want us to end the culture of corruption that has enveloped the legislative process," said Representative John Conyers Jr, Democrat from Michigan, chairman of the House Judiciary Committee. "We've heard that message loud and clear."

The Bill's 411-8 approval comes after two former Republican lawmakers -- Representative Randy "Duke" Cunningham of California and Representative Bob Ney of Ohio - and former lobbyist Jack Abramoff were sent to prison on corruption charges. ....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-01-07 08:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. Denying Pensions to Convicted Felons
about time for that--better have something about no pardon from the Pres, just to make it work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-01-07 09:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Just room and board
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-01-07 08:57 PM
Response to Original message
2. So....who is the IDIOT 8...are they Dems? Pubs? Who would vote against this BILL?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
That Is Quite Enough Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-01-07 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Unfortunately...
From: http://www.mcclatchydc.com/homepage/story/18571.html

"Six Democrats and two Republicans voted against it, including Rep. John Murtha, D-Pa., a defense appropriator and legendary earmarker, and Rep. Jeff Flake, R-Ariz., a critic of the earmarking process who saw the reforms as weak."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-01-07 09:31 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. I sure would like to hear Murthas remarks re this bill...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-01-07 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. delete
Edited on Wed Aug-01-07 09:20 PM by L. Coyote
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marions ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-01-07 09:24 PM
Response to Original message
6. OK what's the catch....
how come all those repugs like this bill? Must be no good.

Anybody know?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-01-07 09:26 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Another quality "bipartisan" bill
e.g. Dems (and the public) get hoodwinked again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
partylessinOhio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-01-07 09:40 PM
Response to Original message
9. This bill was discussed on CSpan this am, and is so full of loopholes
that it will do little to change the dynamics between Congress members and the lobbiests.

When it all comes to light, people will act shocked but for now it is vacation time and the players must recess.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marions ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-02-07 04:59 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. I figured that
just a little nod to "ethics", meanwhile bidness as usual.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:14 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC