Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Texas wants Oklahoma's water and is going to sue them to get it?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-05-07 05:34 AM
Original message
Texas wants Oklahoma's water and is going to sue them to get it?
:wtf: Water is the new oil. Interesting that one state thinks they can sue another state because they won't give them what they want. I feel sorry for Oklahoma. SCOTUS will surely side with Texas.
http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/dn/latestnews/stories/080507dnmetoklawater.28025a2.html
>>>snip
But the Tarrant water district has gone one step further by suing Oklahoma's water board, alleging that the state's actions, including the moratorium, are invalid and unconstitutional. A hearing is scheduled for September in Oklahoma.

While North Texas has long been interested in Oklahoma's water, observers say the lawsuit marks a more forceful attempt to try to push the issue.

The water war is emotional for many Oklahomans, who fear they could be flushing away their future growth by selling to fast-growing Dallas-Fort Worth. But North Texas officials say both states would benefit from a water sale.
>>>snip
Mr. Ellis, a Democrat from southeastern Oklahoma, offers this solution to North Texas: "You all come over here and you can have the water you want if you pay taxes, employ our people and build plants.

"Or I'll sell it to you at a bottle at a time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-05-07 05:51 AM
Response to Original message
1. Same thing happens here. Florida sues Ga. all the time for water!
I don't know for sure, but it seems here, there is some kind of written agreement and Fl. is unhappy with the volume of water they're getting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-05-07 05:53 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. The difference I think is
That there is an existing agreement with Georgia and Florida.
There isn't one between Texas and Oklahoma.
We are actually suffering in East Texas from the needs of DFW--they want to turn our farmland into lakes.
They are too big and there isn't enough water.
The smart thing would be to quit building...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-05-07 05:54 AM
Response to Original message
3. Mr Ellis has the correct idea.
Then again why would anyone want to invite rich greedy Texans & politicians to move to Oklahoma? Let Texas keep their problems. The rest of the world has enough problems with them in WDC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-05-07 05:57 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. I thought he did too
Oklahoma has the right idea. North Texas is growing very rapidly.
If they run out of water, they won't be able to keep expanding--and chances are, folks would move north to Oklahoma where they have plenty of water. As water becomes the new oil, their resource would be very profitable for expansion in their state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-05-07 08:43 AM
Response to Original message
5. Virginia sued the state of Maryland and WON
The republican federal court in DC gave Virginia the rights to dump sewage into the Potomac River over Maryland's protest. Maryland owned the river since the early 1700's. And the restrict building along the banks of the river. Smart Growth they call it. But Virginia is building house after house after house in any land they can find on the banks. Overloading the sewer system. They wanted to dump the sewage steam or something like that in the the river. Maryland refused, but after the same old judge that approves everything the republicans ruled on it they could.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smaug Donating Member (146 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-05-07 09:46 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Proof positive of the criminal nature of all reTHUGlicans
Being from Arkansas, we've had the water battles with Texas also (about 40 years ago - George Fisher had some of his best political cartoons on the subject). Bluntly, Texas needs to stop the development of their north Texas desert, and consider where else development can proceed. Frankly, I'm opposed to much of the development mentality; we need to build homes, yes, and local schools, yes, but unless there are local or regional resources to support development, development should cease.

Injustice is the reTHUGlican feature. We'd call it a fault, but to reTHUGs it is virtue. Wonder what kind of family values (cough Haggard cough) reside in reTHUG households. This dispute (it would be like me suing someone who wouldn't let me tap freely into their water supply simply because mine isn't adequate enough) and the judge agreeing, saying my being able to water my lawn and wash my car whenever I want is more important than my neighbor's right to the water in their land.

:nopity: for north Texas
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC