Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Judge sides with CIA in suit over Plame memoir

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 03:47 PM
Original message
Judge sides with CIA in suit over Plame memoir
Judge sides with CIA in suit over Plame memoir

By Edith Honan
Reuters
Friday, August 3, 2007; 3:21 PM

NEW YORK (Reuters) - The ex-spy whose unmasking led to the conviction of Vice President Dick Cheney's top aide cannot disclose the dates she worked for the CIA because the details were never declassified, a federal judge has ruled.

The decision, made public on Friday by U.S. District Judge Barbara Jones, was a victory for the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency, which sought to block former agent Valerie Plame Wilson from including the dates in her upcoming memoir, "Fair Game."

Plame, along with publisher Simon & Schuster, filed a lawsuit in May against Mike McConnell, the U.S. director of national intelligence, and CIA Director Michael Hayden, seeking to stop the CIA from interfering with publication of her book.

"The information at issue was properly classified, was never declassified, and has not been officially acknowledged by the CIA," the judge said.

more...

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/08/03/AR2007080301363.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
merwin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. However, if it anonymously leaked out, I'm sure they wouldn't go after her.
Since they never went after the people who blew her cover.

And no, Scooter doesn't count. They went after him for lying about it, not for doing it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. No, they sent her the info in an unclassified letter...
and it got placed in the congressional record.

But since that wasn't properly declassified, according to the judge, she can't publish it because the rules apply to her.

What a world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-03-07 03:54 PM
Response to Original message
2. Fwiw, Clinton appointee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 11:49 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC