Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Discussing what public wants in health care, Luntz left out top priority

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-09-07 12:59 PM
Original message
Discussing what public wants in health care, Luntz left out top priority
http://mediamatters.org/items/200708080008?f=h_top

On the August 7 edition of Fox News' Hannity & Colmes, Sean Hannity answered Alan Colmes' question, "Most people want national health care. Don't they?" with a flat "No." Colmes said he wanted guest Frank Luntz, a Republican pollster, to answer his question. Luntz did not answer whether the public wanted "national health care," instead claiming that people want "control. What they want is the ability to determine their doctor, their hospital, their pharmaceutical plan, and their insurance company." In fact, polling from May and June found that a majority of the public wants a national health insurance program. Moreover, one of those polls, conducted by a Democratic polling firm, found that a majority of likely voters favored universal health insurance even if it limited choices among health care providers.

Several polls taken in May and June found that a majority of respondents favored a government program to provide health insurance to all Americans:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-09-07 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. And so long as the insurance has portability
Frankly, this whole issue of limiting what physicians we can use is ridiculous. What are they going to do, put many physicians out of business? It's so silly. We should be able to go to any doctor or hospital wherever we happen to be. Otherwise, the plan is useless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-09-07 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
2. Edwards plan just adds a medicare plan available to everyone to the mix
Edited on Thu Aug-09-07 01:09 PM by LSK
That just so happens to be the cheapest and probably most efficient of them all. The beauty of it is that Edwards plan is to use the market to undercut the insurance companies when everyone flocks to the cheaper and more efficient medicare plan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ramapo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-09-07 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
3. The only choice I have is how many tens of thousands of $$ to spend
I just want to scream every time I hear this false argument about losing choice with a national plan.

Few of us have much choice today. We can take what is offered by our employer's plan or not. And we are the lucky ones. Few plans allow you freedom of choice. I'm lucky enough to have an out-of-network option. Nice but very expensive. Many specialists don't take any insurance any longer but are nice enough to submit your claim (once you pay up front).

The network providers change constantly. My wife has had a succession of gynos. Some choice.

I certainly don't have a choice of insurers. Yes as employers we do and our options range from bad and expensive to horrible and expensive.

I don't have a choice of where to work. Health insurance becomes an overriding criteria. If not for this, I'd more than likely be doing something else today.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terry in Austin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-09-07 01:17 PM
Response to Original message
4. Frank Luntz
Let's remember he's not simply "a Republican pollster," but the very architect of rightwing Newspeak and its systematic destruction of rational dialogue. He's a key figure in the neocon brain trust, right in there with Grover Norquist and Dick Cheney.

Definitive Luntz quote: "a compelling story, even if factually inaccurate, can be more emotionally compelling than a dry recitation of the truth."
-www.luntzspeak.com

Frank Luntz, the Republican Party's shape-shifting pollster, political consultant, and spin-doctor, is never far from the political spotlight...
-Disinfopedia, the encyclopedia of propaganda
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 03:17 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC