Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

O’Hanlon: Iraq Trip Relied On ‘The Itinerary The Defense Department Developed’

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-12-07 05:21 PM
Original message
O’Hanlon: Iraq Trip Relied On ‘The Itinerary The Defense Department Developed’
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/08/12/ohanlon-greenwald/

O’Hanlon: Iraq Trip Relied On ‘The Itinerary The Defense Department Developed’

In their now infamous New York Times op-ed, Brookings analysts Michael O’Hanlon and Kenneth Pollack wrote that “e are finally getting somewhere” in Iraq, based on their eight day trip to the war-torn country.

In the days following the op-ed, the media gushed over the analyst’s opinions, uncritically referring to them as “vocal war critics,” despite their long history of support for the war.

But in a recent interview, Glenn Greenwald elicits the inner details of the trip from O’Hanlon, confirming “rather conclusively what a fraud this Op-Ed was, and even more so, the deceitfulness of the intense news coverage it generated.” Some key points from the interview:

O’Hanlon admits he is a war supporter: “As you rightly reported,” O’Hanlon told Greenwald, “I was not a critic of this war. In the final analysis, I was a supporter.”

A rushed, cherry-picked trip: O’Hanlon admitted that they spent approximately “between 2-4 hours” in every area they visited outside Baghdad, “and much of that was taken up meeting U.S. military commanders, not inspecting the proverbial ‘conditions on the ground.’” “They spent every night ensconced in the Green Zone in Baghdad,” adds Greenwald.

Pentagon “choreographed” the trip: In the op-ed, the analysts boast, “We just spent eight days meeting with American and Iraqi military and civilian personnel.” But O’Hanlon admitted: “The predominant majority were people who we came into contact with through the itinerary the D.O.D. developed. … For the most part, the conversations were ones arranged by D.O.D”

Unrepresentative view of Iraq: “If someone wanted to argue that we were not getting a representative view of Iraqis because the ones we spoke with were provided by the military, I would agree that this would be a genuine concern,” said O’Hanlon. “By no means did all of the Iraqis agree with the view of progress in Iraq.”

As Sen. Jim Webb (D-VA) told Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) last month, the trips to Iraq organized by the U.S. government are aptly characterized as “the dog and pony show” for the superficial, dressed up view they provide. O’Hanlon and Pollack’s op-ed, however, made no mention of the extent of the Pentagon’s involvement. Nor did O’Hanlon make much mention of it to other media outlets, observes Greenwald.

With the superficiality of their trip revealed, O’Hanlon and Pollack’s op-ed can hardly be considered the “climate-changing” salvo that the right-wing would like it to be.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-12-07 05:26 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yup! The same Dog & Pony show they've been
selling all along.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Vinyl Ripper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-12-07 05:28 PM
Response to Original message
2. A better term..
Potemkin village.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-12-07 05:31 PM
Response to Original message
3. Did you happen to catch "The Politics of the Surge" propaganda show
on Fox? As blatantly dishonest as anything you'd ever hope to see--there was literally either a lie or a dubious statement every 10 seconds. Dramatic patriotic music set to marching-troop scenes and 9/11 footage--sickening and manipulative. And they relied HEAVILY on interviews and journalism from "war critics" like O'Hanlon (who says on camera that leaving Iraq would result in unthinkable disaster, or words similar) to show how "successful" it's all turning out to be. Facts won't change anything. The Propaganda Machine is in full gear, and nothing will stop it--not even the brave Glenn Greenwald.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-12-07 05:40 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. No, I missed it, but I'm forever grateful for people like Greenwald
who shine a light on the lyin' cockroaches.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-12-07 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. "The Propaganda Machine is in full gear."
Indeed! The PR for continued US Occupation of Iraq will be pounding heavily in the next few weeks. Dems will, no doubt, fund it fully...again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-12-07 07:08 PM
Response to Original message
6. What the hell do the sheeple expect
that this admin and the DOD will come out and admit "the surge isn't working"?

Yeah right.

PT Barnum said it best "there's a sucker born every day" - it is sad that they are in congress and in charge of the MSM.

:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ck4829 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-12-07 08:32 PM
Response to Original message
7. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 04:13 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC