Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Redstockings Manifesto (1969)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Madspirit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-11-07 05:37 PM
Original message
Redstockings Manifesto (1969)
http://fsweb.berry.edu/academic/hass/csnider/berry/hum200/redstockings.htm

Redstockings Manifesto (1969)

I. After centuries of individual and preliminary political struggle, women are united to achieve their final liberation from male supremacy. Redstockings is dedicated to building this unity and winning our freedom.

II. Women are an oppressed class. Our oppression is total, affecting every facet of our lives. We are exploited as sex objects, breeders, domestic servants, and cheap labor. We are considered inferior beings, whose only purpose is to enhance men’s lives. Our humanity is denied. Our prescribed behavior is enforced by the threat of physical violence.

Because we have lived so intimately with our oppressors, in isolation form each other, we have been kept from seeing our personal suffering as a political condition. This creates the illusion that a woman’s relationship with her man is a matter interplay between two unique personalities, and can be worked out individually. In reality, every such relationship is a class relationship, and the conflicts between individual men and women are political conflicts that can only be solved collectively.

III. We identify the agents of our oppression as men. Male supremacy is the oldest, most basic form of domination. All other forms of exploitation and oppression (racism, capitalism, imperialism, etc.) are extensions of male supremacy: men dominate women, a few men dominate the rest. All power structures throughout history have been male-dominated and male-oriented. Men have controlled all political, economic and cultural institutions and backed up this control with physical force. They have used their power to keep women in an inferior position. All men receive economic, sexual, and psychological benefits from male supremacy. All men have oppressed women.

IV. Attempts have been made to shift the burden of responsibility from men to institutions or to women themselves. We condemn these arguments as evasions. Institutions alone do not oppress; they are merely tools of the oppressor. To blame institutions implies that men and women are equally victimized, obscures the fact that men benefit from the subordination of women, and gives men the excuse that they are forced to be oppressors. On the contrary, any man is free to renounce his superior position provided that he is willing to be treated like a woman by other men.

We also reject the idea that women consent to or are to blame for their own oppression. Women’s submission is not the result of brainwashing, stupidity, or mental illness but of continual, daily pressure from men. We do not need to change our-selves, but to change men.

The most slanderous evasion of all is that women can oppress men. The basis for this illusion is the isolation of individual relationships from their political context and the tendency of men to see any legitimate challenge to their privileges as persecution.

V. We regard our personal experience, and our feelings about that experience, as the basis for an analysis of our common situation. We cannot rely on existing ideologies as they are all products of male supremacist culture. We question every generalization and accept none that are not confirmed by our experience.

Our chief task at present is to develop female class consciousness through sharing experience and publicly exposing the sexist foundation of all our institutions. Consciousness-raising is not “therapy,” which implies the existence of individual solutions and falsely assumes that the male-female relationship is purely personal, but the only method by which we can ensure that our program for liberation is based on the concrete realities of our lives.

The first requirement for raising class consciousness is honesty, in private and in public, with ourselves and other women.

VI. We identify with all women. We define our best interest as that of the poorest, most brutally exploited woman.

We repudiate all economic, racial, educational or status privileges that divide us from other women. We are determined to recognize and eliminate any prejudices we may hold against other women.

We are committed to achieving internal democracy. We will do whatever is necessary to ensue that every woman in our movement has an equal chance to participate, assume responsibility, and develop her political potential.

VII. We call on all our sisters to unite with us in struggle.

We call on all men to give up their male privileges and support women’s liberation in the interest of our humanity and their own.

In fighting for our liberation we will always take the side of women against their oppressors. We will not ask what is "revolutionary” or “reformist,” only what is good for women.

The time for individual skirmishes has passed. This time we are going all the way.

________________________________________
"I walk. I talk. I shop. I sneeze.
I'm gonna be a fireman when the
floods roll back.
There's trees in the desert since
you moved out,
And I don't sleep on a bed of bones."
*Buffy*
________________________________________

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bobbolink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-11-07 05:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. "We repudiate all economic, racial, educational or status privileges that divide us from other women
If we, as women, would just do this one thing, we would find our strength.

"The time for individual skirmishes has passed. This time we are going all the way."

Wish that it were.....

:cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Madspirit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-11-07 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I SO miss the solidarity!
I loved the 60s and 70s. I have never since felt so united with other women...

Lee
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbolink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-11-07 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. I miss the solidarity, also.
With women, of course, but..... it was a time when people listened to each other more, just in general.

There wasn't this HUGE need to one-up each other, as exists so much now in so-called "peace" groups.

We were there for each other... all the various interest groups. I NEVER heard people say, "I can't support that, I can only support my one interest." We KNEW we needed each other.... all races, all genders, .... ALL.

We would meet after an action, and go around the circle and say what we experienced, and how we felt about it. And, we LISTENED to each other, and would then change and plan accordingly.

Now, it's so much power plays and being cool to belong.

Solidarity.

What a concept.

Long may it wave....

Thanks, Lee!! :hug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbolink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-11-07 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
3. Thank you for the reminder of this!
Just today, I experienced a woman sniping at me, when she could have found support from me.

It's just sad.

Really, really sad.

:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Madspirit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-11-07 06:02 PM
Response to Original message
5. kicking it up...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Madspirit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-11-07 08:01 PM
Response to Original message
6. kicking again...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-11-07 08:25 PM
Response to Original message
7. Love it, thanks!
Edited on Sat Aug-11-07 08:26 PM by OzarkDem
We need to be reminded; solidarity with other women is a very powerful thing.

Come on DU ladies, join in!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbolink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-13-07 05:06 PM
Response to Original message
8. I guess there isn't much relating to our foremothers...
:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
musette_sf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-13-07 05:24 PM
Response to Original message
9. kick
and i do remember the Redstocking Manifesto. thanks for posting it!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hidden Stillness Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-15-07 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
10. A Little Glimpse into a World...
(A note: This was actually going to be posted on the historical thread, 'A trip Through the '60s...The Women's Movement,' with the quotes, and the memories and personal experiences decribed by posters, but I was late and it is already archived. This is the closest topic by the thread-starter, Madspirit.)

"I've always met more discrimination being a woman than being black. When I ran for the Congress, when I ran for President, I met more discrimination as a woman than for being black. Men are men." --The late New York Representative Shirley Chisholm. (Tried also to find a quote I read in a book or magazine many years ago--the '70s I think--from the asshole George Romney, who was once the Governor of Michigan, an extremist and as asshole, about women who were campaigning for the ERA at the time, among whom were the then-current Republican Governor and First Lady, William and Helen Milliken. The quote was that the types of women who supported the Equal Rights Amendment were "extremists and lesbians," trying to destroy the home, etc., the typical, hateful shit. When I tried to search Google, though, all I kept getting were these FAVORABLE, pro-Mormon websites and the quote never did come up! This is the father, of course, of the prick Mitty Romney. The Mormon "Church" has spent countless millions of dollars fighting against the ERA and feminism, even excommunicating feminist Mormons, Sonya Johnson and others.)

Males sometimes delude themselves that there are some women who are not angry, and only "some of them" are--like maybe the "small percentage" of women who have had some kind of "personal experience" of some kind, like who met an abuser, or were raped, or cheated out of a job by a less-qualified male, "once," or etc., and they delude themselves that pseudo-"analyzing" the woman, not males, will yield the solution to the problem. Here are a few memories of a life:

When you live in a society that encourages bigotry against women, then even the most outrageous behavior by males against you, is "explained away" by pretending it was a "joke" or that there "was no malicious intent," taking the judgment completely off the offender and giving it social sanction and acceptance, and putting it only on the victim's angry attempt to fight back. When the whole world excuses whatever males do, and attacks whatever women do, then you know you will always lose--hopeless--and they know they will always win--cruel and emboldened. When I was a kid, I happened to be walking by a male member of my family, who was listening to the radio. As I went by, I heard the lyrics of a song by those pricks, the Rolling Stone, this family member singing, now more loudly, as I went by: "Look at that stupid GI-IRL." "Look at that stupid girl," sung as snide as a male can get it. I felt uncomfortable, looked around, and saw the unmistakable look of male hate, fixed on this family member's face. (These pricks also had a song with the lines, "Under my thumb, a squirming dog who's just had her day.") Another time, sitting at home, I heard a news story of a woman who was raped in her own home, and her guard dog had not attacked the rapist, but later, confused, bit her. I cannot describe what burning rage I felt as I listened, over and over, to the loud laughter and JOKING of males, laughing and laughing, at this incident. (How many thousands of rape "jokes" do women hear from males all around them, over a lifetime?)

I grew up in a household where, if women won some victory--in the house, or anywhere in the world--there was a strained silence from my father, until we were "made to lose" again, and "all the world was set right." This was not even an abusive home; this is what we all live like. I never heard any concern for battered women, discrimination, equal rights, even when personal cases relating to people we knew were discussed. I was as if a pall fell over everything, palpable, and things would not feel "safe" again, until only males were fretted about. Another family member even described a woman friend who had been beaten and was trying to get out, and my father gave an angry look away, cutting off the discussion, and said, "Ah, I don't know anything about that--whether it's true or not," after it had just been described by a witness. This told a common male opinion: the woman is always lying, and I don't give a fuck, you aren't paying attention to ME. I heard lectures on how "feminists really just want to be males," women who want orgasms when males always have them are "sluts/selfish," etc.

