Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Kerry Applauds Senate Passage of SCHIP

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 10:59 AM
Original message
Kerry Applauds Senate Passage of SCHIP
08/03/2007

Kerry Applauds Senate Passage of SCHIP

Kerry Challenges Bush to Put Children before Politics

WASHINGTON D.C. – Senator John Kerry made the following statement today, after the Senate overwhelmingly passed a bipartisan expansion of the State Children’s Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) for low-income, working Americans. Kerry offered an amendment to the bill to boost the funding of SCHIP to $50 billion dollars by rolling back Bush’s tax cuts for millionaires. The Kerry amendment fell short of passage, though the House approved a $50 billion package similar to the Kerry plan – setting the stage for high-stakes negotiations in the fall between the two versions.

“All of America’s children deserve to grow up healthy, and this vote is a step forward in the fight to get millions of kids health care. This bill is a victory for their parents, who will no longer have to choose between caring for their children when they are sick and putting food on the table. We could have gone further by rolling back Bush’s tax cuts for millionaires and insuring a million more kids, and I’m proud of my colleagues who joined me in pushing for additional SCHIP funding. But today we have a strong bill and I challenge this President to do the right thing by our kids and reconsider his veto threat. This critically important – and overwhelmingly bipartisan – improvement in health coverage for our nation’s children must move forward.”

The Bill included a Kerry Amendment that Creates a Task Force to Enroll Eligible Children of Small Business Employees and the Self-Employed.

Senator Kerry secured an amendment to the bill that requires the Small Business Administration to team with the Secretary of HHS, the Secretary of the Treasury, the Secretary of Labor, and SBA’s partners to educate small business owners and employees about the eligibility and enrollment requirements for S-CHIP. A recent Urban Institute study found that one out of every four SCHIP eligible children with parents who work for a small business or are self employed, are not enrolled. These children are missing the coverage they deserve at more than twice the rate of eligible children whose parents work for large businesses.

· The Senate Bill Provides Coverage For Over 3 Million Uninsured Kids. Currently, 6.6 million children receive their health care coverage through the Children’s Health Insurance Program. In addition to preserving coverage for those children, the bi-partisan Senate bill would also cover an additional 3.2 million kids.

· The Senate Bill Helps States Increase Enrollment. The bill provides $100 million in new grants to fund state outreach and enrollment efforts to reach more children eligible for CHIP and Medicaid. The bill also allocates $49 million for a demonstration project to streamline the enrollment process for low-income children already eligible for coverage.

· The Senate Bill Improves Outreach to Children in Minority and Disadvantaged Communities. In addition to improving outreach to uninsured racial and ethnic minority children, the bi-partisan Senate bill also seeks to increase awareness of the Children’s Health Insurance Program in rural America.

· The Children’s Health Insurance Program Has Played a Vital Role in Covering Minority Children. According to Families USA, the Children’s Health Insurance Program has played a vital role in covering minority children. Approximately 50 percent of African-American and Latino children respectively are covered either by Medicaid or the Children’s Health Insurance Program.

· The Senate Bill Improves Mental Health and Dental Coverage. The measure requires states that offer mental health services to provide coverage for those services on par with medical benefits offered under the Children’s Health Insurance Program. The measure also provides $200 million in grants to states to improve dental coverage for children.

· The Senate Bill is Fiscally Responsible. As with the current Children’s Health Insurance Program, the bi-partisan measure calls for a moderate increase in the tax already imposed on tobacco products. Specifically, the measure creates new revenue from a 61-cent increase in the excise tax on cigarettes, as well as a proportional increase on all other tobacco products.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kajsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
1. Why are they always targeting tobacco?
Edited on Fri Aug-03-07 11:09 AM by Kajsa

I'm glad that the children are getting much needed
health insurance.

But why is it always tobacco that is the target?
Because smokers are fair game?

Why not alcohol?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Where is tobacco grown?
Which politicians get the most tobacco money?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kajsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Hi William,

I know- the Repubs have big tobacco in their pockets, but
they aren't the ones paying the excise taxes.

The smokers are and they include a wide variety of people.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Telly Savalas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. I understand the rationale, but it's lazy and cynical policymaking.
Tobacco is consumed disproportionately by people of lower incomes, so this is in essence a regressive tax.

Even if tobacco was consumed evenly among all socioeconomic classes, it would still be regressive in as much as much as all consumption taxes eat up a larger percentage of income for poorer people.

Yes, tobacco use is stupid, but if tobacco-users did the right thing and quit, then funds would dry up for the health care program. A cancer stick tax may be rationalized as a deterrent to smoking or as a piggy bank, but not both at the same time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MODemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 10:17 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. Tobacco is grown in and around Weston ,Missouri
I live four miles from that town; it's a booming business for the tobacco growers. For many, it's their only source of income.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lazer47 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
2. And it is VETO proof
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigwillq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. You should've heard me yelling and screaming
Edited on Fri Aug-03-07 06:30 PM by bigwillq
last night when the final tally was released and it was 68 YAYs! :bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 08:38 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. Kick! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYVet Donating Member (822 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
3. I am against this bill for one reason.
This bill raises the eligibility level to 400% of the poverty level, which for a family of 4 is over 84,000 dollars a year.

If you make that much, you can afford your own damn insurance.
If you can't you are living outside your means and that is not my fault.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Where does it say that? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 10:23 PM
Response to Reply #3
13. Depends where and whether somebody in your family has a preexisting condition.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alarimer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 10:36 PM
Response to Reply #3
15. That's not that much money
Especially when most insurance plans are hideously expensive.

Just one more reason we need universal, single-payer health care right now!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
6. Kick! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 09:36 PM
Response to Original message
10. Looks like mental health parity passed with it too, anyone confirm?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
politicasista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 10:27 PM
Response to Original message
14. kick n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 09:37 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC