Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama indecisive on nuclear weapons - what the hell is he saying?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Herman Munster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 07:35 AM
Original message
Obama indecisive on nuclear weapons - what the hell is he saying?
Edited on Fri Aug-03-07 07:35 AM by Herman Munster
So Obama is saying nuclear weapons are OK as long as it's not against civilians?????????????



---

In an interview with the Associated Press today, Barack Obama said he would not use nuclear weapons “in any circumstance” to fight terrorism in Afghanistan and Pakistan.

“I think it would be a profound mistake for us to use nuclear weapons in any circumstance,” Mr. Obama said, with a pause, “involving civilians.” Then he quickly added, “Let me scratch that. There’s been no discussion of nuclear weapons. That’s not on the table.”
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 07:59 AM
Response to Original message
1. The more he drops in the polls the sillier he gets.
He only has himself to blame for all this. If he had not listened to the people who told him to jump into the presidential race so early, he would have been able to get a real campaign platform going. He would have been able to find out what the people want, what this country needs.

Remember he was the first one to announce he was running for the nomination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beastieboy Donating Member (288 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 08:11 AM
Response to Original message
2. His handlers are not very good at their job, or he is another Joe Biden
and can't control what comes out of his mouth. This is what worries me about him in the general election. The republicans will pounce on every misstep.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LBJDemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
3. So fucking what?
He said he wouldn't use nuclear weapons against civilians and then quickly reflected on it and clarified.

Big deal.

Talk about grasping at straws.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Not what happened
He has restated he will not use nuclear weapons on terrorists in Afghanistan and Pakistan. The scratch remark is used all the time, reporters are supposed to respect it. In this case, a reporter leaked his remarks, and didn't add the qualifier that the question was about terrorist targets in Pakistan and Afghanistan. The danger is from whoever is willingly stirring up international fervor for a cheap political stunt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
4. he just doesn't have a personal reservoir of knowledge to draw from
on some of these critical foreign policy issues. I think he's way too comfortable in his ability to handle these questions and hasn't done enough homework to prepare.

The other thing I'm sensing is a tendency to draw on mainstream responses which may not mesh with other pronouncements he's made. The doesn't seem to be a cohesive understanding of these important issues. Just my impression though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terryg11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
6. not a big deal
sounds like he made an odd mistake but nothing more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mdmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-06-07 01:58 PM
Response to Original message
7. Only Dick Cheney and terrorist would use nukes on innocent folk
Perhaps HRC too. She is too "presidential" to do the right thing. Might makes right my friend.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:46 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC