In light of these kind of poll results linked below, here at DU...

[Mr_Jefferson_24]

...Do you trust the integrity of national polls that consistently show Hillary as the front runner with a widening lead?

And secondly, do you think MSM is purposefully attempting to marginalize Edwards?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=3430732&mesg_id=3430732

[Nite Owl]

1. They seem to be doing whatever they

can to get at Edwards. You can almost smell their fear of him though, he would not be good for the corporations.

As far as Hillary they are giving her every move air time. She is the most well known name though and she is really working hard and getting around. She is very good at the debates.

[Mr_Jefferson_24]

3. That's the way it seems to me...

...and even so, I don't think she could get the Dem nomination with honest vote collection and counting.

[davidwparker]

2. You know how polls can be worded to elicit a specific outcome. Happens

here all the time.

Poll

Would you prefer to:

A. have Hillary be the 2008 nominee.

B. have a bad case of the flu

C. have your car run out of gas on the interstate -- during rush hour -- in 97 degree heat

[Mr_Jefferson_24]

5. Yes, pollsters can and do word questions to prompt desired results. nt.

[eggman67]

6. Can I take

B and C?

[davidwparker]

7. LOL

[MrSlayer]

4. What are the Iowa polls saying?

The primary isn't national so what does it matter? Momentum is built off the early primaries.

[Mr_Jefferson_24]

8. Kick for larger sample. nt.

[Mr_Jefferson_24]

9. Kick for larger sample. nt.