Hell, pres. romney couldn't be any worse than bush, could he?

[Philosoraptor]

Think about it and despair. romney IS the bush family's man.

[Heidi]

1. It's "game over" when "couldn't be any worse than Bush" becomes our standard

for electing a president. :cry:

[Philosoraptor]

2. You can't lower the bar after bush moved it to the basement.

[lligrd]

3. Nope. nt

[demobabe]

4. If electing another Republican means we lose the Global Warming battle...

...then yes, Romney could be worse than Bush. Any Republican that gets into office and continues the rape of the Constitution and our Civil Rights is worse than Bush by definition.

[Philosoraptor]

5. Hard to imagine anyone worse, but...

If we can accept bush for 8 whole years, we can accept ANY fucking thing.

[tkmorris]

6. Romney is not electable

I really really really hope they nominate him. He'd lose 46 states.

[Philosoraptor]

7. Neither was bush.

[tkmorris]

11. True

But times have changed. If they nominate a loon, the loon will get clobbered. The weight has shifted to us friend.

[Philosoraptor]

8. romney huckabee 08! 2--2--2 religious fanatics in ONE!

[regnaD kciN]

9. Well, he certainly wouldn't be any great improvement...

...and that's all that needs be said.

[MannyGoldstein]

10. Much Worse

Willard is perfectly amoral, and 20 times smarter than Bush. The damage that Romney could do is enormous = he'd make Bush look like an amateur.

[rox63]

12. Having lived under the Mittens regime in Mass...

I couldn't agree with you more. :(

[zalinda]

13. I don't think he's electable

I think because he is a Mormon, that it will hold him back. Just as Catholics aren't "Christian", neither are Mormons.

zalinda

[cgrindley]

14. He's a Mormon

unacceptable.

[Virginia Dare]

15. He'd be Cheney's puppet, so there's your answer...n/t

[moondust]

16. Perish the thought.

Let's try aiming high this time...

[WI_DEM]

17. He's a pretty boy version of Bush and would be controlled by a Rove-like master