When the news got out that O.J. Simpson had murdered Nicole Brown, battered woman whom no one helped, the very first thing my own father said was, "Well, she was probably a bitch." When, about 25 or so years ago, a male in Montreal had murdered only the women in a University there, calling them "all a bunch of fucking feminists," my own father said, "They probably weren't all even feminists," like that was the sad thing, whatever the hell that meant. All women hear taunting laughter about how males make more than we do, (especially after the recent outrageous Supreme Court decision making it impossible to file discrimination charges because of a demand that the victim know all the particulars immediately, when that is impossible--totally ignored by the male media), as all battered woman learned the new line after the "lynch" verdict in the Nicole Brown case, "I'm gonna O.J. you," meaning, I'm going to murder you, and get away with it. Women are taunted, "Let's see your tits bounce," countless, myriad "sexual" taunts, and cannot fight back, or you would escalate it.

Women get taunted about every male privilege, no matter how seemingly small: I remember on a very hot day, a male "friend" took off a T-shirt saying, "I can take my shirt off, and you can't," smiling. I had never thought of it as them shoving our faces in the shit--until then. Phil Donahue has talked about how males get credit for every little thing, and women are attacked unless they do every little thing. As an active parent, Donahue enrolled the kids, then young, in school. When asked their birthdays, Donahue didn't know, but promised to get the information, then said later, that everything that happened, they were so thrilled that a male was doing any parenting at all, that everything was excused and praised, where if a woman had brought the kids in and not even known their birthdates, she would have been considered an unfit mother; this was Phil Donahue. Reminds me of when I was taking care of my beloved, dying Mom. I did everything, kept track of everything, and one time when I was visiting her in the hospital with other male family members, a woman nurse turned to me and said it was so wonderful that my brother was taking care of her and doing all that work. Out of nowhere she had just made this up--so used to crawling like a slave and overpraising them for everything, and ignoring all the real work the women actually do.

No matter how great women athletes are, they are almost never covered by the media, and only if the pricks can exploit them, half-naked; like slaves. No matter how brilliant women are, the comments are not paid any attention to, until a male says it. No matter how bravely they criticize Bush and Republicans--Dixie Chicks, Whoopi Goldberg, Linda Ronstadt, etc.--it is never cheered until some male says it, much later--Olbermann, Stephen Colbert, etc. Then, of course, the praise is all about "big dicks" and "big balls." Imagine praising them for "white, white skin"--why, that would be bigoted! Male bigots have a whole society backing them up on their ugly attitudes, and so they can still maintain the unbelievable fiction that they are "nice guys." "Nice guys," PLUS referring to us as "cunts." Yet we are "ballbusting bitches," no matter how nice, how ethical, we actually are. When a male cheats, "the cold cunt" caused it and "the poor guy" had to do it; when a woman cheats, the "demanding, selfish bitch" caused it, and the "poor guy" should beat the shit out of her. Either way, it goes against the woman. Then of course we have all the phony "academics" on DU as everywhere else, with these phony "histories" of this or that--and never a mention of women or women's perspective.

There was a story of a male rapist that I had read about, who later developed a conscience and started helping with an anti-rape group in prison. Describing the original encounter with (all-male) police, on arrest, and knowing that the victim was not lying and that the attack had happened, this rapist later said, after making up a lying, blame-the-victim routine for police, "I couldn't believe it. They believed everything that I said." They take the pro-male side, first, last and always, approach the woman with only contempt and suspicion, and never analyze themselves at all. Then they deny it--because you are another hated woman.

Sometimes they even invent a whole complicated scenario where they pretend you yourself caused your oppression, because of your "personality type," "your own needs," "your fear of success," on and on. It isn't us sabotaging or threatening us, yet they magically make themselves disappear, as when they say, "She got herself pregnant," another male line. Then of course there is the constant warning to political women: we can't waste time on your little cencerns, we have to fight for the general good, etc., ("everybody"), a phony remark that never excludes them and theirs, but cuts you and your "selfish," "one-issue," etc., interests out, always. Male="general."

Sometimes, I get sick to death of trying for the millionth time to explain to bigoted males what they are doing, and that they fool no one. Still, they deny, "Fuck you too," etc., or give one of the manipulator's replies, "I am so sorry that you hate fully one-half of the world's population, and that perhaps something happened to only you alone, that made you inadequate to deal with males and reality ever again," blah blah blah...No matter how many examples from real life, and male hate, you give them, their response is almost always, drearily, "YOU are so angry..." Not them, never--YOU.

...But then I think again, let them think over every shitty thing they have ever done to women, every time they jumped to the side against the woman when they didn't even know the facts, think of how they so often hate women and think they/males are superior, then try to hide it--and realize that we notice all these things that you do, and ask yourself, "What do you THINK that makes us FEEL like?" How would you feel if you could actually realize that you were blocked by an oppressor group every step of the way, and were never going to achieve what you want and were capable of, and that you will never win, it will never end, you will never get a fair chance? Then imagine after that, that when everything is over and the story is told, it is all a lie, told by the prick who oppressed you and caused the whole thing, and who now completely reworks it to their favor, and you are censored and unheard again, always.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
musette_sf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-15-07 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. what a great post
thank you hidden stillness for this gem. so well written, so well said. this really deserves its own thread. :yourock:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:12 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC