Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Newsweek Baghdad Blog: US Congress is fooling itself regarding permanent bases

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 02:50 PM
Original message
Newsweek Baghdad Blog: US Congress is fooling itself regarding permanent bases

http://blog.newsweek.com/blogs/checkpointbaghdad/archive/2007/08/03/digging-in.aspx

Digging In
Friday, August 03, 2007 1:55 PM
By Joe Cochrane


Visiting a U.S. military base in Iraq can feel a little like a trip down Alice’s Wonderland rabbit hole. Inside the barbed-wire fences and flood lights, and just past the tanks and attack helicopters, is a slice of Americana. In between their dangerous duties, soldiers talk about the latest sporting events back home, work out in fully equipped gyms, go to the movies, and eat Pop-Tarts and Baskin Robbins ice cream in mess halls adorned with state flags and university banners as Fox News blares in the background.

It’s almost like home, these forward operating bases, known in military jargon as FOBs. (And those whose duties do not require them to leave the base are known as Fobbits.) Clearly, the ambience is no accident. Back in Washington, D.C., the Congress and White House are heatedly debating when to bring the troops home from Iraq. But a visit to one of these FOBs seems to suggest something else: the troops are digging in for a long stay.

From what I’ve seen, the U.S. military’s continuing infrastructure expansion at some forward operating bases, especially those with landing strips for fixed-wing aircraft, clearly signals that Iraq will be America’s South Korea or Germany of the 21st century. Bush administration officials have hinted as much. Sure, U.S. soldiers will rotate in and out, but the armed forces are here to stay.

...

Congress is fooling itself. They want U.S. military operations in Iraq limited to border security, counterterrorism and training the Iraqi Army. That alone, according to various analysts, would require that at least 75,000 American troops remain in Iraq indefinitely. However much they dress up the bases, those soldiers are still going to be a very long way from home.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
gasperc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 02:54 PM
Response to Original message
1. we couldn't have built a better cluster fuck if we tried
oil
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
2. Mrs. Clinton Has Proven Newsweek Is Wrong
By being in favor of keeping troops in Iraq indefinitely.

So there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 03:00 PM
Response to Original message
3. And China waiting with a smile.
And no history of killing Muslims or Iraqis or anyone in that neighborhood.

They never have to lift a trigger finger. They will get it all without firing a shot.

All they have to do is wait for us to be exhausted and broken...and that day is tomorrow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
4. Yes, the American Empire is here to stay. But at what cost?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:34 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC