|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
kpete (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-08-07 09:25 AM Original message |
TODAY: WSJ Recently Required By Murdoch Stands Alone In Praising New FISA Law |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
swag (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-08-07 09:26 AM Response to Original message |
1. I think Paul Gigot's WSJ editorial page would be alone on FISA |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WCGreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-08-07 09:28 AM Response to Reply #1 |
3. You got that right Swag.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Commie Pinko Dirtbag (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-08-07 09:50 AM Response to Reply #1 |
9. What an apropos surname this person has. -nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
swag (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-08-07 10:56 AM Response to Reply #9 |
10. *snort* |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-08-07 09:27 AM Response to Original message |
2. The wsj editorial page has always been right-wing. Murdoch has nothing to do with that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
peaches2003 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-08-07 09:32 AM Response to Original message |
4. Reactionary rag |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ThomWV (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-08-07 09:35 AM Response to Original message |
5. That didn't take long |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MasonJar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-08-07 09:37 AM Response to Original message |
6. I do not read the WSJ, but from editorials posted on DU I would say |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alcibiades_mystery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-08-07 09:46 AM Response to Original message |
7. Like the Murdoh acquisition had anything to do with THAT! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kolesar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-08-07 09:48 AM Response to Original message |
8. Media Matters noted that even the *reporting* by WSJ has a RW bias |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 07:04 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC