Bush to Democratic Congress: Your Complete Capitulation is Not Good Enough

[ProSense]

Monday, August 06, 2007

Bush to Democratic Congress: Your Complete Capitulation is Not Good Enough

JB

From the President's Message on signing the FISA fix:

When Congress returns in September the Intelligence committees and leaders in both parties will need to complete work on the comprehensive reforms requested by Director McConnell, including the important issue of providing meaningful liability protection to those who are alleged to have assisted our Nation following the attacks of September 11, 2001.

Note the key item on this wish list: legal immunity for having participated in the illegal NSA program.

I particularly love the phrase "alleged to have assisted our Nation." In his letter to Congress the other day Intelligence Director Michael McConnell spoke of "liability protection for those who are alleged to have helped the country stay safe after September 11, 2001." Apparently "allegedly helped us stay safe" is Bush Administration code for telecom companies and government officials who participated in a conspiracy to perform illegal surveillance. Because what they did is illegal, we do not admit that they actually did it, we only say that they are alleged to have done it. Or perhaps the Administration is suggesting that although such parties are alleged to have helped the country stay safe, there's no evidence that their repeated violations of federal law actually did much to promote our security. No, they couldn't mean that.

My guess is that President Bush plans to award those who allegedly helped save the country with alleged medals.

"Democrats caved in on a simple provision..."

"How centrists could they possibly be when they are to the right of John Ashcroft?"

[jojo54]

1. Capitulation???

These people that look up these big words for *'s speeches had better be careful - that word just might be the slap in the face that the Dems need to wake up.

[iconoclastic cat]

3. They've been slapped so much, they're now co-dependent. nt

[ProSense]

2. How could Congress pass a law condoning activity that even Bush admits is illegal? n/t

[bryant69]

4. Congressional Democrats had damn well better stand up for themselves at that point

And start fighting back.

I'm not optimistic

Bryant
Check it out --> http://politicalcomment.blogspot.com

[Ino]

5. Oh well. Why not?

No one is going to be held accountable anyway (deep sigh).

[ProSense]

6. Kick! n/t