In light if the lastest GOP sex scandal (god knows there is enough of them), here's a piece by a SF sex columnist that really does explain it all:
"Conservative sexual fetishes: A hardcore guide
New to right-wing kinks? Violet Blue explains them all
Violet Blue, Special to SF Gate
Thursday, August 9, 2007
Conservative right-wingers really know how to make the most of their sexual fetishes, but do they have to do it in public?
Indeed they do -- and it's a form of paraphilia just waiting for its own Wikipedia page. It's the way that Michelle Malkin dramatically draws out the word "smut" like a phone sex operator's tool of the trade. It's the deliciously deep sexual fascination that prompted former Sen. (and current Fox News contributard and senior advisor for Washington's Ethics and Public Policy Center) Rick Santorum to state as fact to the Associated Press, "In every society, the definition of marriage has not ever to my knowledge included homosexuality. That's not to pick on homosexuality. It's not, you know, man on child, man on dog, or whatever the case may be."
Pastor Ted Haggard and Jim West know that what's "wrong" feels oh-so-right. So do porn obsessed former Attorney General Ed Meese, porn-fixated current Attorney General Alberto Gonzales. See the obsessively sexual agenda of the American Family Association. These people are way more fixated with sexual transgression than me and my porn star friends put together, and in a wholly apodysophiliac kind of way.
Extreme conservatives have cultivated their anti-sex obsessions into some highly refined, luridly sexualized fetishes. New to conservative fetish sex? Let's explore those fetishes, and what makes them so hot..."
Much, much, more at the
http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/g/a/2007/08/09/violetblue.DTL
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
