Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NYT editorial, "An Incomplete Energy Bill": Fuel economy is off the table

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-02-07 10:00 AM
Original message
NYT editorial, "An Incomplete Energy Bill": Fuel economy is off the table
An Incomplete Energy Bill
Published: August 2, 2007

The House will begin debating Friday on a generally useful energy bill that would increase energy efficiency, encourage more responsible oil and gas development on public lands and stimulate investment in cleaner fuels. Yet the bill is incomplete. If it truly hopes to address the problems of global warming and energy independence, three vital issues need to be addressed.

The first is fuel economy. The House bill does not now require stronger fuel economy standards — a critical part of any energy policy that seeks to reduce oil imports and greenhouse gases. An amendment floated earlier by Representative Ed Markey would raise fleetwide averages — untouched by Congress since the Ford administration — from 25 miles per gallon to 35 miles per gallon. The Senate has already approved a comparable provision.

Powerful members of the House are opposed, however, and Speaker Nancy Pelosi, unwilling to risk the bill’s delicate consensus, appears to have decided not to hold any votes on the fuel economy issue at all. We wish she had taken the risk, but now that she has decided otherwise her task is to ensure that a strong 35 mile-per-gallon standard emerges from a Senate-House conference and reaches the president’s desk.

Also missing is a national renewable electricity standard that would require utilities to generate a certain percentage of their electricity from wind power and other renewable sources. An amendment requiring such a standard has been endorsed by environmentalists, labor, venture capitalists, farmers and, in this case, Ms. Pelosi. Because the Senate bill has no comparable provision, House approval is vital to carry the idea to a conference.

Finally, somebody has to make sure that the rush to develop ethanol from corn and other sources is done in an environmentally responsible manner....

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/02/opinion/02thu1.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC