Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A call to dismantle NCLB:

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-02-07 07:19 PM
Original message
A call to dismantle NCLB:
If you are going to step up to the plate and help get rid of this harmful mess, now is the time. It comes up for a vote very soon.

Here's the petition from the Educator Roundtable:

To: U.S. Congress

We, the educators, parents, and concerned citizens whose names appear below, reject the misnamed No Child Left Behind Act and call for legislators to vote against its reauthorization. We do so not because we resist accountability, but because the law's simplistic approach to education reform wastes student potential, undermines public education, and threatens the future of our democracy.

Below, briefly stated, are some of the reasons we consider the law too destructive to salvage. In its place we call for formal, state-level dialogues led by working educators rather than by politicians, ideology-bound "think tank" members, or leaders of business and industry who have little or no direct experience in the field of education.

The No Child Left Behind Act:

1. Misdiagnoses the causes of poor educational development, blaming teachers and students for problems over which they have no control. <1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9>

2. Assumes that competition is the primary motivator of human behavior and that market forces can cure all educational ills. <1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6>

3. Mandates data driven instruction based on gamesmanship to undermine public confidence in our schools. <1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 >

4. Uses pseudo science and media manipulation to justify pro-corporate policies and programs, including diverting taxes away from communities and into corporate coffers. <1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12>

5. Ignores the proven inadequacies, inefficiencies, and problems associated with centralized, "top-down" control. <1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9>

6. Places control of what is taught in corporate hands many times removed from students, teachers, parents, local school boards, and communities. <1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6>

7. Requires the use of materials and procedures more likely to produce a passive, compliant workforce than creative, resilient, inquiring, critical, compassionate, engaged members of our democracy. <1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7>

8. Reflects and perpetuates massive distrust of the skill and professionalism of educators. <1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6>

9. Allows life-changing, institution-shaping decisions to hinge on single measures of performance. <1, 2, 3>

10. Emphasizes minimum content standards rather than maximum development of human potential. <1, 2, 3, 4>

11. Neglects the teaching of higher order thinking skills which cannot be evaluated by machines. <1, 2, 3, 4>

12. Applies standards to discrete subjects rather than to larger goals such as insightful children, vibrant communities, and a healthy democracy. <1, 2, 3>

13. Forces schools to adhere to a testing regime, with no provision for innovating, adapting to social change, encouraging creativity, or respecting student and community individuality, nuance, and difference. <1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9>

14. Drives art, music, foreign language, career and technical education, physical education, geography, history, civics and other non-tested subjects out of the curriculum, especially in low-income neighborhoods. <1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7>

15. Produces multiple, unintended consequences for students, teachers, and communities, including undermining neighborhood schools and blurring the line between church and state. <1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8>

16. Rates and ranks public schools using procedures that will gradually label them all "failures," so when they fail to make Adequate Yearly Progress, as all schools eventually will, they can be “saved” by vouchers, charters, or privatization. <1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13>


Here's the link:

http://www.educatorroundtable.org/petition.html

Thanks for taking the time to read and respond.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
countingbluecars Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-02-07 07:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. Done
because NCLB saps the joy of teaching and learning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-02-07 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Thank you.
As I gear up to head back to work next week, I'm thinking about how I want to bring energy, enthusiasm, creativity, curiosity, and joy to the classroom.

Not about how I want to make us all miserable with scripted curriculum mandates and tests.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
prairierose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-02-07 07:37 PM
Response to Original message
2. I joined the Educator roundtable..
several months ago because of this petition. I signed it at that time. I hope that, because you have brought it here, many more people here will sign the petition.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-02-07 07:42 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I hope so, too. I'm signer # 1900 something.
28,000+ people have signed since I did. I hope that's enough to open ears and minds in Washington.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ulysses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 05:51 AM
Response to Original message
5. back up there with you.
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 07:24 AM
Response to Original message
6. 30434 Signatures Total. NCLB has got to go and I'll be happy to hasten its demise.
Edited on Fri Aug-03-07 07:25 AM by blondeatlast
Edit: To the Greatest page for this one!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #6
11. Thank you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondie58 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 07:34 AM
Response to Original message
7. done and I will send to all on my address book
It is absolutely ludicrous to have to take a test to take a test. That is all that it has turned into. The educators are so worried about people taking it and passing it, that the students don't really matter anymore.

Last year, during CSAP my kid was ill and we got several borderline nasty calls stating that she had better be in class the next day or else....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #7
13. Thank you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AwakeAtLast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 07:41 AM
Response to Original message
8. K & R and here's why:
My school failed AYP this year. We have been open for 5 years and have INCREASED our test scores every year we have been open. Our scores increased last year as well. Why did we fail AYP? Because one sub-group, our special ed. students did not have a high enough percentage of students passing. All of our students made gains except for a very few special ed. students, so the whole school fails. How is that even considered educationally sound? x(

The students who are penalized the most by this, BTW are the special ed. students who made great improvements, but are categorized as failures. x( x(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. That is, unfortunately, and not coincidentally,
a familiar story. The idea that high-stakes testing/accountability actually does something to improve student achievement is wrong. Calling schools "failed" who are teaching kids and moving them forward is wrong. Expecting test scores to continue to improve every year until everybody is "above average" is ludicrous, to say the least.

Using propaganda about "closing the achievement gap" to destroy public education should be criminal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-05-07 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #8
23. As a special ed teacher, I agree whole heartedly
This law has destroyed the quality of special ed programs we once had. It also takes all opportunities away from my students to achieve and be recognized for their success.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
porphyrian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 07:50 AM
Response to Original message
9. Done, but I'm not convinced Congress will do a damn thing. - n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bonito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 07:51 AM
Response to Original message
10. Done K&R n/t
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ulysses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 04:52 PM
Response to Original message
14. since it's been a few hours...
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Thanks, Uly.
I feel like I've been a broken record on NCLB since it was signed into law 5 years ago; I never had any illusions, because I taught in California under Pete Wilson. We had our own state version, and I was already seeing it at work.

It may not be as fascinating as other atrocities, but it is a major factor in the march to destruction we've been on since 2000. It's not going to wait for a Democratic President in '08, if we could elect one who recognizes the problem. It's up for renewal NOW.

I've done everything I know to do; I guess I don't play the waiting game very well, lol.

I'm in Portland at our state superintendent's "summer institute" for 3 days next week. I expect to hear a lot more about state efforts to comply with NCLB. Instead of time spent talking about teaching and learning, it will be time spent crunching numbers, talking about scores, and talking about compliance. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ulysses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. you're not keeping your powder dry?
I guess I don't play the waiting game very well, lol.

tsk, tsk.

:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-05-07 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. I'm not a very good politician, or so I'm told.
I'm not pragmatic enough, not disingenuous enough, not polished enough, not vague enough.

I'm open, straightforward, and don't want to dance around. I'm way too blunt, and I want to act, or not, and move on.

I started to say that I wouldn't make much of a performer on stage, either, but that's not true. I did a lot of storytelling in earlier years, and I'm told I have a talent. That's for entertainment, though. When it comes to taking care of business, I just want to get it done and move on to what ever comes next.

Given the opportunity, I'll light my powder in a strategic position designed to put an end to pontificating and to pretense. SOMETHING will move, or take a direct hit. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spike89 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 07:05 PM
Response to Original message
16. Wish we had an ed plan to replace it
NCLB is horrible legislation and needs to be seriously revised, or better, tossed aside. However, it simply isn't going to fly politically to simply let it die. No politician will stick out his/her neck to abolish an education program like this...the repugs would slaughter them with "against educating kids, against accountability, in bed with the teacher unions,..."
The only practical way to get rid of such horrid messes is to try and neuter them until you can rework them into something that works. I haven't heard of any options with traction for doing this, so I'm guessing if our congress critters are given the choice "support children or vote against NCLB" they'll vote for it and hope the Democratic president in '09 can get something good through. Sad, but that's what happens when you have PR-savvy jerks in charge for 6-years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ulysses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. it really wouldn't be difficult.
1. Replace the punitive measures with the reverse. Where schools are having difficulty meeting standards, provide more help and resources, not less.

2. Read IDEA, and know what the range of students with disabilities truly is. Understand that a child with an IQ repeatedly measured below 55 (I've taught her) can be placed in a mildly intellectually disabled class based on her adaptive skills and expected to pass tests that she never will no matter what threats you level at the school. I'm all for being tough about teaching kids with disabilities, but be realistic.

That provides two starting points. Dems could come up with an alternative education law if they wanted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-05-07 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #16
24. What's wrong with letting the states and local school districts run their own schools?
I see this as a states rights issue. Get the federal govt out of our schools. This is a diverse country. What works in Virginia may not be what works in Texas.

I am especially angry about this because the state where I teach had an outstanding accountability program in place before NCLB. Many states were also already implementing quality state wide assessments. I had been to training in other states. Teachers in my state were training teachers from all over the country; our program was that good.

Then NCLB came into our world and in order to meet its mandates, we have had to water down our state assessments. We went from a nationally recognized criterion based assessment (that gave us REAL and useful data about our kids) to a crappy norm based standardized test. Our kids used to get performance based assessments and they actually used problem solving strategies on our tests. They wrote and wrote and wrote. Now they take their best guess and fill in bubbles!!

In special ed, the NCLB testing mandate has been especially horrific. We used to give annual individually administered achievement tests. I could actually score the test the same day the kid took it and use the results to plan instruction for an entire year. Now my kids take a test they can't read and they fill in bubbles. The results (which are meaningless anyway) come back no earlier than 5 months after the kids take the test.

NCLB needs to be scrapped. It is NOT HELPING ANY OF OUR KIDS. If our Congress critters really want to support kids, they will throw this damn law out.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 07:55 PM
Response to Original message
18. But...but...how will NEIL BUSH make more MILLIONS?!
http://www.commondreams.org/headlines06/1022-02.htm

P.S. This was the true raison d'etre for NCLB: Bush $$$.
IMHO, of course.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 08:36 PM
Response to Original message
20. Neil Bush is running one of the necessary programs: COW . . .
Curriculum on Wheels -- very costly for schools which fail and have to pay to get out of jail!!!!

Leave no child behind is ignorance on wheels --

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-05-07 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
22. Yes I signed it a few months ago!
Great petition!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 02:52 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC