Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"There is simply no basis for trusting this Administration..." (Kennedy on FISA)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-07-07 03:25 PM
Original message
"There is simply no basis for trusting this Administration..." (Kennedy on FISA)
KENNEDY ON THE FISA MODERNIZATION LEGISLATION
(As Prepared for Delivery)
August 3, 2007

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Mr./Madam President, there is general agreement on both sides of the aisle that we have a foreign intelligence surveillance problem that should be addressed. The difference between us is that on this side of the aisle we have consistently been willing to work cooperatively to solve the problem.

There is a model. In 1976, we faced a similar problem. The Senate Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations with Respect to Intelligence Activities, known as the Church Committee, had found disturbing abuses of electronic surveillance. Congress and the Administration set out to pass a law to prevent such abuses in the future, while still protecting our national security.

In 1976, I was the principal sponsor of the original bill that became FISA. When we first introduced the bill, we had a Democratic Congress, a Republican President, Gerald Ford, and a Republican Attorney General, Ed Levi. Attorney General Levi understood the need for Congress and the Executive Branch to work together. Members of the Judiciary Committee went down to the Justice Department at least four times to meet on the bill. There were discussions with Henry Kissinger, Don Rumsfeld, Brent Scowcroft and George Bush among others.

We worked responsibly and cooperatively to develop legislation to protect our civil liberties and ensure that the nation could use necessary surveillance. In the end, Attorney General Levi praised the bipartisan spirit of cooperation that characterized the negotiations and produced a good bill. That Administration recognized the importance of working with Congress. The final bill was passed by the Senate by a vote of 95 to 1.

As this history demonstrates, our nation is strongest when we work together for our national security. Unfortunately, the current Administration has chosen a very different course. President Bush has refused all along to consult Congress on the development and implementation of its surveillance program, and now we find that it violated the law.

This is not an argument for granting expanded discretion to the Administration. There is simply no basis for trusting this Administration to respect the privacy of the American people. Nor do we have any confidence in the Administration’s competence to adopt a lawful and effective program.

When Attorney General Gonzales appeared before the Judiciary Committee in February 2006, I questioned him about FISA and the recently revealed warrantless eavesdropping program. I offered to work with him then. In fact, I asked him why he had not approached Congress sooner, given Attorney General Levi’s success and given the cost of getting it wrong. He answered, “We did not think we needed to, quite frankly.”

Well, we now know that wasn’t true. I pointed out to the Attorney General at the time the benefit of having consensus on this issue and the importance of fostering a cooperative atmosphere. His answer to me was, “I do not think that we are wrong on this.” But they were wrong, which is why we are debating this issue at the eleventh hour today.

more:

http://kennedy.senate.gov/newsroom/press_release.cfm?id=1350BCEC-4314-4257-AEEF-EEC6489390BB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Brigid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-07-07 03:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. Ya think?
How about those of us who figured that out long ago? :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greatauntoftriplets Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-07-07 03:30 PM
Response to Original message
2. You said a mouthful, Ted.
Good on you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC