Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

August 29, 1857.. "My loving Miss Patsy".. (get some kleenex)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-01-07 11:59 PM
Original message
August 29, 1857.. "My loving Miss Patsy".. (get some kleenex)
Edited on Thu Aug-02-07 12:05 AM by SoCalDem
http://scriptorium.lib.duke.edu/lester/lester.html

This is a letter from a slave to a former mistress..she's been sold several times, and hopes to reconnect with family & friends she left behind.. and to try to find out where her baby girl ended up..

This is from the wonderful Duke University Archives.. http://scriptorium.lib.duke.edu/scriptorium/

(I got tired of watching the bridge) :eyes:

two other great letters from two different women
http://scriptorium.lib.duke.edu/collections/african-american-women.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
alphafemale Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-02-07 12:06 AM
Response to Original message
1. That's heart breaking.
To think of all the lives that were ripped apart like that.

Also of how much a barrier even a hundred miles was at that time.

We think nothing of that now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-02-07 12:08 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Her handwriting was beautiful.. you can tell she could not spell
well, but it was easy to see how hard she worked to perfect her penmanship.. I wonder if she ever found her baby girl..or if Miss patsy tossed her letter into the fireplace..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Akoto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-02-07 12:10 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. That struck me as well.
Aside from the obvious impact of the words, her handwriting was beautiful!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alphafemale Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-02-07 12:15 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Well...obviously the letter was not thrown in the fireplace.
That it was kept all these years gives some hope there was a good resolution to this story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-02-07 12:22 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. You are right... My brain frizzled..(bridge overload)
:)

I just hope Miss patsy wrote her back :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alphafemale Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-02-07 12:34 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. You are right about the handwriting though.
It was actually once something people were taught and practiced.

That era passed along with the fountain pen.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-02-07 12:36 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. I still love fountain pens..
I used to love my Shaeffer pens & all the lovely colored ink... (in bottles)..that dates me :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alphafemale Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-02-07 12:48 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. In my family bad handwriting has been passed down genetic lines.
My dad, my sibs, their kids, my kids all have this tortured, strangled scratches we lay down that looks nearly identical to one another.

I also saw a sample of my grandfather's handwriting once (he died decades before I was born) and it was also the same.

And any time my dad would sign a note for me to take to school, the teacher would accuse me of forging it. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
renate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-02-07 12:57 AM
Response to Original message
9. I hope Miss Patsy was loving
Look at how Vilet's (Violet's?) last name changed when she was sold. Unbelievable how this happened, how this was legal, in this country just 150 years ago.

The pain is so unfathomable. How I hope that Vilet found her daughter.... :cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happyslug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-02-07 01:02 AM
Response to Original message
10. SOMEONE COMMITTED A CRIME, WHO TAUGHT THIS SLAVE TO READ AND WRITE?
Edited on Thu Aug-02-07 01:09 AM by happyslug
Sorry, but I had to write the above. Slavery in the US changed over time, becoming more brutal and harsh from 1800 till 1865. In many states it was illegal even to teach your own slaves to Read and Write starting about the 1830s. This had to do with the various slave revolts that people blamed on educated slaves and Free blacks. Some states even made it illegal to free a slave. Missouri for one made it even illegal to be a Free black. Mark Twain in Huckleberry Finn addressed this with Hunk's father complaining about a free Black man living in Missouri, but because the Free black man had NOT yet lived for six months in Missouri he was NOT a Missouri resident and could not yet be grabbed by the Sheriff and sold (this story takes place in the 1830s).

Maroons, escaped black slaves, were common throughout the South, both in the colonial period and post colonial period, but seem to have died out as you come to the pre-Civil war period. We have reports of Maroons hiding out in inaccessible parts of the south for years at a time (The reports we have of Maroons, generally are of attacks on such Maroons "towns" when they were located), but these fall in number as one gets closer to the Civil war. The longest period a Maroon town survived seems to have been about 10 years, but such Maroon towns died out in the two decades before the Civil War, do to less tolerance of such settlements from the white slave owning community. This reflected the harsher attitude the South had to blacks, both free and slave, that the south Adopted in the Decades before the Civil war.

Further Changes included bans on educating blacks, increase punishments on blacks (Both free and Slave) and even greater allowance of the the "Patrols" to kill blacks. Now the Patrols was a common law institution, but fell into disuse, other then the South, with the decline of the Militia with the end of any real danger from the Indians with the defeat of Tecumseh in 1814. In the South the Patrol survived for it was part of the mechanism to keep the blacks and slaves in their place. Every adult white male member of the Community had to serve on the Patrol. The day was set by the Sheriff. This date varied for each member of the patrol so that the roads were covered every day of the month. In colonial days it was tied in with the Militia, even in the North, but with the defeat of the Indians as a serious threat the Militia and the patrol seems to have died out (In the North the fine for NOT attending the monthly drill of the Militia was slowly lowered so that the more people would prefer to pay the fine than show up for the drill, by the 1830s most Northern states had replaced the fine with a head tax for some people preferred to show up for the drill then pay the fine).

The South, with its slave population, needed the Patrol to keep the Slaves from escaping, thus kept the Militia and its related institution the Patrol. In the 1850s the Militia and the Patrol was actually STRENGTHENED in the South do to fear of the Slave revolt (and by the desire of the Southern "fire-eaters" to leave the union after the adoption of the Compromise of 1850).

My point was how hard the South made it to be a Slave in the decades before the Civil War. Slavery was made WORSE over these years. Thus it is surpassing that a black female could read and write (or had someone write the letter for her). The situation was getting so bad something had to give and it ended up being Civil War.

One last comment, the history of the Militia. During the Colonial time period and till the 1820s the best Militia in the US (and probably in the world at that time) was the New England Militia. It was what drove the British out of Boston in 1776 and defeated the British at Saratoga a few years later (And had been the key to defeating the French between 1689 and 1763, the four wars that made up what is called the "French and Indian Wars"). The Middle States were not as good (Pennsylvania only forming its in 1750s do to pressure from the French). The south had the worse, more concern about slave revolts then fighting the French or Spanish (Through good enough to massacre Indians when called on to do such actions).

Thus after the Indians were defeated in 1810s the New England Militia went into rapid decline, the middle colonies were not that much behind them for it was deem no longer needed. The South kept its Milita and kept it in the tradition the Southern Militia always had, one of keeping the blacks down.

I mention the above because a lot of right wing opposition to Gun Control sites the Militia clause of the US. The right wing like citing the New England Militia, but most of the Right Wing are ideological descendent's of the Southern Militia not the New England Militia. I always like pointing out one of the first Orders issued By George Washington to the New England Militia when he took Command of them in 1775. He wanted all blacks disarmed. The blacks left the militia units AS DID MOST OF THE WHITES. George had to give in on this Order, but George came from the South and its Militia Tradition, and was facing the New England Militia where EVERYONE SERVED and the Militia was NOT intended to keep a set of the population down (Massachusetts would become the first State to abolish Slavery, an act considered radical at that time, becoming the ONLY STATE TO HAVE ABOLISH SLAVERY AT THE TIME THE US CONSTITUTION WAS WRITTEN in 1787). Just a comment on Gun Control and the Militia and Slavery.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-02-07 01:05 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. reading between the lines, i think that Miss patsy must have been
Violet's age, and perhaps Miss patsy taught Violet her own lessons:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happyslug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-02-07 01:13 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. Probably the situation, some owners found they needed slaves who could read and write
Many of these became leaders of the Blacks during Reconstruction. Some even serving in Congress during Reconstruction. Remember just because a law makes something illegal it does not occur, most such laws were to scare reformers then to interfere with a master and how he trained his slaves (and to give people on the patrol an excuse to kill some black.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-02-07 01:29 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. I read once that one of the reasons for "Jim Crow" was the fear that the black
legislators were TOO good...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happyslug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-02-07 01:44 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. Jim Crow really started in the 1890s
Edited on Thu Aug-02-07 01:44 AM by happyslug
You had some segregation prior to the 1890s but it was small (Mostly separate Church's and other Social Groups). In the 1890s the South wanted to destroy the now independent Blacks. In many counties the Blacks outnumbered the Whites and thus elected local black leaders (This was so bad in Mississippi that Mississippi abolished its Counties and replaced them with "Cities", this had the effect of dividing up the rural blacks into 2 of more "Cities". The Whites tended to live in the cities for the cities was where most legal work and Commerce occurred. Thus the trust of abolishing the Counties and replacing them with "Cities" was to divide the black votes between 2 or more "Cities" while concentrating the White Vote in that same "city'. All of this was to prevent to many blacks from electing other blacks even to local Government. Now some of these "Cites" are now solidly black and elect blacks to local office, but most of the state still divide the black population between these "cities" (remember most blacks in the South live in RURAL areas, except for the Major Cities as opposed to what Mississippi calls Cities.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-02-07 02:26 AM
Response to Original message
15. Such a sad shameful
period in this nation's history. :cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 08:47 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC